Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
You just keep proving how damn gullible you are. What other reason would there be for hiring and firing the same person multiple times? Man I wish you were my boss, I would be able to get away with murder working under you.
Have you ever worked for the government? Have you ever worked for the Census? Do you have any idea how they hire and organize their schedules -- or why?!
And do you honestly think those numbers arent scrutinized? Or that there isnt a special slot in every reporting form to differentiate between "new hire" and "returning employee"? In a government project?!
Even the best the original article could come up with was "it seems" and "I heard." The letters in part 2 say nothing about it. But this News Corp. employee is going with these straws in order to keep you sheep upset (his job). Seems pretty flimsy to me, but it doesnt take much with you guys, right?
I'd like to know if the Census recruited more workers, percentagewise, this year than in previous years. I'll look around.
In the end I dont care if they hired them and fired them and rehired them. I dont think its so they can make their job numbers and unemployment low.
I do wonder why in the hell this would be the practice of any organization!!
End again would I expect anything less of a government run program.
Sure your information is safe....TRUST US....
This why I answer question 1 and return it!
In the end I dont care if they hired them and fired them and rehired them. I dont think its so they can make their job numbers and unemployment low.
I do wonder why in the hell this would be the practice of any organization!!
End again would I expect anything less of a government run program.
Sure your information is safe....TRUST US....
This why I answer question 1 and return it!
Yes. The only reason that we did census this year was to make Obama look better with additional hiring.
I never got a census form in my household, and no one came to my door yet so I guess there are some people who go under the radar. I'm sure I'm not the only one out of the millions
Have you ever worked for the government? Have you ever worked for the Census? Do you have any idea how they hire and organize their schedules -- or why?!
And do you honestly think those numbers arent scrutinized? Or that there isnt a special slot in every reporting form to differentiate between "new hire" and "returning employee"? In a government project?!
Even the best the original article could come up with was "it seems" and "I heard." The letters in part 2 say nothing about it. But this News Corp. employee is going with these straws in order to keep you sheep upset (his job). Seems pretty flimsy to me, but it doesnt take much with you guys, right?
I'd like to know if the Census recruited more workers, percentagewise, this year than in previous years. I'll look around.
If you are saying that it is normal for government to engage in practices like that, then I must ask you another question. Are you happy with this? Do you approve of them running things like 5 year olds? If you don't, why don't you say so instead of providing cover for them? If you're not speaking out against their behavior like this especially after they just took over HC, you must be a shill for the WH. Nothing else would explain why you condone such behavior. All in all, they did it for the extra employment numbers. They have been fudging those numbers since day 1 and continue to do so.
If you are saying that it is normal for government to engage in practices like that, then I must ask you another question. Are you happy with this? Do you approve of them running things like 5 year olds? If you don't, why don't you say so instead of providing cover for them? If you're not speaking out against their behavior like this especially after they just took over HC, you must be a shill for the WH. Nothing else would explain why you condone such behavior. All in all, they did it for the extra employment numbers. They have been fudging those numbers since day 1 and continue to do so.
That's your opinion. What's the point in arguing opinions?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
