Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-24-2010, 03:35 PM
 
30,065 posts, read 18,665,937 times
Reputation: 20882

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
If he wasn't a conservative, why did he nominate very conservative judges to SCOTUS - Roberts and Alito?

That is the only decent thing that Bush did. Can you imagine the Supreme Court if two liberal whack jobs were named in thier place?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-24-2010, 03:44 PM
 
Location: Neither here nor there
14,810 posts, read 16,207,740 times
Reputation: 33001
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
How come Bush wasn't called a Socialist, Commie when he signed Medicare Part "D"?

Oh, and where were the Tea Parties back then?
I dunno. You tell me. You guys just weren't on the ball.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2010, 03:49 PM
 
Location: Aloha, Oregon
1,089 posts, read 655,321 times
Reputation: 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by nononsenseguy View Post
Always the "illegal war" mantra. Why was it "illegal"? What makes a war illegal or legal? The attack on the WTC towers was "illegal" I suppose, but that didn't stop them. The war on terror may have been "illegal" in your eyes, but it was justified. In my eyes, that makes it legal, and we determined to go where we had to to flush out and destroy terrorists, including an evil dictator who surely would have joined with the rest of the terrorists to fight the US..
Iraq and that evil didctator didn't have anything to did 911. The fact is Saddam was contained and in fact Colin Powell and Condi Rice said so in Feb after Bush took office.

Quote:
Then of, course there is always the "he cut taxes for the rich" mantra. But the "rich" also run businesses and create jobs. They drive the economy and cause it to expand. This is why when their taxes ar cut, tax revenue actually goes up, not down (as it has with Obamas tax increases).Works every time.
Taxes don't pay for themselves and never will. I know there is the common misconception that JFK's (LBj) tax caused more revenue to be taken in. Actually while lowering rates, the legislation closed some large tax loopholes and that's why revenue went up.

Quote:
That's why for most of the Bush years, the economy was humming, until the housing/banking problem, which was not caused by Bush, or conservative policies; on the contrary, it was caused by liberal housing and banking policies. The liberal "chickens" came home to roost (to borrow a phrase from Rev. Wright).
Anybody can have a humming economy with an unlimited credit card.

Quote:
Finally, social security has always been doomed to fail. It has been proven time and time again that a person investing the same money in a private fund would be far better off than with social security. Privatizing it would be smart, if we could ever get it done. It really needs to happen
See my post above.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2010, 03:56 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,971 posts, read 22,151,621 times
Reputation: 13801
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
Oh, and where were the Tea Parties back then?
Bush started the conservative revolt and inspired the TEA parties, with his big government, and big spending. 0bama just pushed the movement into high gear by announcing nothing but big government, big taxes, and unprecedented spending policies, that even Bush did not see coming.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2010, 03:56 PM
 
Location: Aloha, Oregon
1,089 posts, read 655,321 times
Reputation: 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by hawkeye2009 View Post
That is the only decent thing that Bush did. Can you imagine the Supreme Court if two liberal whack jobs were named in thier place?
Absolutely, the Citizen's United decision would have gone the other way. Roberts and Alito lied when they said they wouldn't break precedent. They overturn established law. People are People and corporation/unions are not people. They are conservative activist whack jobs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2010, 04:00 PM
 
Location: Aloha, Oregon
1,089 posts, read 655,321 times
Reputation: 208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wapasha View Post
Bush started the conservative revolt and inspired the TEA parties, with his big government, and big spending. 0bama just pushed the movement into high gear by announcing nothing but big government, big taxes, and unprecedented spending policies, that even Bush did not see coming.
Republicans are always big govenment despite the rhetoric they spew.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2010, 04:21 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,971 posts, read 22,151,621 times
Reputation: 13801
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
Iraq and that evil didctator didn't have anything to did 911. The fact is Saddam was contained and in fact Colin Powell and Condi Rice said so in Feb after Bush took office.
Bush never claimed the Saddam had a part in the Sept 11 attack.

Also, in 2004 Putin reveled that he told the Bush Administration that the Russian KGB had intelligence indicating that Saddam was planning terrorist attacks on U.S. targets, both abroad and on American soil post September 11, 2001. This information was not released prior to our invasion into Iraq, and i can only assume it was classified at the.

BBC NEWS | Americas | Putin says Iraq planned US attack
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2010, 04:33 PM
 
Location: Wisconsin
37,971 posts, read 22,151,621 times
Reputation: 13801
Quote:
Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
Republicans are always big govenment despite the rhetoric they spew.
For far too many politicians, they feel they need to justify their presence in Washington by enacting new laws, new government programs and spending ever more taxpayer money.

Just once I'd like to see them "committed to going through our budget line by line to root out waste and inefficiency". but instead they pat each other on the back for writing new creative ways to tax us.

When will enough taxes truly be enough for these @#%!#?? When we are all paying 50% - 60% of our hard earned money as taxes, will they be satisfied then? Or will a batch of newly elected congressmen and senators decide they too need to justify their presence in Washington?

Quote is 0bama's
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:34 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top