Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sorry but yeah I do think there is a difference. It is all about how you carry yourself. It is how you act that defines you.
I don't disagree, but I don't like the hypocrisy that somehow walking around and being photographed in lingerie wouldn't qualify as such (And is a family friendly act of carrying self), but fully clothed pole dancing is an abomination.
Now she will be beheaded for sure by some Muslim for not covering her body and for disobeying Allah. If she got prize money, it will all go to security because I go to school in Dearborn, Michigan and I can tell some of the Muslims here do NOT like this. She is a disgrace to Islam.
Stay tuned, guys. Stay tuned...
HOW IS THIS GIRL EVEN STILL ALIVE??? She can't be living in Dearborn right now.
How about walking around in a lingerie in public? Would you condone that?
Islam DOES NOT CONDONE THAT!
Quote:
CNN) -- Women who dress provocatively and tempt people into promiscuity are to blame for earthquakes, a leading Iranian hard-line cleric has apparently said.
The prayer leader, Hojatoleslam Kazim Sadeghi, says women and girls who "don't dress appropriately" spread "promiscuity in society."
"When promiscuity spreads, earthquakes increase," he says in a video posted Monday on YouTube, apparently of him leading Friday prayers in Tehran, Iran, last week. http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/04/20/iran.promiscuity.earthquakes
But this ain't about Islam versus Christianity. This is about having an issue with fully clothed individual, pole dancing, as somehow being a dis-qualifier in an event that includes walking around in lingerie and being photographed. Somehow latter is fine, the former is blasphemy.
But this ain't about Islam versus Christianity. This is about having an issue with fully clothed individual, pole dancing, as somehow being a dis-qualifier in an event that includes walking around in lingerie and being photographed. Somehow latter is fine, the former is blasphemy.
THE POINT IS THAT EVEN IF CHRISTIANS DON'T, THEY ARE NOT GONNA KILL THE GIRL OVER IT. Big difference, pal!
I didn't mention Christianity , by the way. YOU DID!
THE POINT IS THAT EVEN IF CHRISTIANS DON'T, THEY ARE NOT GONNA KILL THE GIRL OVER IT. Big difference, pal!
I didn't mention Christianity , by the way. YOU DID!
People kill people, religions don't. Or, did Christianity kill witches? Did Christianity kill Jews? If someone mentions religion, and Islam, we're bound to look for a greater perspective. So quit whining. The least you could do is talk something about the subject at hand, at least the pieces I have in my posts if you choose to respond to them.
I don't disagree, but I don't like the hypocrisy that somehow walking around and being photographed in lingerie wouldn't qualify as such (And is a family friendly act of carrying self), but fully clothed pole dancing is an abomination.
No abomination just the wrong choice. As for the lingerie I stated it depends on how reveling it is.
People kill people, religions don't. Or, did Christianity kill witches? Did Christianity kill Jews? If someone mentions religion, and Islam, we're bound to look for a greater perspective. So quit whining. The least you could do is talk something about the subject at hand, at least the pieces I have in my posts if you choose to respond to them.
she's hot. who cares?
bet she won't get dropped unless she has a hardcore porn vid out
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.