Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-27-2010, 04:13 PM
 
11,944 posts, read 14,781,454 times
Reputation: 2772

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fleet View Post
Could be. I don't know what that has to do with the Tea Party, though.
AWWW shucks by golly gee willikers fleet, you mean you don't know??
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_ene...y_is_my_friend

Last edited by harborlady; 04-27-2010 at 04:14 PM.. Reason: broken link
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-27-2010, 04:33 PM
 
Location: San Diego North County
4,803 posts, read 8,749,253 times
Reputation: 3022
Quote:
Originally Posted by Upton View Post
You can tell a lot about a movement by it's supporters.

For some reason, the white supremacists just love the Teabaggers...I wonder why?
Ummmm....maybe for the same reason Democrats once supported segregation?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2010, 04:39 PM
 
Location: San Diego North County
4,803 posts, read 8,749,253 times
Reputation: 3022
Quote:
Originally Posted by denverian View Post
I don't think all Tea Baggers are racist, but I'd bet most racists in this country are Tea Baggers
So, by inductive argument, we can deduce the following (if I'm understanding your post correctly).

Most racists are Tea Baggers
Tea Baggers are mostly white.
Only white people are racists.

Wait...isn't that racist in and of itself?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2010, 04:41 PM
 
Location: South Fla
9,644 posts, read 9,845,032 times
Reputation: 1942
If you value what David Duke has to say then there is no hope
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2010, 04:53 PM
 
Location: MI
1,933 posts, read 1,825,186 times
Reputation: 509
Now is he residing in the USA or Salzsburg Austria? Who care what comes out of his hate-filled jacked-up mind!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2010, 05:02 PM
 
2,125 posts, read 1,939,708 times
Reputation: 1010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kele View Post
So, by inductive argument, we can deduce the following (if I'm understanding your post correctly).

Most racists are Tea Baggers
Tea Baggers are mostly white.
Only white people are racists.

Wait...isn't that racist in and of itself?
This is a dumb argument from the jump, but you'd fail a logic class with reasoning like that. You went from "mostly" on your second proposition to "only" on your third proposition.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2010, 05:02 PM
 
Location: Washington state
7,211 posts, read 9,430,967 times
Reputation: 1895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kele View Post
Ummmm....maybe for the same reason Democrats once supported segregation?
Old time southern Democrats were racists. So, I guess you're trying to say the Teabaggers are too.

okay, I accept that...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2010, 05:06 PM
 
Location: San Diego North County
4,803 posts, read 8,749,253 times
Reputation: 3022
Quote:
Originally Posted by Upton View Post
Old time southern Democrats were racists. So, I guess you're trying to say the Teabaggers are too.

okay, I accept that...
Nope--just trying to show you the fallacy of your appeal to belief argument, but then I realized that if you knew what it was, you likely wouldn't use it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2010, 05:10 PM
 
Location: Neither here nor there
14,810 posts, read 16,206,409 times
Reputation: 33001
Quote:
Originally Posted by PacNW transplant View Post
How is it there was no Tea Party grass roots movement when Bush was in office .
Why was there no liberal equivalent of the Tea Party when Bush was in office?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-27-2010, 05:10 PM
 
Location: San Diego North County
4,803 posts, read 8,749,253 times
Reputation: 3022
Quote:
Originally Posted by dunks_galore View Post
This is a dumb argument from the jump, but you'd fail a logic class with reasoning like that. You went from "mostly" on your second proposition to "only" on your third proposition.
It works for inductive reasoning. Perhaps you were thinking of a syllogism? Either way, it is a fallacy and that is exactly what I was trying to point out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:57 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top