U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Real Estate Professionals
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-02-2014, 09:18 AM
 
401 posts, read 863,035 times
Reputation: 330

Advertisements

Morning...OK...recently licensed I have a question about Dual Agency. In my state of Virginia that transaction is allowed however recent post licensing courses strongly discourage the practice for obvious reasons.

Here is my confusion. Our realtor signs have our phone numbers only, therefore the potential for a customer to contact me directly are pretty high. I was attending an Agency Law class the other day and the discussion of dual agency was covered.

The instructor stated that if a customer contacts me directly, after I disclose to them that I represent the seller and they are not represented I can show them the home and answer general questions. Here is where I am concerned. My current listing agreement states no dual agency. So where do I draw the line with the customer. The instructor stated that they should be referred to another agent in the office {as the broker would want this}. So if this is the case and they are ok with being handed off..does that automatically become a buyers agency situation in my own office? We are small and walls are thin. In less I misunderstood, it sounded like the in house second agent would not really be a buyers agent if no other homes were involved therefore the other 3% buyers commission would be lower..?

Not to dis on my broker or office mates, seems like there are varying views how some things should go...I do not want to get into trouble nor not provide my client with the best service.

One other quick question is I am assuming that I am to keep my own files, locked up..what if any info is my office AB and Broker allowed to maintain. Both are working agents..

Thank you so much
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-02-2014, 09:34 AM
 
Location: Inman Park (Atlanta, GA)
21,870 posts, read 14,485,419 times
Reputation: 14312
In Georgia we are allowed Dual Agency but my office does not allow it. Think about it, how can you get the best price for your Seller and it also be the best price for your Buyer? More than anything, you don't want to confuse your client or customer. You have specific fiduciary responsibilities to your client (the person(s) that you have a written agreement for representation) than you do to a customer. In the past if I am representing the Seller as a client and the Buyer is unrepresented and chooses not to seek representation, I have the Buyer sign a form stating that they are a customer.

You are describing designated agency if you refer an unrepresented buyer to someone else in your agency. The buyer will become a client of the designated agent and thus have representation and you will share the commission with the buyer's agent. It does not matter how many properties that the new Buyer's Agent showed the buyer - that is between the two of them.

There is no information in my files that would "tip off" anything to a Buyer's Agent. I don't make the decision on what a Seller will accept so even if there was a snoopy agent that was representing a Buyer on my property, what information would they find other than the listing agreement and the tax records?
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2014, 09:34 AM
 
Location: Cary, NC
41,260 posts, read 71,590,725 times
Reputation: 42884
You absolutely need to ask your broker. You are working through your firm, and firm policies rule. I believe that your broker can require any information desired from you, unless you are representing opposite sides of the same transaction as fiduciaries.

Does Virginia not allow you to represent the seller and work with an unrepresented buyer, as long as you have written confirmation from the buyer that you represent only the seller?
Of course, from a liability standpoint, you may be farther ahead to refer the unrepresented buyer to another agent, possibly outside your firm.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2014, 10:45 AM
 
Location: Salem, OR
15,278 posts, read 38,299,078 times
Reputation: 16605
You need to talk to your broker. Agency is handled differently across states. Brokerages handle it differently as well. If your broker can't answer this most basic question for you, find a new brokerage to hang your license.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2014, 11:03 AM
 
Location: Needham, MA
8,235 posts, read 12,776,244 times
Reputation: 7611
As others have said, you should talk to your broker about this. Local laws are in play in this situation which only people who practice in VA would be aware of. Also, office policy comes into play as well.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2014, 12:35 PM
 
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
2,141 posts, read 4,842,835 times
Reputation: 3253
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudydog1 View Post
My current listing agreement states no dual agency. So where do I draw the line with the customer.
If you get a call about the house. Disclose to the caller that you represent the seller, that they are entitled to their own representation from any agency but you will not represent them. If they use another agent in your brokerage it will be a Dual Agency situation (agency is with the Broker not agent) anyway so let them proceed on their own. Be honest and fair, nothing more or less.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-02-2014, 08:00 PM
 
401 posts, read 863,035 times
Reputation: 330
Quote:
Originally Posted by AZJoeD View Post
If you get a call about the house. Disclose to the caller that you represent the seller, that they are entitled to their own representation from any agency but you will not represent them. If they use another agent in your brokerage it will be a Dual Agency situation (agency is with the Broker not agent) anyway so let them proceed on their own. Be honest and fair, nothing more or less.
AZJoeD..Amen to your comments. Coming from the comfort of many years of banking where things are very black and white I sometimes feel like I am walking on thin ice as an agent. Especially after attending post licensing courses where you learn about all the things that will get you into trouble.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-08-2014, 11:10 PM
 
936 posts, read 2,117,380 times
Reputation: 938
Our state had to change the brokerage laws when it first adopted dual agency. It used to be that the broker 'owned' all the listings. They changed is so that there was a designated agent in the office who exclusively 'owned' that listing so that other agents in the same office could receive referrals like in your example. The managing broker has a responsibility to secure the files in the office so as to prevent the disclosure of any confidential data.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2014, 09:01 AM
 
Location: Louisville KY Metro area
4,826 posts, read 13,830,961 times
Reputation: 2147
In Kentucky, "Dual Agency" is alive and very well, and I approve. In Kentucky, the entire brokerage, no matter how large is "dual" when the listing agent and/or another agent in the firm are under the same broker.

The simple principle that I instruct our agents to understand is that a "Dual Agent" can do "NO HARM" to either the buyer or seller. Yes, there is a fine line.

Prior to all this agency crap, and that is what I feel it is, the very definition of brokerage meant that we "bring buyers and sellers" together. We were and still should be negotiators. I believe that whether in the same brokerage, the same agent or same-same (sic). We should be representing the unborn child, the completed contract. This is controversial, I know, but it works.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-09-2014, 10:35 AM
 
401 posts, read 863,035 times
Reputation: 330
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomocox View Post
In Kentucky, "Dual Agency" is alive and very well, and I approve. In Kentucky, the entire brokerage, no matter how large is "dual" when the listing agent and/or another agent in the firm are under the same broker.

The simple principle that I instruct our agents to understand is that a "Dual Agent" can do "NO HARM" to either the buyer or seller. Yes, there is a fine line.

Prior to all this agency crap, and that is what I feel it is, the very definition of brokerage meant that we "bring buyers and sellers" together. We were and still should be negotiators. I believe that whether in the same brokerage, the same agent or same-same (sic). We should be representing the unborn child, the completed contract. This is controversial, I know, but it works.
tomocox.."Dual Agent" can do "NO HARM" to either party says it all! I think for myself personally until I obtain more experience I will stick to representing one side or the other. Another senior agent in our office stated that she would pay me a referral fee if I gave leads to her. To my knowledge the broker has not appointed any designated agents accept for himself. Our office is very small. Thank you for the information..
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Real Estate Professionals
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top