Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-13-2010, 07:18 PM
 
180 posts, read 188,535 times
Reputation: 111

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by arctichomesteader View Post
The Union still had slaves until after the end of the war (border states). Furthermore, the Union violated rights as well...starving POW's, arresting critics of Lincoln, raping, looting, pillaging, burning, etc.
I'm not arguing that the Union was perfect.

I'm arguing that our country today..with a federal government that stands for and protects human rights is much better than one that would allow its citizens to strip those rights from others.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-13-2010, 07:18 PM
 
Location: The Woods
18,358 posts, read 26,495,840 times
Reputation: 11351
Quote:
Originally Posted by GALiberal View Post
So what you're saying is that in desperation when it was clear that they were going to lose the war..they promised to free slaves for British support.

What I'm saying is that when it REALLY MATTERED in 1861 when they were forming their government, they decided to codify slave ownership as a constitutionally protected right.
It had been tossed around earlier.

Of course the U.S. Constitution also protected slavery as a legal right so there was no real difference between the Union and South in 1861 on slavery.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2010, 07:20 PM
 
Location: The Woods
18,358 posts, read 26,495,840 times
Reputation: 11351
Quote:
Originally Posted by GALiberal View Post
I'm not arguing that the Union was perfect.

I'm arguing that our country today..with a federal government that stands for and protects human rights is much better than one that would allow its citizens to strip those rights from others.
Our government today that massacres innocent people, engages in wars all over playing world's policeman, intrudes on every facet of our lives, etc.?

Never mind the fact too it took about a century for Blacks to even be treated as equals in the U.S.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2010, 07:20 PM
 
180 posts, read 188,535 times
Reputation: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Desert kid View Post
Think with an 1861 mindset, leave your 2010 morals at the door, would that type of thinking even be considered abnormal at the time of the war?

I'm not justifying slavery in any way, but you have to judge these things on the context of the times.
Morality is a notion that is universal..what is wrong today..was wrong in 1861. Any government whether federal, state or local that would allow ownership of other human being is inferior to one which will not.

Its really that simple.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2010, 07:21 PM
 
180 posts, read 188,535 times
Reputation: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by arctichomesteader View Post
Our government today that massacres innocent people, engages in wars all over playing world's policeman, intrudes on every facet of our lives, etc.?
Not saying our country today is perfect. I'm saying its better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2010, 07:23 PM
 
Location: The Woods
18,358 posts, read 26,495,840 times
Reputation: 11351
Quote:
Originally Posted by GALiberal View Post
Not saying our country today is perfect. I'm saying its better.
If measured by lives taken and destroyed, I'd say it's worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2010, 07:27 PM
 
Location: Pasadena
7,411 posts, read 10,389,847 times
Reputation: 1802
CNN is just one of many American media outlets pointing out how neo-confederates are anti-American criminals who need to be kept under careful surveillance by the FBI or encouraged to immigrate to Iran where they would feel right at home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2010, 07:35 PM
 
Location: Southeast Arizona
3,378 posts, read 5,009,620 times
Reputation: 2463
Quote:
Originally Posted by GALiberal View Post
Morality is a notion that is universal..what is wrong today..was wrong in 1861. Any government whether federal, state or local that would allow ownership of other human being is inferior to one which will not.

Its really that simple.
Morality changes all the time, the last 140 years is perfect evidence of that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by californio sur View Post
CNN is just one of many American media outlets pointing out how neo-confederates are anti-American criminals who need to be kept under careful surveillance by the FBI or encouraged to immigrate to Iran where they would feel right at home.
From what I saw, CNN is a channel that has gone to Obama drone cranks, only with a few vestiges of centerism left. And your assertion, that we should all be kept under watch of the FBI? Leave them alone and let them track guns going to Mexico, and Iran, I wouldn't go there, it's hot enough in Arizona already and it's not like I'm going to commit anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2010, 07:44 PM
 
180 posts, read 188,535 times
Reputation: 111
Quote:
Originally Posted by Desert kid View Post
Morality changes all the time, the last 140 years is perfect evidence of that.
No, society changes. What society accepts as moral (or immoral) or what atrocities a society may attempt to rationalize changes.

But there was never a time when the institution of slavery was okay or morally acceptable. Only a time when American society was less moral.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2010, 07:48 PM
 
Location: Southeast Arizona
3,378 posts, read 5,009,620 times
Reputation: 2463
Quote:
Originally Posted by GALiberal View Post
No, society changes. What society accepts as moral (or immoral) or what atrocities a society may attempt to rationalize changes.

But there was never a time when the institution of slavery was okay or morally acceptable. Only a time when American society was less moral.
Slavery back then was considered moral, and NORMAL. But you cannot judge it, now, tommorrow or 20,000 years from now with the logic of now, you have to judge it in the context of the times, the year 1861.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:22 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top