U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Pro Football
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Worst team in the NFL 2010 season
St.Louis Rams 9 18.75%
Oakland Raiders 8 16.67%
Cleveland Browns 5 10.42%
Buffalo Bills 12 25.00%
Detroit Lions 7 14.58%
Tampa Bay Buccaneers 4 8.33%
Some other team 3 6.25%
Voters: 48. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-30-2010, 08:13 AM
 
Location: 32°19'03.7"N 106°43'55.9"W
9,023 posts, read 19,727,439 times
Reputation: 9172

Advertisements

Rather than predict the Super Bowl or conference winners, I thought I'd post this poll, as it's probably more original. With training camps opening, and the threat of no NFL next year, this might be the last year of normalcy for a while. With that said, who is in line to 'earn' the #1 pick of the 2011 NFL draft?
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-30-2010, 08:36 AM
 
Location: Charlotte, NC and Washington, DC
26,430 posts, read 39,744,181 times
Reputation: 40192
Buffalo. They have done nothing to improve the team.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2010, 09:58 AM
 
299 posts, read 880,134 times
Reputation: 268
I think its between Buffalo and Tampa Bay. Neither team did much in the draft and neither signed any free agents of note.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2010, 05:05 PM
YAZ
 
Location: Phoenix,AZ
7,410 posts, read 13,431,503 times
Reputation: 6782
I just hope it isn't the Lions.

Again.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2010, 05:08 PM
 
Location: Asheville
7,555 posts, read 6,846,385 times
Reputation: 6923
It will probably be the Rams
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2010, 06:04 PM
 
909 posts, read 2,897,522 times
Reputation: 253
-Oakland will be better. A lot better.
-Cleveland will still suck, not the worst, but maybe ranked 30th because they are impatient and do not let players develop in their system (Brady Quinn coming off his best year, Derek Anderson being benched for almost all of 2008, Kelen Winslow, and Braylon Edwards)
-The Lions are on the move to become noticable in the NFL, I really like what they are doing to improve their franchise, lets just hope they don't trade their players like Cleveland did.
- The St. Louis Rams have to be atleast a little better with Sam Bradford
- Tampa Bay will still suck, but maybe 31st. The management has made terrible decisions in getting rid of Jeff Garcia, and John, which whom was one of the best coaches in the NFL when he was the Tampa Bay head coach. Plus, if Byron Leftwich can win a game with the Steelers, how come he couldn't win a game with the Bucs? Because the Bucs have horrible talent and a lot of the players are WAY overrated. If the Bucs didn't win the superbowl, than their franchise would look a lot simular to the Detroit Lions, except the Lions finally have some good brains in their management office to bring up the hype of spectacular Ford Field.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2010, 06:33 PM
 
Location: Midwest
4,676 posts, read 4,831,335 times
Reputation: 6810
Cleveland...below average roster + tough schedule=bad record.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2010, 07:16 PM
 
Location: Quiet Corner Connecticut
1,335 posts, read 3,187,258 times
Reputation: 454
Oakland and Cleveland will improve a little. Detroit certainly won't be in the worst five.

Tampa and Buffalo won't be pretty, especially considering they got six games vs. tough in division opponents. Those two and St. Louis should be the bottom three. I'd lean towards St. Louis right now, as I don't think Bradford will be that much of a savior right out the gate.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2010, 08:43 PM
 
Location: Indianapolis
3,681 posts, read 8,761,841 times
Reputation: 2372
It's between Cleveland, Buffalo and Tampa Bay. My best bet is Cleveland, they will SUCK A$$!!!
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-30-2010, 09:35 PM
 
Location: NE Atlanta Metro
3,179 posts, read 5,115,803 times
Reputation: 3061
Rams.

Don't sleep on the Raiders. They could be a playoff contender.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Sports > Pro Football

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:59 AM.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top