Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-06-2010, 11:56 PM
 
Location: OCEAN BREEZES AND VIEWS SAN CLEMENTE
19,893 posts, read 18,435,269 times
Reputation: 6465

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
The banks don't care about market prices, buyers or sellers.
The banks care about their balance sheets and how this effects their bottom line.

If they hold onto the properties they can value them at whatever they want.
The Fed changed the rules to allow that...it's called "mark to magic".
They don't have to mark to market unless the home is actually on the market. If the home sells for a loss, they have to list the loss.

By holding the homes in their inventory they are actually buffering up their balance sheets with these high value assets.
And you are very correct. I have many realtor friends, and i was a real estate assistant for many years. Bottom line is the bank cares about how things look on paper. They do hold on to the properties as long as they can, and they they can value them at a price they deem fit. They really do not want to list the homes that sell at a loss. The reason they hold on to the homes in inventory, is to buffer up their balance sheet, and the high value assents looks good on paper, better then a loss.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-07-2010, 07:33 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,668,317 times
Reputation: 22474
So when do Obama and Pelosi convince Congress to pass another multi-trillion dollar stimulus?

Since this stimulus didn't work, they'll have to get another even bigger one because that was their only plan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2010, 07:37 AM
 
Location: OCEAN BREEZES AND VIEWS SAN CLEMENTE
19,893 posts, read 18,435,269 times
Reputation: 6465
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
So when do Obama and Pelosi convince Congress to pass another multi-trillion dollar stimulus?

Since this stimulus didn't work, they'll have to get another even bigger one because that was their only plan.
And we all know how well the Stimulus Plan WORKED .........RIGHT! if this is their plan, i guess they don't have a plan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2010, 07:43 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,668,317 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by california-jewel View Post
And we all know how well the Stimulus Plan WORKED .........RIGHT! if this is their plan, i guess they don't have a plan.
That was their plan. Government spending was going to kick-start the economy - or so they said. It was really just a way to rob the middle class to make sure the filthy rich would see no pain. Those who robbed this country blind didn't want to suffer. They are who benefitted from the stimulus and we're stuck holding the bill for it - with no way to pay it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2010, 09:10 AM
 
Location: OCEAN BREEZES AND VIEWS SAN CLEMENTE
19,893 posts, read 18,435,269 times
Reputation: 6465
Quote:
Originally Posted by malamute View Post
That was their plan. Government spending was going to kick-start the economy - or so they said. It was really just a way to rob the middle class to make sure the filthy rich would see no pain. Those who robbed this country blind didn't want to suffer. They are who benefitted from the stimulus and we're stuck holding the bill for it - with no way to pay it.
I am thrilled that some besides myself do undesrstand this. And ain't that the truth, and who in turn is stuck holding the bag..........Well we know only to well don't we now!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-07-2010, 09:12 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,952 posts, read 17,848,920 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by shorebaby View Post
But I'll take a stab at it. If all the banks were to flood the market with their forclosed homes the prices would be depressed due to increased inventories, that isn't in anybody's interest. Not the banks and not other sellers.
How about buyers? Wouldn't lower prices help buyers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:59 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top