Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-12-2010, 02:54 PM
 
42,732 posts, read 29,878,374 times
Reputation: 14345

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
Actually a more logical and simplier reason for lower levels of responses from areas with negative growth is the OBVIOUS one - a lot of the people they are awaiting responses from have simply moved away and are no longer there.

Ken
You're absolutely right. Thank you for the insight.

I was hoping that other people would bring different perspectives to the thread. It is an interesting map to look at.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-12-2010, 02:59 PM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,330,678 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by DC at the Ridge View Post
You're absolutely right. Thank you for the insight.

I was hoping that other people would bring different perspectives to the thread. It is an interesting map to look at.
You are quite welcome.
I agree it's a great map - REALLY interesting.

We had census takers 3 times out near my house and it turns out that one of the houses they were still trying to get info on was the residence of an elderly woman who died a couple of months back - so I know there's a LOT of "clean up" type data collection needing to be done. As with any data collection, getting the first inputs is the easiest and it's the stagglers' info that's hardest to collect (for a variety of reasons).

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 03:33 PM
 
Location: The Woods
18,358 posts, read 26,495,840 times
Reputation: 11351
Quote:
Originally Posted by LordBalfor View Post
You are quite welcome.
I agree it's a great map - REALLY interesting.

We had census takers 3 times out near my house and it turns out that one of the houses they were still trying to get info on was the residence of an elderly woman who died a couple of months back - so I know there's a LOT of "clean up" type data collection needing to be done. As with any data collection, getting the first inputs is the easiest and it's the stagglers' info that's hardest to collect (for a variety of reasons).

Ken
Boy does that remind me of something funny. 20 years ago when I was growing up, I had a "fort" of sorts (I was really into building things, and myself and my father put up a "fort" that truly looked like a small cabin with a tower on one corner). It even had a gate, a fake address number (for a non-existant street that was actually just a path to the woods out back) and an old mailbox by the door. It was right at the end of our driveway in the yard behind our house. The census worker after going to our house went to my fort and knocked, then left a paper when no one answered. All of us watched this out the living room window and we laughing so hard. I still laugh remembering that...I wonder if that was marked as not participating in the census...ROFL
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 03:39 PM
 
7,006 posts, read 6,994,198 times
Reputation: 7060
Quote:
If 100% of households mailed back their forms, taxpayers would save $1.5 BILLION dollars.
Exactly how?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 03:49 PM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,330,678 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by renault View Post
Exactly how?
I would suspect that would be by avoiding hiring the thousands and thousands of individual census takers who have to go out to these milllions of homes and collect the data one at a time. All that labor is very very costly - not just the time to do the actually data collection, but also the time to hire and train those folks (and there's a LOT of them that get hired to collect all that straggler data). The number of such temporary workers is estimated to be up to 700,000.

Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 03:50 PM
 
Location: So Cal
10,031 posts, read 9,507,142 times
Reputation: 10453
Quote:
Originally Posted by renault View Post
Exactly how?
The cost of census workers having to call and or physically going to the residence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 04:15 PM
 
Location: Alameda, CA
7,605 posts, read 4,845,391 times
Reputation: 1438
When I checked the map for my local community, it looked like there was a strong correlation between participation and the wealthier sections of town.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 04:19 PM
 
Location: Marion, IA
2,793 posts, read 6,123,478 times
Reputation: 1613
No surprise the capital of Ignorance, Iowa, is at the top.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-12-2010, 04:58 PM
 
Location: In a house
5,232 posts, read 8,415,423 times
Reputation: 2583
Personally I find the whole thing absurd & expensive. Just another way to waste our money paying for unneeded Govt employees.
They know exactly who lives where & how many kids etc. They have this info to tax us with & those on welfare not paying their own way or contributing to our economy are also documented. The only possible thing they can gain is numbers of illegals & they shouldn't matter.

They say its needed to give us our fair share in Federal aid. Well if they didn't take it in the first place they wouldn't need to worry about it. Why tax us & then make us do tricks & beg for it back? Because they want to pull the strings thats why. The simple fact is the feds should only recieve enough funding to run the gov't, not to redistribute wealth. A more un-American thing does not exist.

This trend of ours is simply sickening.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:38 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top