Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Would u favour a VAT of only 0.2% capped,to cover natural disasters
YES 6 10.91%
NO 49 89.09%
Voters: 55. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 06-08-2010, 07:22 PM
 
Location: San Francisco, CA
15,088 posts, read 13,450,610 times
Reputation: 14266

Advertisements

No. The major problems with government responses to a natural disaster are not due to a shortage of funds; they're due to bureaucratic mismanagement. When you figure out how to make a VAT that will address that problem, let me know.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-08-2010, 07:24 PM
 
Location: Sango, TN
24,868 posts, read 24,388,397 times
Reputation: 8672
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergohead View Post
It would bring back ma and pop.

And, I don't view Wall Street as the "economy".
We don't live in a Ma and Pa world.

Ma and Pa can't compete with a billion Chinese.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2010, 04:10 AM
 
Location: between Ath,GR & Mia,FL...
2,574 posts, read 2,488,111 times
Reputation: 327
Ouch...10% - 90%...It hurts...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2010, 08:45 AM
 
10,545 posts, read 13,585,253 times
Reputation: 2823
Quote:
Originally Posted by NewToCA View Post
And to me this is more appropriate. However, I'd ask if you are paying an appropriate share, or are you paying an excessive amount relative to your risk, therefore subsidizing those "on the beach".
I agree. Good question. I would say that there is an attempt to be fair about it. We have rivers etc. around town, so we're required to have flood insurance is based on elevation. It may not be as well planned for homeowners insurance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2010, 09:33 AM
 
Location: NE CT
1,496 posts, read 3,385,843 times
Reputation: 718
Once the VAT tax is established in the US you can be assured it will grow like a disease that it is in Europe. This is not just a one time tax. It is a tax that levels an assessment tax at every step of the production of any good or service in the economy. It is also a hidden tax because the consumer doesn't have to see it as a line item on their sales receipt. It is a tax on the wholesale production brought to market and then incorporated in the price of either a good or a service. Just who is going to add up all of the VAT assessments along the way and then line item them on your sales receipt?

Eliminate the income tax and then we have something to consider as an alternative to the income tax, but adding VAT upon an already overtaxed nation, is inviting even more industry to leave this country for nations that really support industry rather than drive them away with high wages, more and more gov't regulations, unions entitlements, and greedy concepts like VAT legislation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2010, 09:33 AM
 
Location: DFW Texas
3,127 posts, read 7,629,814 times
Reputation: 2256
Hmmmmm that's a difficult question.....Do I want ANOTHER tax on top of the income tax, property & school tax, sales tax, and a multitude of other taxes that bombard me on a daily basis????.............mmmmmmmmm, I think I'll pass.

Instead of adding more tax, why don't our dumba$$ government & president CUT SPENDING!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2010, 09:38 AM
 
Location: The #1 sunshine state, Arizona.
12,169 posts, read 17,647,423 times
Reputation: 64104
Having a VAT would be like inviting a shark to your pool party. No, no, no!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2010, 09:46 AM
 
2,830 posts, read 2,503,562 times
Reputation: 2737
I voted no. As far as I'm concerned we pay enough taxes as a percentage of income already. Rather than add something else, we need to clean up our current expenditures and reallocate some of the existing tax money to pay for something like a disaster fund.

We don't need new taxes, even if they are dressed up like something else to make them look prettier.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2010, 10:55 AM
 
Location: between Ath,GR & Mia,FL...
2,574 posts, read 2,488,111 times
Reputation: 327
Wonderful...almost unanimus opposition to the concept of "new taxes"...

I am so glad that the 3rd rail in USA politics is so...electrified...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-09-2010, 08:28 PM
 
4,399 posts, read 10,671,195 times
Reputation: 2383
Quote:
Originally Posted by ergohead View Post
It's more like 25%.

.
No its not like anything. .2% does not equal 25%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:42 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top