Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-13-2010, 06:22 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,108,168 times
Reputation: 8527

Advertisements

Hey, Sarah, ya might wanna read up on this guy. You becha..

What Sarah Palin forgets (or never knew) about Ronald Reagan - Ronald Reagan - Salon.com

What Sarah Palin forgets (or never knew) about Ronald Reagan

She warbles a macho fantasy about our 40th president. But the real Reagan wanted a world free of nuclear arms

Listening to Sarah Palin, it is often difficult to determine whether her remarks demonstrate ignorance or dishonesty. She frequently waxes on about Ronald Reagan, for instance, revered ancestor of today's far right, whose real record bears little resemblance to the fantasies of extremists like her.

While attacking President Obama's nuclear weapons policies the other day -- and the strategic arms reduction treaty that he signed with Russia -- Palin said, "We miss Ronald Reagan, who used to say, when he would look at our enemies, he would say: 'No. You lose. We win.' That's what we miss. And that is what we have to get back to."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-13-2010, 06:25 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,344,311 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
Hey, Sarah, ya might wanna read up on this guy. You becha..

What Sarah Palin forgets (or never knew) about Ronald Reagan - Ronald Reagan - Salon.com

What Sarah Palin forgets (or never knew) about Ronald Reagan

She warbles a macho fantasy about our 40th president. But the real Reagan wanted a world free of nuclear arms

Listening to Sarah Palin, it is often difficult to determine whether her remarks demonstrate ignorance or dishonesty. She frequently waxes on about Ronald Reagan, for instance, revered ancestor of today's far right, whose real record bears little resemblance to the fantasies of extremists like her.

While attacking President Obama's nuclear weapons policies the other day -- and the strategic arms reduction treaty that he signed with Russia -- Palin said, "We miss Ronald Reagan, who used to say, when he would look at our enemies, he would say: 'No. You lose. We win.' That's what we miss. And that is what we have to get back to."


If you find her so objectionable why do you listen to her?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2010, 06:29 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,108,168 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
If you find her so objectionable why do you listen to her?

Did you at least read the piece?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2010, 06:29 AM
 
1,653 posts, read 1,170,292 times
Reputation: 442
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
If you find her so objectionable why do you listen to her?
It's that train wreck thingy
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2010, 06:30 AM
 
Location: Massatucky
1,187 posts, read 2,393,886 times
Reputation: 1916
One who ignores their enemies do so at their peril. I listen to the The Big Fat idiot to gather my arguments against know-nothings like Palin and Limbaugh so I can set the rednecks straight when the opportunity arises. Since its all talking points and only right wingers need to be reminded regularly what to think, its not much of a challenge. In any event, friends close, enemies closer and all that. Dig it. The RIGHT is in decline. They just have more gasbags per/1000.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2010, 06:33 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,108,168 times
Reputation: 8527
Point is, if Sarah is going to bring up Ronald Reagan, at least get the facts straight. But, then, she only has a passing acquaintance with those, and changes them regularly when paid enough.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2010, 06:37 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,344,311 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwaggy View Post
One who ignores their enemies do so at their peril. I listen to the The Big Fat idiot to gather my arguments against know-nothings like Palin and Limbaugh so I can set the rednecks straight when the opportunity arises. Since its all talking points and only right wingers need to be reminded regularly what to think, its not much of a challenge. In any event, friends close, enemies closer and all that. Dig it. The RIGHT is in decline. They just have more gasbags per/1000.

That's interesting. Which political office does Limbaugh hold? How about Palin? Who told you that the right is in decline? Was it Rachel Maddow?


Democratic Party Image Drops to Record Low
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2010, 06:45 AM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,108,168 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Roma View Post
That's interesting. Which political office does Limbaugh hold? How about Palin? Who told you that the right is in decline? Was it Rachel Maddow?


Democratic Party Image Drops to Record Low

Did you read the piece?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2010, 06:47 AM
 
Location: Massatucky
1,187 posts, read 2,393,886 times
Reputation: 1916
They are the current Opinion Leaders of the Republican Party. That is evidence of enough for me of decline. Sure Maddow is the antidote to King and Queen Redneck but at least I'm laughing. She's my neighbor here in Happy Valley in Western Massatucky, heart and homeland of vegetarian birkenstocked liberal lawyers and solar architects by the hundreds living in co-housing collectives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-13-2010, 06:58 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
10,029 posts, read 8,344,311 times
Reputation: 4212
Quote:
Originally Posted by carterstamp View Post
Did you read the piece?

Well, you know what they say about a person who answers a question with a question. I did read it before I posted in this thread.

Here's a question for you:

In what way would you say that today's world differs from the world during the Reagan era?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:14 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top