Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary
 [Register]
Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary The Triangle Area
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 10-08-2017, 07:15 AM
 
Location: Danville, VA
7,190 posts, read 6,823,240 times
Reputation: 4824

Advertisements

NCDOT mulls I-87 route to Currituck - Daily Advance
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-08-2017, 09:25 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
6,654 posts, read 5,589,525 times
Reputation: 5537
Quote:
Originally Posted by LM117 View Post
wonder what the reasons for the Currituck route are
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2017, 11:17 AM
 
Location: Danville, VA
7,190 posts, read 6,823,240 times
Reputation: 4824
Quote:
Originally Posted by pierretong1991 View Post
wonder what the reasons for the Currituck route are
Virginia is leaning towards it because it would be a lot cheaper for them to upgrade VA-168, which is already a fully controlled-access highway, to interstate standards than it would US-17, which still has at-grades surrounded by businesses in Chesapeake. The city of Chesapeake isn't fond of the idea, likely because it would mix I-87 traffic with Outer Banks traffic.

The problem with that connector is that it would cross miles of wetlands, which would make it very difficult for NCDOT to convince the Army Corps of Engineers to grant a permit, when there's an existing upgradable 4-lane highway (US-17) nearby. I don't see that connector happening for that reason alone.

That being said, I think that connector would be very useful as a detour route if there was ever a traffic backup on US-17 in VA (accidents, construction, etc.).

Both states are in a Catch-22. VA-168 is the best route for VA and US-17 is the best route for NC. It'll be interesting to see how this plays out.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2017, 12:12 PM
 
Location: Lizard Lick, NC
6,344 posts, read 4,406,867 times
Reputation: 1996
Starting to sound like a dead end? Any chance the whole project gets canned? I think Virginia will just pay up in the end because there proposed route will not happen
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2017, 02:28 PM
 
Location: Danville, VA
7,190 posts, read 6,823,240 times
Reputation: 4824
Quote:
Originally Posted by muslim12 View Post
Starting to sound like a dead end? Any chance the whole project gets canned? I think Virginia will just pay up in the end because there proposed route will not happen
No chance of it getting canned. There's too much support for it in eastern NC and Hampton Roads.

I agree that Virginia will likely wind up having to pony up the extra dollars to upgrade US-17 if they intend on bringing I-87 to Norfolk. They must be nuts if they think the Army Corps of Engineers would ever approve a wetlands permit for NCDOT to build the connector when there's already an existing highway.

Then again, VA is the same state that blew millions on a proposed toll road paralleling US-460 between Petersburg and Suffolk without ever getting a permit from the Army Corps of Engineers beforehand and without ever breaking ground. This article is a lesson on what not to do in the future. Check it out if you're interested.

Book closes on U.S. 460 project at $260 million cost to state | Virginia | richmond.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2017, 03:34 PM
 
Location: Lizard Lick, NC
6,344 posts, read 4,406,867 times
Reputation: 1996
Quote:
Originally Posted by LM117 View Post
No chance of it getting canned. There's too much support for it in eastern NC and Hampton Roads.

I agree that Virginia will likely wind up having to pony up the extra dollars to upgrade US-17 if they intend on bringing I-87 to Norfolk. They must be nuts if they think the Army Corps of Engineers would ever approve a wetlands permit for NCDOT to build the connector when there's already an existing highway.

Then again, VA is the same state that blew millions on a proposed toll road paralleling US-460 between Petersburg and Suffolk without ever getting a permit from the Army Corps of Engineers beforehand and without ever breaking ground. This article is a lesson on what not to do in the future. Check it out if you're interested.

Book closes on U.S. 460 project at $260 million cost to state | Virginia | richmond.com
Wtfff, how did the army corps of engineers not know? How do you build a ****ing road and no body really notices? Is there not any rule against a state doing this without a permit?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2017, 04:43 PM
 
Location: Danville, VA
7,190 posts, read 6,823,240 times
Reputation: 4824
Quote:
Originally Posted by muslim12 View Post
Wtfff, how did the army corps of engineers not know? How do you build a ****ing road and no body really notices? Is there not any rule against a state doing this without a permit?
The toll road was never actually built. VDOT, at the urging of former VA governor Bob McDonnell, paid millions to a contractor to design and build the road without ever getting the permit first because they assumed that the ACoE wouldn't have a problem granting the permit. VDOT was wrong. The ACoE denied the permit and the project was stopped before construction even began. It was a huge black eye on VDOT and Bob McDonnell. The previous Secretary of Transportation was incompetent as hell, too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-08-2017, 06:01 PM
 
9,576 posts, read 7,334,337 times
Reputation: 14004
Quote:
Originally Posted by LM117 View Post
The toll road was never actually built. VDOT, at the urging of former VA governor Bob McDonnell, paid millions to a contractor to design and build the road without ever getting the permit first because they assumed that the ACoE wouldn't have a problem granting the permit. VDOT was wrong. The ACoE denied the permit and the project was stopped before construction even began. It was a huge black eye on VDOT and Bob McDonnell. The previous Secretary of Transportation was incompetent as hell, too.
They could have used that money to upgrade US-17 to interstate standards!

Looking at Google Maps from Grassfield Parkway south on US-17, it doesn't look that bad engineering-wise in order to upgrade the road to interstate standards, some new interchanges/frontage roads, widening shoulders and adding some lanes here and there, it's not like they have to build an entire bypass around a part of a town/city with a new ROW, like they have to do at the current end of I-795 in Goldsboro.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-09-2017, 05:29 PM
 
378 posts, read 419,021 times
Reputation: 74
I want to see them put lighting at every interchange, so you can have a nice bright fun ride from Norfolk to Raleigh.

And is I-87 gonna replace I-464 or run on I-64 to the Chesapeake Bay Bridge Tunnel?

https://prnt.sc/gvej8n

I'd hate to see I-87 replace I-464 because it would look retarded to see I-87 in two different locations. They should run it all the way to New York.

The red alternative is the first one in my opinion. The green one is doable if they can't upgrade US-13 on the Eastern Shore.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-10-2017, 07:34 PM
 
Location: Danville, VA
7,190 posts, read 6,823,240 times
Reputation: 4824
The minutes from AASHTO's recent fall meeting have been posted. No requests were made regarding I-87 and I-42. No surprise with I-87 since only the Knightdale Bypass meets interstate standards and is already signed.

However, the fact that no requests were made to sign the US-70 Clayton and Goldsboro bypasses as I-42 was surprising since they meet interstate standards.

https://route.transportation.org/wp-...oenix-2017.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:37 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top