Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Real Estate Professionals
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-29-2007, 09:39 PM
 
Location: Nashville, TN
1,177 posts, read 4,155,258 times
Reputation: 945

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric Young View Post
It's obvious - you need to get rid of your uncle.
Sounds like the uncle has gotten rid of him.......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-30-2007, 05:23 AM
 
Location: Palm Coast, Fl
2,249 posts, read 8,894,758 times
Reputation: 1009
Eh, it depends. It really does. Here the procuring cause issue would go before the board if another Realtor is involved. It doesn't generally involve the buyer or the seller except via a statement if either wants to give one, usually written. They can be asked by the Realtor to come and 'testify' but generally that doesn't happen. And you can't talk about what happens in the hearing or the realtors can be sanctioned. The buyer/seller can of course but generally, IMO, they've already moved on, their living their lives and already know they screwed someone or they were ignorant as to how it works and have learned something so they don't bother. The case doesn't happen until after closing and since there is a process, it's generally 2 months or more before an actual hearing unless you go for arbitration and settle it. Since it's handled by board members they aren't bound by the same things a court would be bound by. And generally the one with the most paperwork and records wins the case.
In the OP case, since another Realtor wouldn't be involved, the buyer and seller would be working directly with one another, the Realtor could sue. Would he win? I don't know. And like I said, unless it's a high end house it would probably cost more time and money than it's worth and wouldn't happen.
As for your case? It would be up to my broker what should be done but she wouldn't be happy with a 25% referral fee, I'll tell ya that, lol.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2007, 08:30 AM
 
Location: Cape Cod
1,038 posts, read 3,995,488 times
Reputation: 440
The listing agreement should cover this. If a Buyer saw the house when the listing agreement was in effect and returns within a certain period of time after it's termination, the LA is entitled to his/her commission. The Buyer "appeared" while that contract was was active. I think the Buyer Agent has more of a problem unless there was a Buyer Agency Agreement in effect at the time. If not, the BA is up the creek without a paddle if Uncle Bob doesn't want to play nice. I sense a family feud in the works. Next Thanksgiving/Christmas should be interesting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-30-2007, 06:14 PM
 
Location: Columbia, SC
10,966 posts, read 21,972,507 times
Reputation: 10659
I don't think it matters if Uncle Bob saw the home while it was listed. The listing agent would be owed a commission by the seller. Now, if the OP wants to be paid he'd better have a buyer agency or whatever his state requires. Of course, I think since it's same company it should be ok.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2008, 04:35 PM
 
Location: St. Augustine FL
1,641 posts, read 5,023,466 times
Reputation: 2391
Default Update

Thanks to all of you who posted. I wanted to give you all an update. I am a transaction broker in Florida. The listing agreement does have a clause that states for 12 months following expiration of listing, if home is sold to someone who saw the house while listing is active - full commission is due to the listing agency, (unless the house is relisted with another agency, in which case no commission of due). Now in practice, some agents in my office said good luck with that - actually going after a commission if the sellers sold it to my uncle, and do you really want the bad press and all.
The upshot is, my broker advised me that I should call the listing agent and discuss with him; however, the listing agent called me today to inform me that he is, in fact relisting the property. And my uncle, well, he still hasn't decided whether or not to make an offer.
Sheesh. Relatives.
Again thanks to all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-04-2008, 05:11 PM
 
Location: Martinsville, NJ
6,175 posts, read 12,933,690 times
Reputation: 4020
Quote:
Originally Posted by capecodcathy View Post
The listing agreement should cover this. If a Buyer saw the house when the listing agreement was in effect and returns within a certain period of time after it's termination, the LA is entitled to his/her commission. The Buyer "appeared" while that contract was was active. I think the Buyer Agent has more of a problem unless there was a Buyer Agency Agreement in effect at the time. If not, the BA is up the creek without a paddle if Uncle Bob doesn't want to play nice. I sense a family feud in the works. Next Thanksgiving/Christmas should be interesting.
Actually, it's the listing BROKER that's entitled a commission. That BROKER can then decide whether & how much to pay each of the agents involved. Mr. Seller, do you want to sellthis house?
Mr. Buyer, do you want to buy this house?
Let's sit down & put the details together, shall we?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-05-2008, 05:08 PM
 
Location: Palm Coast, Fl
2,249 posts, read 8,894,758 times
Reputation: 1009
Thank you for the update! It's wonderful when we get the final outcome.
Wow...12 months? You guys write it up for 12 months? I do 120 days.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Real Estate Professionals
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top