Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oregon > Portland
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-03-2015, 10:41 AM
 
Location: Baker City, Oregon
5,456 posts, read 8,169,998 times
Reputation: 11603

Advertisements

“From vaccinations to fluoride to GMOs, one biologist argues that Portland needs to get back to the lab.”

Are Portlanders Anti-Science? | Portland Monthly

The article doesn't even mention the (false) almost religious belief in the benefits of organic foods:

Little evidence of health benefits from organic foods, Stanford study finds | News Center | Stanford Medicine

Then there's the Progressive version of the Creation Museum:

Whole Foods: America
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-03-2015, 11:09 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,161,783 times
Reputation: 7875
Okay....and your point with this thread?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2015, 11:37 AM
 
47 posts, read 106,100 times
Reputation: 31
I'm guessing his/her point with the thread is similar to most of the other posts, including the recent "Are Native Portlander's Conservative" and "Is there a Significant Crossdresser Population." To spark a discussion that provides further insight into the city in which people live or are considering moving to. A discussion of the "anti-science" label, and whether it's accurate or not, might help identify a characteristic of the city that affects day-to-day living and future policy decisions. Plus, it's just kind of an interesting topic. Not sure whether I agree with the label or not, but I'm going to check out the article.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2015, 11:51 AM
 
Location: The beautiful Rogue Valley, Oregon
7,785 posts, read 18,817,826 times
Reputation: 10783
Quote:
Originally Posted by karlsch View Post
The article doesn't even mention the (false) almost religious belief in the benefits of organic foods:

Little evidence of health benefits from organic foods, Stanford study finds | News Center | Stanford Medicine
Notice the actual results of the meta-analysis (it isn't a study, they did no original research) are muddled, except they are fairly sure that there isn't a significant nutrition benefit to organic foods over conventional. They also say that the research methods in the studies they looked at varied so much that it was difficult to draw a single conclusion.

Then they go on to say that pesticide levels in food can be significantly lower in organic foods, plus there may well be taste benefits to organic. Compare local Oregon organic strawberries to conventional strawberries (the ones that taste like wood pulp) from wherever.

And Whole Foods is a Texas company, lol.

But, hey, go ahead and add it to the specious list of studies to make a very questionable point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2015, 12:13 PM
 
1,376 posts, read 1,312,034 times
Reputation: 1469
Quote:
Originally Posted by karlsch View Post

Then there's the Progressive version of the Creation Museum:

Whole Foods: America
Whole Foods selling pro-biotics or chlorophyll concentrate or goji berries and promoting them for their health benefits(like a lot of health food stores or groceries do) might be based on weak scientific evidence that may or may not prove them to have tangible health benefits. However that's completely different than a Creation Museum--which is basically just a shrine to Christian mythology. Nothing wrong with mythology, it can be fun and entertaining but it's not even pseudoscience. It can be debated only by those who have faith in the myths to begin with.

Also, Whole Foods is all over the US(and other countries), based in Texas, and isn't the sole company that sells products like these, so I'm not sure how it's a specifically a Portland thing. Fred Meyer and Safeway have organic and health supplement isles that carry the same things these days(you can buy pro-biotics in plenty of grocery stores).

The anti-fluoridation and anti-vaccination folks just strike me as a little silly though.

Last edited by CanuckInPortland; 04-03-2015 at 12:24 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2015, 12:16 PM
 
Location: Portland, OR
8,802 posts, read 8,894,702 times
Reputation: 4512
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Okay....and your point with this thread?
This is going to anger you, but Portland isn't perfect. It's ok to post adequately supported and respectfully expressed criticisms of a city for others to get a comprehensive view of what it's like to live here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2015, 02:00 PM
 
4,059 posts, read 5,616,772 times
Reputation: 2892
Quote:
Originally Posted by VTHokieFan View Post
This is going to anger you, but Portland isn't perfect. It's ok to post adequately supported and respectfully expressed criticisms of a city for others to get a comprehensive view of what it's like to live here.
Perhaps I'm putting words in urban's mouth, but I don't think s/he was concerned that the thread is critical of Portland. As an aside, that article is dated yesterday, but I swear I read the same article months ago.

Couple thoughts:

1) There is not one "uniform" Portland. On the vaccination issue, WW ran an article last month showing exemption rates by school district, and there are pockets where exemptions are high, but also large swaths of the city where the vaccination rate is near 100%. Anti-vaccination ideas flourish at Portland private and charter schools.

So it's a bit oversimplistic to paint with this broad a brush and say "Portland is liberal or antiscience or whatever." Though it is interesting that several of the areas we often suggest to newcomers are places where exemptions are the highest. Food for thought.

2) While the author ascribes the defeat of the fluoridation measure to "anti-science" views, I think that too is also quite oversimplified. There's no question fluoridation paranoia was part of its defeat, but a lot of us voted against it for many other reasons: budget concerns, concerns about City Hall's dishonest approach and cost projections, etc.

I actually support fluoridation, but the way that particular measure was floated killed it for me. Right idea, but wrong execution.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2015, 02:57 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,161,783 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by VTHokieFan View Post
This is going to anger you, but Portland isn't perfect. It's ok to post adequately supported and respectfully expressed criticisms of a city for others to get a comprehensive view of what it's like to live here.
Hardly, I was curious what the point of the thread was because it does oversimplify things. I personally think vaccinations are a good thing, as does a majority of people in Portland, but we also think one shouldn't be forced to do something they don't want.

As for organic food, for starters, organic tastes much better, often times costs about the same or not much more unless you are buying something not in season, and why would I want to eat food loaded with growth hormones?

As for the fluoride, I don't see any benefit to it being in the water and making water taste different. A number of toothpastes that are dentist recommended are also bad for your teeth. A little research goes a long way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2015, 04:17 PM
 
1,376 posts, read 1,312,034 times
Reputation: 1469
Also, doesn't the decision to not fluoridate the water in Portland go back to the 1950s? Rather than being a new trend recently, hasn't it been rejected like 4 times or something in public votes since then?

I voted for that measure, but at the same time I could care less, since I brush my teeth regularly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2015, 04:56 PM
 
1,666 posts, read 1,017,293 times
Reputation: 846
The cultural vibe is a little ironic in Portland. They are all about evidence and science when it comes to defending their atheism and agnosticism but one will find the same folks have near religious beliefs about GMO's, organic food and vaccinations despite overwhelming evidence that GMO's aren't harmful, chemicals used on foods will not harm you if ingested at the amounts one would get from food, and vaccinations are so well supported by physicians that they agree on their effectiveness and safety at near 100% rates.

What a world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Settings
X
Data:
Loading data...
Based on 2000-2020 data
Loading data...

123
Hide US histogram


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > Oregon > Portland

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:54 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top