Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Real Estate Professionals
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-30-2016, 08:24 PM
 
Location: Northeast Ohio
96 posts, read 105,296 times
Reputation: 84

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by dblackga View Post
1. If the client can do all cash, I strongly recommend that they make that part of the offer. They can still do financing, but they need to understand that they are on the hook for cash if the financing falls through.
2. Escalation clauses are difficult - no one trusts them.
3. Never had a letter that actually worked. Sellers seem to be focused on the bottom line, but hey, it's worth a shot.
4. Minimal deadlines -- quick inspection, quickest appraisal possible.
5. Flexibility on closing date, free temporary occupancy.
6. Include a stip that after the contract goes binding, the listing agent must submit a copy of competing offers within 48 hours. Keeps everyone honest, but you get some pushback, especially if one of the competing offers becomes a back-up offer.
7. Go over your comps with a fine-tooth comb. All that MO back-and-forth, and the winner may end up getting the home for less, anyway, if the appraisal comes in below sales price. (If a listing agent suspects that might be a problem, it might be time for a special stip that nullifies the ability to go back after an appraisal and ask for a lower price. While that might not fly with many purchases, if it is a highly desirable home, it might be worth a shot.)

Honestly, I almost prefer being the backup on a multiple-offer situation. The first buyer is usually ticked off that they were sucked into a MO situation, and gets demanding after inspection -- the seller is more likely to walk if they have a back-up and the buyer starts making demands.
Funny you say that last part. I just finished representing a buyer in a multiple offer situation. We offered full asking price, inspection contingency, conventional loan, and financing contingency.The seller went with the other offer. I spoke to my client today after giving her the night to cool off/collect her thoughts. I explained to her the benefits of submitting a backup offer and she said "Thanks, but I'll pass. I thought about it and I don't think I want to pay what I offered anyways. Lets keep looking."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-31-2016, 09:31 AM
 
Location: MID ATLANTIC
8,674 posts, read 22,908,228 times
Reputation: 10512
Quote:
Originally Posted by SanRemo View Post
I have done that for a buyer a couple of times. We will offer you xxx because we don't want a bidding war.
It's smart, it says we want the home, willing to bid like we want it, but we are not playing games.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Real Estate Professionals

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top