
11-12-2012, 10:18 AM
|
|
|
Location: Nantahala National Forest, NC
27,078 posts, read 10,181,522 times
Reputation: 30347
|
|
What happened to the new rules?
Texans got called on that upper body/rough sack to Cutler, but the Texan player stayed in even after Cutler had to leave the game...
|

11-12-2012, 10:21 AM
|
|
|
42,478 posts, read 23,478,817 times
Reputation: 21266
|
|
Is there a rule that says you eject a player for giving a player or QB a concussion? If so, it hasn't been enforced all year.
|

11-12-2012, 10:30 AM
|
|
|
Location: Nantahala National Forest, NC
27,078 posts, read 10,181,522 times
Reputation: 30347
|
|
Hmm, I thought there was, with the increased focus on preventing head injuries... 
|

11-12-2012, 10:45 AM
|
|
|
42,478 posts, read 23,478,817 times
Reputation: 21266
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by greatblueheron
Hmm, I thought there was, with the increased focus on preventing head injuries... 
|
Players have been fined for those types of hits - but I think that's it for now.
|

11-12-2012, 11:28 AM
|
|
|
9,092 posts, read 18,363,836 times
Reputation: 6959
|
|
Yeah ... No ejections by rule
|

11-12-2012, 02:21 PM
|
|
|
Location: NJ
17,578 posts, read 44,515,481 times
Reputation: 16249
|
|
I don't think any such rule exists.
|

11-12-2012, 09:56 PM
|
|
|
4,246 posts, read 11,589,447 times
Reputation: 3149
|
|
No such penalty
|

11-13-2012, 05:40 AM
|
|
|
Location: Atlanta
6,681 posts, read 5,268,165 times
Reputation: 5544
|
|
No such penalty is correct. The league could fine and suspend the player for a game afterwards but not during. Of course the REFs always have the ability to eject a player for unnecessary roughness but they don't typically do that on the first offense and never on a football related hit like that.. more often its related to after the play type of hits like when Ndamukong Suh was ejected for stomping on a player after the play just last season on Thanksgiving Day.
|

11-13-2012, 10:02 AM
|
|
|
Location: Houston, TX
17,030 posts, read 29,658,925 times
Reputation: 16244
|
|
He may get fined but it didnt look like it was intentional.
|

11-13-2012, 10:10 AM
|
|
|
Location: Nantahala National Forest, NC
27,078 posts, read 10,181,522 times
Reputation: 30347
|
|
OH....ok. That clears it up for me.
But still...wasn't the hit above the waist? That was not intentional? And the Texan was called for "unnecessary roughness" but that was offset by a Bears penalty, was it not?
Well, as a former RN-worked in ICU with trauma/ brain-injured patients, I wish for more rules or penalties to be set in the future. The aftermath of a TBI can be devastating...and permanent.
Anyway,
Quote:
Originally Posted by mco65
No such penalty is correct. The league could fine and suspend the player for a game afterwards but not during. Of course the REFs always have the ability to eject a player for unnecessary roughness but they don't typically do that on the first offense and never on a football related hit like that.. more often its related to after the play type of hits like when Ndamukong Suh was ejected for stomping on a player after the play just last season on Thanksgiving Day.
|
|
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
|
|