Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary
 [Register]
Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary The Triangle Area
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 11-06-2018, 02:17 PM
 
Location: Apex, NC
1,370 posts, read 1,069,542 times
Reputation: 1791

Advertisements

Good luck tonight to the Canes. I’ll be pulling for my Blues, but wouldn’t be surprised to see this game end up 5-2 Canes or 5-2 Blues. Just no idea what kind of Blues team is ever going to show up, and unfortunately Jake Allen is terrible...always.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-06-2018, 03:08 PM
 
Location: Cary, NC
43,279 posts, read 77,092,464 times
Reputation: 45632
Quote:
Originally Posted by STL2006 View Post
Good luck tonight to the Canes. I’ll be pulling for my Blues, but wouldn’t be surprised to see this game end up 5-2 Canes or 5-2 Blues. Just no idea what kind of Blues team is ever going to show up, and unfortunately Jake Allen is terrible...always.
We'll have McElhinney in net, so hoping he is fresh and has some bounce.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2018, 03:50 PM
 
Location: Apex, NC
1,370 posts, read 1,069,542 times
Reputation: 1791
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeJaquish View Post
We'll have McElhinney in net, so hoping he is fresh and has some bounce.
Jake Allen makes the idea of playing with 6 skaters and no goalie for 60 mins a real argument.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2018, 05:58 PM
 
Location: Apex, NC
1,370 posts, read 1,069,542 times
Reputation: 1791
Good news for the Blues, no Jake Allen. Good news for the Canes, Chad Johnson might be worse.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-06-2018, 08:38 PM
 
1,206 posts, read 1,054,412 times
Reputation: 734
Quote:
Originally Posted by STL2006 View Post
Good news for the Blues, no Jake Allen. Good news for the Canes, Chad Johnson might be worse.
.870 or so save percentage going in..... 38 shots faced... 37 saves. The Canes sure are excelling at making bad opposing goalies look good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2018, 05:24 AM
 
4,261 posts, read 4,712,159 times
Reputation: 4084
No comfort from the boxscore. Season-to-date save percentages for the three Canes goalies are .880, .884, and .893. That's actually worse than last season. Either these numbers get better quickly, or the Canes had better score more. They rank 27th in the league in goals per game.

One could argue that the goalies have bad numbers because the Canes rank 29th in the league on PK, but the argument can be made other way around.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2018, 07:03 AM
 
Location: Apex, NC
1,370 posts, read 1,069,542 times
Reputation: 1791
Quote:
Originally Posted by HRVT View Post
.870 or so save percentage going in..... 38 shots faced... 37 saves. The Canes sure are excelling at making bad opposing goalies look good.
Blues are a Top 5 scoring team in the NHL, so it’s not surprising the Canes would give up 4 goals. I actually thought the Canes D was very effective and had the Blues confused all night. It appeared to me that the Canes are one of those teams where the quantity of shots doesn’t equal quality. They rarely screened Johnson (did on the PP goal they scored), and most shots were from distance or clean looks for the Blues goalie. I know it’s cliche, but they have to get bodies in front of the net.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2018, 07:23 AM
 
Location: Cary, NC
43,279 posts, read 77,092,464 times
Reputation: 45632
Quote:
Originally Posted by STL2006 View Post
Blues are a Top 5 scoring team in the NHL, so it’s not surprising the Canes would give up 4 goals. I actually thought the Canes D was very effective and had the Blues confused all night. It appeared to me that the Canes are one of those teams where the quantity of shots doesn’t equal quality. They rarely screened Johnson (did on the PP goal they scored), and most shots were from distance or clean looks for the Blues goalie. I know it’s cliche, but they have to get bodies in front of the net.
And, they know that too. It's frustrating to watch sometimes.

Is there a stat for hitting the posts? We seem to have a knack.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2018, 04:13 PM
Status: "Go Canes!!!!" (set 21 hours ago)
 
Location: Planet Earth
8,804 posts, read 10,242,030 times
Reputation: 6833
This is getting really old. 4th straight season outshooting the other team and still losing by sometimes 2 or more, but almost always in regulation.

I don't think RBA can handle this head coaching gig, I really wish they could have found anyone else at this point because it's going to be a bad taste in everyones mouth when they eventually have to cut ties.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-07-2018, 05:35 PM
 
1,206 posts, read 1,054,412 times
Reputation: 734
Quote:
Originally Posted by STL2006 View Post
Blues are a Top 5 scoring team in the NHL, so it’s not surprising the Canes would give up 4 goals. I actually thought the Canes D was very effective and had the Blues confused all night. It appeared to me that the Canes are one of those teams where the quantity of shots doesn’t equal quality. They rarely screened Johnson (did on the PP goal they scored), and most shots were from distance or clean looks for the Blues goalie. I know it’s cliche, but they have to get bodies in front of the net.
That's just it. The four goals given up didn't surprise me at all. It's the fact that we didn't score anything other than the one goal. But it appears that the Canes are shooting for the sake of shooting rather than having a strategy for getting a good look at the net.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:39 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top