U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Shopping and Consumer Products > Product Reviews
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Old 07-12-2011, 03:22 AM
2,186 posts, read 7,795,427 times


Canon PIXMA MX Printer

Rating: 5 out of 5
  • Currently 5.0/5.0

As a firm believer in all things Canon, I purchased this printer from their online store last year, for $488+. It is their PIXMA MX 700 model. Apparently introduced on the market in 2007, CNET gave it a 4-star rating, because it was missing the duplex and advanced fax features. Interesting to note that several users gave it a poor 2-star award. I have a suspicion that some people don't like to read instructions, and blame machines for "misbehaving" when, in fact, instructions have been neglected. It's a sleek, dark gray with a simple metallic edge line and is a solidly built machine. There's a cover over the automatic document feeder that keeps that area free of dust. I keep a piece of heavy-duty plastic over the whole thing for that purpose as the ejection space in front is large. Speaking of the ejection space, it's really handy that everything, the top opening, operating panel and ejection space are so conveniently located that it can sit width-wise on the counter--so the finished copies are coming out with room to spare.
The printing quality is excellent and it has a 30-sheet capacity. Since it's not quite a year old, all I can say is that it's been very reliable as of this date, and performs exactly as expected. Once understood, the functionality is apparent and again, reading the instructions is what determines the successful use of this machine. I work at home, so the only drawback is that it uses ink fairly quickly. To save ink, I keep the properties on "grayscale" printing and it still produces an easily read document. As an ink jet model, the print product is handsome and exceeded my expectations. The "bleed factor" is not apparent until it's put under a heavy-duty magnifying glass, and the color prints are wonderful, if the right paper is used. You can't expect a gorgeous print on cheap paper. The Canon will perform, but it requires attention to details when calling on its capabilities.

Review by professional reviewer, Dec. 8, 2010
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Shopping and Consumer Products > Product Reviews
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2022, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top