Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Psychology
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-13-2017, 08:27 PM
 
Location: Gulf Coast
1,257 posts, read 887,754 times
Reputation: 2011

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by WriterDude View Post
Yes. They don't talk about the topic (a restaurant for dinner) but instead talk about the person (don't listen to that snobby so-and-so).

It takes some practice, but watch for topic shifts. Any time you see the topic shift, someone's shifting it for a reason...But every time someone changes the topic from thing A to another poster, that's a troll move.
Good information. What is their motive? Getting a thread shut down? How should we respond?

If we put them on ignore or walk away, they feel vindicated and will just continue to harass
other people.

If we report them nothing is usually done.

If we call them out and stand our ground, they just keep going and going until the thread gets shut down.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-13-2017, 08:41 PM
 
Location: Wonderland
67,650 posts, read 60,844,304 times
Reputation: 101073
Quote:
Originally Posted by WriterDude View Post
I think it's 100% about status. Someone gains status through influence. They misunderstand the nature of influence, assuming that it's zero-sum, and that diminishing someone's contribution is the same thing as providing that contribution in the first place. This is why a troll trolls.

In most cases, they're driven by their own lack of real ability to contribute. They're not able to be funny, or punchy, or insightful, and are supremely jealous of those who are.

Let's say someone posts a comment. If the comment is coherent and meaningful, insightful in some way, offers information or helps to define meaning, it generates influence and provides status to the poster. Trolls think of status as zero-sum, in the sense that if someone is gaining influence, they must therefore be losing influence. So they take the OP's post as diminishing them, a form of attack. To defend themselves, they must lash out to sustain their influence state. That lashing out will include things like ad hominem attacks, irrational off-topic rants, deliberate misreadings, and sly innuendo-laced derogatory remarks - anything they think will offset the status the original poster gained by making their post.

They're also acutely aware of high-profile posters who have developed a certain influence and authority within a particular online community. By counting coup on a high-status individual, they feel they gain a disproportionate amount of status in return.

This is the distinction between trolling and over-the-top opinionated posting. Usually an opinionated poster will direct comments to a topic. They may provide evidence, commentary, or perspective, because their rhetorical purpose is to establish or refute a position. The troll directs comments based on a wholly different rhetorical purpose - to diminish the person who posted. So they'll comment to attack the authority of the OP, they'll comment to attack their message or their meaning. They'll claim the OP was irrelevant, irrational, incoherent, unhinged in some way, because their objective isn't to argue the point, but to knock the ground out from the OP.

Then when the trolling behavior generates a certain amount of ill will, the troll takes the ill will as evidence that they've gained status as an influencer. They've "set things straight" or "put that uppity-so-and-so in their place," and restored the status balance to where it was before the OP's post. They get a disproportionate amount of satisfaction from the disruption, because it ensures that nobody has an opportunity to build status - everything turns into a comment to or about the troll, and any attempt to get back on topic will be greeted by more trolling.

They're irrational in this way, maybe even vaguely sociopathic, because they're motivated by the emotional response, not by usual human measures in a community such as acceptance or agreement. They assume the OP was posting from their motivation as well, just to get that emotional response - so in some ways they see *everyone* posting as some kind of troll.
Wow, you really hit it out of the ballpark with this post. I agree with all of it, but especially the bolded parts. I see a LOT of this sort of behavior on forums.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2017, 08:46 PM
 
Location: Gulf Coast
1,257 posts, read 887,754 times
Reputation: 2011
I also can't stand it when someone posts on a thread just to say:

"Who cares?! Why would anyone care about that?!"

I mean, if you don't care, why did you bother posting?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2017, 09:18 PM
 
Location: A Yankee in northeast TN
16,066 posts, read 21,119,732 times
Reputation: 43615
Quote:
Originally Posted by hopefulone View Post
But neither should it be a place to rile people up and to be nasty in responses. Hence the TOS:

"Be civil, no personal attacks, flaming, or insults. We may attack ideas (politely) but we do not attack the speaker of the idea."
True, but lets take the question of sexual pressure again. If someone was to respond with the advice that they felt waiting for marriage wasn't important there is absolutely nothing in that response that is uncivil, insulting, or nasty in any way. Yet here we are with posters saying that would be an inappropriate response, because it doesn't fit with what they think is proper. It's not pot stirring. It's not trolling. It's a valid opinion and perfectly acceptable as a response, even if it's not a popular or helpful opinion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2017, 09:31 PM
 
Location: Wonderland
67,650 posts, read 60,844,304 times
Reputation: 101073
Well, I hate to put anyone on an Ignore list, mainly because I have a high tolerance level for BS apparently, but I just decided to put a pack of peterpiperpickledpepperpickers on ignore and I feel better already.

I enjoy posting in various subsections of this forum and believe me, I can tell the difference between disagreement or spirited discussion vs trolling - I think most people can. Sometimes it's easier to just enact Ye Olde Ignore Function than it is to hope that reason or justice will prevail.

As for what motivates some people to troll, I think it must boil down to very deep seated insecurity and a feeling of very low self worth. It's actually pitiful - and if their behavior wasn't so destructive I would find it sad. But it disrupts conversations between people who are truly interested in whatever the topic is, not in insulting or bullying other people, and I think allowing it to continue really degrades a site.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2017, 09:33 PM
 
Location: Gulf Coast
1,257 posts, read 887,754 times
Reputation: 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by DubbleT View Post
True, but lets take the question of sexual pressure again. If someone was to respond with the advice that they felt waiting for marriage wasn't important there is absolutely nothing in that response that is uncivil, insulting, or nasty in any way. Yet here we are with posters saying that would be an inappropriate response, because it doesn't fit with what they think is proper. It's not pot stirring. It's not trolling. It's a valid opinion and perfectly acceptable as a response, even if it's not a popular or helpful opinion.

But the thread isn't about YOU. It doesn't matter if waiting until marriage isn't important to YOU ... it's important to the OP. The one who is asking for advice. NOT advice on whether to wait, that has already been decided.

You don't tell the Orthodox Jew to eat the pork, just because you don't think it matters very much.

This is mind-blindness, just dumping your opinions on someone with no consideration for them.

How do you not see how wrong that is?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2017, 09:39 PM
 
Location: A Yankee in northeast TN
16,066 posts, read 21,119,732 times
Reputation: 43615
Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthernProper View Post
But the thread isn't about YOU. It doesn't matter if waiting until marriage isn't important to YOU ... it's important to the OP. The one who is asking for advice. NOT advice on whether to wait, that has already been decided.

You don't tell the Orthodox Jew to eat the pork, just because you don't think it matters very much.

This is mind-blindness, just dumping your opinions on someone with no consideration for them.

How do you not see how wrong that is?
Because you don't know what the respondent has been through or what they might be thinking or believing. They may have a deep heartfelt belief that it is better not to wait, maybe they had that experience and it turned out badly for them. Whatever their reason is, they have the right to state it without being called a troll for doing so. They aren't being rude, uncivil, attacking or anything of the sort. People who start threads don't get to make the rules and decide who can participate or what sorts of responses they get. That's kind of the whole point I'm trying to make. Whether you or I or anyone else feels this is right or wrong has no bearing on it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2017, 09:45 PM
 
Location: Gulf Coast
1,257 posts, read 887,754 times
Reputation: 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by DubbleT View Post
Because you don't know what the respondent has been through or what they might be thinking or believing. They may have a deep heartfelt belief that it is better not to wait, maybe they had that experience and it turned out badly for them. Whatever their reason is, they have the right to state it without being called a troll for doing so. They aren't being rude, uncivil, attacking or anything of the sort. People who start threads don't get to make the rules and decide who can participate or what sorts of responses they get. That's kind of the whole point I'm trying to make. Whether you or I or anyone else feels this is right or wrong has no bearing on it.
Who cares if "so and so tried that and it didn't work for them"? If someone believes they are obeying God, who do you think you are to talk them out of it, because you tried that once?

It's not answering the OP's request for advice on how to handle being pressured by someone, it's just dumping your thoughts on them about their decision. Zero empathy, zero help. But at least you told them how YOU feel.

If a Muslim was struggling with understanding the Koran and needed advice, would you tell them you tried being a Muslim once and it didn't work for you so they should just stop being Muslim?

You see how ignorant that is?

LOW HANGING FRUIT.

Last edited by SouthernProper; 10-13-2017 at 09:54 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2017, 10:07 PM
 
Location: A Yankee in northeast TN
16,066 posts, read 21,119,732 times
Reputation: 43615
Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthernProper View Post
Who cares if "so and so tried that and it didn't work for them"? If someone believes they are obeying God, who do you think you are to talk them out of it, because you tried that once?

It's not answering the OP's request for advice on how to handle being pressured by someone, it's just dumping your thoughts on them about their decision. Zero empathy, zero help. But at least you told them how YOU feel.

If a Muslim was struggling with understanding the Koran and needed advice, would you tell them you tried being a Muslim once and it didn't work for you so they should just stop being Muslim?

You see how ignorant that is?

LOW HANGING FRUIT.
Still missing the point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-13-2017, 10:14 PM
 
Location: Gulf Coast
1,257 posts, read 887,754 times
Reputation: 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by DubbleT View Post
Still missing the point.
Suffice it to say, you are free to post whatever you want on a thread. Whether or not it is helpful at all to the OP seems to be irrelevant to you, as long as you get your say.

I think it's completely disrespectful to use someone's thread ... not to help them ... but to suggest they compromise their beliefs, just because you don't happen to share them.

But if that's how you roll, knock yourself out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Psychology
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:25 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top