Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary
 [Register]
Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary The Triangle Area
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 05-19-2009, 07:42 AM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,143,800 times
Reputation: 14762

Advertisements

Queens University in Charlotte conducted a study about college performance among the State's urban school district graduates. The Study included Wake, Mecklenburg, Guilford, Forsyth and Durham Counties. The study was based on student performance/graduation rates at UNC system campuses. Wake came out on top. See these links for details.
WakeEd - Wake tops other urban districts in UNC system performance | newsobserver.com blogs
Wake's grads do best in college - Local & State - News & Observer (http://www.newsobserver.com/news/story/1533167.html - broken link)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-19-2009, 08:06 AM
 
Location: Virginia (again)
2,697 posts, read 8,693,412 times
Reputation: 1565
It would be more useful if they controlled for things like family income, family education, etc (look at the demographics of the counties they are comparing and you'll see that Wake County is more affluent, less diverse, etc.). Large parts of Wake County are far from urban. Attributing the "success" of Wake County students to the diversity policy is a stretch (i.e., there are other varibles that may explain there success).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2009, 10:03 AM
 
Location: Durham, NC
2,586 posts, read 9,099,725 times
Reputation: 1719
Quote:
Originally Posted by sls76 View Post
It would be more useful if they controlled for things like family income, family education, etc (look at the demographics of the counties they are comparing and you'll see that Wake County is more affluent, less diverse, etc.). Large parts of Wake County are far from urban. Attributing the "success" of Wake County students to the diversity policy is a stretch (i.e., there are other varibles that may explain there success).
So true! Unfortunately I must spread some rep points around, so I cannot give you one for this excellent post!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-19-2009, 11:23 AM
 
Location: South Beach and DT Raleigh
13,966 posts, read 24,143,800 times
Reputation: 14762
Quote:
Originally Posted by sls76 View Post
It would be more useful if they controlled for things like family income, family education, etc (look at the demographics of the counties they are comparing and you'll see that Wake County is more affluent, less diverse, etc.). Large parts of Wake County are far from urban. Attributing the "success" of Wake County students to the diversity policy is a stretch (i.e., there are other varibles that may explain there success).
I agree with you. It would be good if there were more data points. Nonetheless, it's remarkable that the largest system in the state performs so well in comparison to the other large systems in the state.
Regarding the systems being "urban", that's probably a poor choice of words on the part of Queens Univ. or the reporting of the study. What they should have said is "county wide systems built around the largest cities in the state" or something like that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-21-2009, 09:13 PM
 
Location: Charlotte
2,445 posts, read 7,449,778 times
Reputation: 1406
For those that are interested, here is the study. Latest Research: "To a Culture of No Excuses" It focuses a lot on CMS graduates.

Executive Summary (http://www.queens.edu/pdf/upload/academics/ExecSummaryNoExcuses.pdf - broken link) Nice chart on page 4.

Quote:
•A higher percentage of Wake County students actually enrolled in one of the UNC
schools than did students from CMS, Durham, Guilford, and Forsyth Counties.

Out of those who applied, the percentage of those accepted is approximately equal among
these urban districts (between 80% and 85%). The percentage of those accepted who
enrolled was quite high for all districts (between 70% and 80%). However, because a larger
percentage of students from Wake County applied for admissions, the number of all their
high school graduates who enrolled was considerably higher than that of the other urban
districts.
Quote:
• Even though the gap may be closing somewhat, CMS students continue to lag behind
Wake County students in performance in the UNC system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:




Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > U.S. Forums > North Carolina > Raleigh, Durham, Chapel Hill, Cary
Similar Threads
View detailed profiles of:

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:52 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top