Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-08-2010, 12:11 PM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,111,393 times
Reputation: 8527

Advertisements

For those of you wo get all tingly inside at the prospect of President Obama's falling approval ratings, I offer an interesting history of Presidential approval ratings by the WSJ.

Presidential Approval Ratings from 1945-2008

Last edited by carterstamp; 04-08-2010 at 12:27 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-08-2010, 12:21 PM
 
Location: Washington state
7,211 posts, read 9,431,660 times
Reputation: 1895
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
For those of you wo get all tingly inside at the prospect of Presient Obama's falling approval ratings, I offer an interesting history of Presidential approval ratings by the WSJ.

Presidential Approval Ratings from 1945-2008

Wingnuts aren't interested in any perspective provided by history. Particularly if it goes against what they believe.

Similar to the way they just discard science in favor of religious fairy tales..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 12:23 PM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,330,678 times
Reputation: 7627
Yup, in comparison Obama is doing pretty darned well. Aside from Eisenhower and JFK, they ALL dropped lower than Obama has.

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 12:26 PM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,111,393 times
Reputation: 8527
I happened upon it when I was researching something else. It looks as if they all pretty much tank after the honeymoon period. GWB and Truman almost went into negative numbers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 12:30 PM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,330,678 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
I happened upon it when I was researching something else. It looks as if they all pretty much tank after the honeymoon period. GWB and Truman almost went into negative numbers.
Yup.
Only Clinton ended HIGHER than he started.

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 12:31 PM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,111,393 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Yup.
Only Clinton ended HIGHER than he started.

Ken

I wonder why....so many righties hate his guts....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 12:32 PM
 
Location: Washington state
7,211 posts, read 9,431,660 times
Reputation: 1895
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Yup.
Only Clinton ended HIGHER than he started.

Ken

Yep, and the right claimed he was going to be a one term president too...

You would think they would have learned...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 12:38 PM
 
596 posts, read 889,865 times
Reputation: 1090
Notice all of the high points were the beginning of the terms of the wartime presidents; Truman:WWII, Bush I - Desert Storm and Bush II - 9-11.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 12:40 PM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,330,678 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Upton View Post
Yep, and the right claimed he was going to be a one term president too...

You would think they would have learned...
Well, I can tell you one thing, before Clinton I voted probably 40% GOP and 60% Democratic - but the whole "Get Clinton" witch hunt turned me off the GOP so much that I've voted nearly 100% (not quite) Democratic since that time - and will CONTINUE to vote that way until the whole "witch hunt" mentality is flushed from the GOP (the "witch hunt" mentality I see on this board every single day ("Attack, attack, attack - and pay NO attention to FACTS!"). I swear, the GOP seems to have been taken over by slobbering, wild-eyed lunatics.

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-08-2010, 01:14 PM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,111,393 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by SactoBankerGirl View Post
Notice all of the high points were the beginning of the terms of the wartime presidents; Truman:WWII, Bush I - Desert Storm and Bush II - 9-11.

It's an interesting history lesson, to be sure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:57 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top