Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Psychology
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-17-2017, 04:30 PM
 
9,470 posts, read 9,373,019 times
Reputation: 8178

Advertisements

My sister-in-law is what some people would call a "dumb bunny." (A perfectly nice person, though.) She is not smart, but she has wonderful taste. Her home is beautifully decorated, color coordinated, and even written up in the newspaper, complete with photos. She dresses in lovely clothes, perfectly coordinated, with appropriate jewelry, handbags and shoes. But I am positive she has a lower level IQ.

So no, I don't think taste and stylish dressing or decorating necessarily equate to intelligence.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-17-2017, 05:16 PM
 
Location: Toronto
6,750 posts, read 5,725,072 times
Reputation: 4619
Default No!

Quote:
Originally Posted by EvilCookie View Post
So even though I'm basing this off some personal experiences, I want it just to be a discussion thread out of curiosity, not a passing of judgement - so please refrain from flaming and don't go off accusing me of being a snob or shallow or judgmental or whatever. I know people of all intelligence levels can be great people, so no need to point it out. But this is just a correlation that I've observed. We're all taught not to judge a book by its cover, and that 'taste' in things like clothing, decor, art, even food is very subjective. But I find that in general, what is universally considered 'good' taste in these things generally tends to go with the person's overall intelligence level - which, by the way, is not necessarily defined by their profession or education.

In fact, I find these things are a MORE accurate predictor of intelligence than education or career. It's an interesting phenomenon that has often puzzled me, and I can't quite put my finger on it. I've known people who were educated and had successful careers; and yet, they had a certain close-mindness, a narrow view of the world and a constrained way of thinking that I would more likely associate with someone from an uneducated background; a type of 'simpleton' attitude, as snobby as that sounds. At the same time I've met people who were not particularly successful financially or career-wise yet showed the ability to converse intelligently and think deeply and openly on a variety of topics.

What I did notice, is that quite often, the way a person chooses to dress, or the way they decorate their home, speaks of that intelligence level quite accurately. I'm not talking about someone who pays no attention to what they wear, and are just happy to throw on a tshirt and jeans, and furnish their home with some simple cheap pieces just for function. Some people don't care and that's fine. Other people put a lot of thought into how they present themselves and their home - and it's those people who put a lot of time and effort, and sometimes money into it, and yet come out with bad results, that I find really lack a certain level of sophistication. I'm talking about things like draping yourself with blingy designer logos all over the place (especially fake, but even real), or simply a bunch of very attention-grabbing pieces that compete for attention and don't go together; clothes that are overly revealing or 'trashy' for women, anything that has a connotation of being sleazy or overdoing it with flashy jewelry or way too much makeup. Think the 'nouveau-riche' look, or the blinged-out rapper look, or the "Jersey Shore" look etc. Same with homes that are loaded up with a mishmash of heavy furniture, a ton of decor, knick-knacks everywhere, and cheap cheesy things all over the place like words on the wall or bad 'art' prints, huge fake floral arrangements etc. Hard to explain, but it's not so much about anything specific but more where you can just see that a person is trying to cram in as much of everything as possible to show off. Same goes for people who, for example, disdain trying any new or ethnic cuisines or claiming to avoid something just because it's too healthy or whatever; the sort of people who would seek out a McDonald's or Denny's when traveling abroad even in places known for excellent local food. It's absolutely shallow and superficial, but somehow I just can't see a person who is truly mentally bright and intelligent making these sorts of choices - and from personal experience, I've been right about this every single time I've gotten to know the person better. Again - this is not to judge the person's character at all.

Thoughts? Do you agree?
Oh god NO! I know lots of people that are dumb as a door nail that have fab taste and many people that are very smart/ book smart but could not put a tasteful dinner party, gift or outfit together. Some people have both traits and some have neither. I don't think they are related. Though a really smart people who was self aware would pay someone to do the leg work for them to pull of something that required good taste .
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-17-2017, 05:23 PM
 
Location: SoCal
14,530 posts, read 20,124,163 times
Reputation: 10539
There you go! People who are smart may or may not have good taste, but the truly smart would just hire a consultant who has good taste and follow their advice! Good one!

Smart people know when it's time to throw money at problems!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2017, 12:58 AM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
18,813 posts, read 32,500,469 times
Reputation: 38576
My friends actually say things like, "We come to see you, not your house."

I feel sorry for people who spend more time worrying about the appearance of their taste, than spending time with real friends.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2017, 06:04 AM
 
Location: Wonderland
67,650 posts, read 60,914,057 times
Reputation: 101078
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoMoreSnowForMe View Post
My friends actually say things like, "We come to see you, not your house."

I feel sorry for people who spend more time worrying about the appearance of their taste, than spending time with real friends.
Amen.

The OP never answered my question, by the way, which was "What sort of style do you believe is indicative of high intelligence/good taste?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2017, 06:13 AM
 
Location: Coastal Georgia
50,371 posts, read 63,977,343 times
Reputation: 93344
I am late to this party, but I do not perceive a link between intelligence and taste. If anything, it seems to me that there is a tendency for smart people to be busy, preoccupied people. They want things that function in their lives, but dont care very much what those things look like. These people also have self esteem and confidence, so the idea of putting forth a certain image for others doesn't concern them.
I think some people who have good taste are smart, but it isnt because they are smart.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2017, 06:32 AM
 
Location: Where the sun likes to shine!!
20,548 posts, read 30,394,464 times
Reputation: 88950
Quote:
Originally Posted by gentlearts View Post
They want things that function in their lives, but dont care very much what those things look like.

I have a saying for this and after redoing a lot of houses and building our own off gird house….practicality and looks don't usually go hand in hand. Most times when I buy something in the house for looks it a useless piece of eye candy. I then end up get rid of it and replacing it with something that works better but may not be as pretty
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-20-2017, 09:26 AM
 
3,217 posts, read 2,431,190 times
Reputation: 6328
George Bernard Shaw
“...a man of great common sense and good taste, meaning thereby a man without originality or moral courage.”

Jeff Goldblum
As soon as you're interested in what is good taste, then you're in bad taste land already. What's comfortable and what represents your life, what's unique and individual about you, that's style.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-22-2017, 05:16 PM
 
5,126 posts, read 7,409,420 times
Reputation: 8396
Quote:
Originally Posted by SimplySagacious View Post

I think you are equating intelligence with cultural backgrounds and experiences. Sophistication correlates with knowledge, not IQ.

I have two friends who think that Art Nouveau architecture and design are creepy and scary. It didn't take much digging to learn that their perceptions came solely from ghost and horror stories/films. Those were their only childhood experiences with it so their dislike for it was formed for life.
You nailed it.

Sophistication results from exposure. Creativity results from intelligence.

In other words, a person of average intellect might have great taste due to exposure.

A person of above average intellect might have great taste due to exposure, with the addition of putting it all together more creatively.

As someone else has said, there are different kinds of intelligence. Many forms of intelligence have nothing to do with visual things, so those people might not remotely care about taste. An artist or architect has a visual type of intelligence and can't help but care.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-25-2017, 03:42 PM
 
Location: Type 0.73 Kardashev
11,110 posts, read 9,812,975 times
Reputation: 40166
Intellect is a measurable, quantifiable attribute.

Taste is nothing of the sort. Taste is merely a subjective preference.

Intelligent people tend (to those whose typing fingers are getting itchy, understand the meaning of the word tend) to be more successful. They thus tend to have more resources to throw at currently trending standards of 'taste' (which invariably are costlier than what is deemed to lack taste). Thus, intelligent people - who tend to have means - will be more likely than unintelligent people - who tend to have less means - to acquire the accoutrements of 'taste'.

That's not 'having taste'; it's 'having the money to spend on the predominating fashions'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Psychology

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:30 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top