Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
OK my friend pelase explain the article to our chanllenged friend. Mmm I think you and I read it the same way. It's ok you already wrote how you saw it. You can tell her.
The Steyn article was a screed of manufactred outrage over a nonevent. Mark Levin would be proud to author such a scholarly piece.
Yes I am sure you didn't. You couldn't understand the original article I am sure you would find it hard to follow the posts too. Make sure to have plenty of bacon and sausage!
The Steyn article was a screed of manufactred outrage over a nonevent. Mark Levin would be proud to author such a scholarly piece.
Hey I issued a challenge to another poster who ran away. Perhaps you could do better. Debunk the article if it is so biased. We await your response with great anticipation!
You aren't aware that it's a matter of opinion, not reality...
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby
Hey I issued a challenge to another poster who ran away. Perhaps you could do better. Debunk the article if it is so biased. We await your response with great anticipation!
OK...
Steyn says Obama sucks.
I say Steyn's opinion piece sucks. All of his opinion pieces that I've ever read suck. And he sucks when he sits in for Limbaugh. If he has any kids, they probably suck, too.
I say Steyn's opinion piece sucks. All of his opinion pieces that I've ever read suck. And he sucks when he sits in for Limbaugh. If he has any kids, they probably suck, too.
I scoff at your "challenge."
Ah the educational system working it's magic again! I guess this is what passes for argument on the left. Now wonder a thumpin' is coming in November.
As expected, there are still some the will protect and stand up for Obama, no matter what.
8 years ago or not, it doesnt matter how long ago it happened. And I dont care if he was reading a stupid teleprompter. The man couldnt have the decency to try and speak from the heart or honestly. Instead, he settles for that pathetic statement. Obama will put more heart and soul when he confronts groups like SEIU, or ACORN, or when he's on the campaign trail. Watch the videos, he clearly has more passion when he speaks to SEIU then when he talks about the Foot Hood terrorism, or Daniel Pearl.
But hey, why should I be shocked that this just doesnt phase some of you? After all, youre probably the same ones who stood behind Obama during his last press conference, in which he said a police dept acted stupidly, right after admitting he didnt know the facts. And I bet you same people also gave a standing ovation to the Mexican President after he dared come over here and trash our laws, state, country. And Obama and his people havent read the bill, yet come out and have no problem trashing it.
There's no real argument offered by either you or Steyn.
Only simple opinion unsupported by anything other than your bias.
The fact you can't differentiate speaks for itself.
Let me help you out here.
Obama's words.
"Obviously, the loss of Daniel Pearl was one of those moments that captured the world's imagination because it reminded us of how valuable a free press is."
Only the left would view Daniel Pearl's murder this way. The entire article is about it. I am sure you don't want to address it because it is indefensible.
"Obviously, the loss of Daniel Pearl was one of those moments that captured the world's imagination because it reminded us of how valuable a free press is."
Only the left would view Daniel Pearl's murder this way. The entire article is about it. I am sure you don't want to address it because it is indefensible.
Its a bit like the Arizona bill or the Health Care bill or Porkulus, etc. Many leftists tend to not read things yet come out in full force against/for them, which ever serves their agenda/interests. These people criticizing the article didnt read it and have no intention to. Whether Mark Stein, or Limbaugh wrote it, its a very good piece and makes a heck of a lot more sense if you actually read the thing, or if you arent a liberal drone.
"Obviously, the loss of Daniel Pearl was one of those moments that captured the world's imagination because it reminded us of how valuable a free press is."
Only the left would view Daniel Pearl's murder this way. The entire article is about it. I am sure you don't want to address it because it is indefensible.
You're pole vaulting over tick turds.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You aren't aware that it's a matter of opinion, not reality...
