Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Real Estate Professionals
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 07-11-2008, 10:34 PM
 
5 posts, read 15,870 times
Reputation: 11

Advertisements

I sold a property to the tenent after the 9 month listing contract expired. But the agent said I still need pay him because he found the tenant for me. Is it right?

Btw I never talk to the tenant about the selling during listing period
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-12-2008, 04:16 AM
 
Location: Hernando County, FL
8,489 posts, read 20,632,846 times
Reputation: 5397
Need a little more info.

Was the home listed to sell and the list agent brought the tenant in during that time?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2008, 05:17 AM
 
69,368 posts, read 64,081,664 times
Reputation: 9383
Quote:
Originally Posted by hjlk View Post
I sold a property to the tenent after the 9 month listing contract expired. But the agent said I still need pay him because he found the tenant for me. Is it right?

Btw I never talk to the tenant about the selling during listing period
Depends, did the agent bring the tenant in with the intent to rent the property, or buy it? If the intent was to rent then the agent is not entitled to a commissioin, but would have been entitled to a fee for finding you a tenant, (1 month rent standard for residentials, a commission % if commerical) if the agent brought the tenant to you because they were looking to purchase, but they decided on renting first, then yes, the agent would be entitled to his commission.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2008, 05:59 AM
 
Location: Palm Coast, Fl
2,249 posts, read 8,894,758 times
Reputation: 1009
Why'd you post this twice? My reply is in the other thread you started.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2008, 10:08 AM
 
5 posts, read 15,870 times
Reputation: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Peterson View Post
Was the home listed to sell and the list agent brought the tenant in during that time?
Yes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2008, 10:17 AM
 
5 posts, read 15,870 times
Reputation: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by pghquest View Post
Depends, did the agent bring the tenant in with the intent to rent the property, or buy it? If the intent was to rent then the agent is not entitled to a commissioin, but would have been entitled to a fee for finding you a tenant, (1 month rent standard for residentials, a commission % if commerical) if the agent brought the tenant to you because they were looking to purchase, but they decided on renting first, then yes, the agent would be entitled to his commission.
The intent was only to rent and the tenant never show interest to buy during listing period. The agent didn't charge a fee for finding a tenant because I bought that property through him 2 years ago.

There's no specified clause for this kind situation in the listing agreement and lease agreement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2008, 10:31 AM
 
5 posts, read 15,870 times
Reputation: 11
Quote:
Originally Posted by palmcoasting View Post
Why'd you post this twice? My reply is in the other thread you started.
Sorry for posting twice. Thanks for your reply
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2008, 12:28 PM
 
Location: Palm Coast, Fl
2,249 posts, read 8,894,758 times
Reputation: 1009
Quote:
There's no specified clause for this kind situation in the listing agreement and lease agreement
Was the "protection period" for the agent over? Look at your listing agreement...there will be a period of time that the agent is covered for if they've brought a prospect to the home. Now. If that was over, you're definately in the clear.
If that wasn't over it could get a little sticky because the agent will probably say he/she spoke to them about purchasing the house and the two of you played a little game to not have to pay the commission. He would have to sue you for it if you don't just pay him. BUT. If he doesn't have something in writing stating you agreed to pay a commission on this tenant, he might have a hard time. You should check with an attorney.
Our listing agreements state if the tenant purchases a commission is owed. I don't know why people don't make sure terms are clear when they take/give a listing but it happens all the time. Our leases also have something in it that if the tenant ends up purchasing the home a commission is due.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2008, 03:43 PM
 
Location: Houston-ish, TX
1,099 posts, read 3,735,081 times
Reputation: 399
Sounds almost like this should be filed under Karma. The agent brought you the person who bought the home. You may not be legally obligated to pay the agent but it somehow seems like the right thing to do.Try to put yourself in the agent's shoes, wouldn't you feel like you just got _____ed? (Fill in the blank with your own choice words)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2008, 04:18 PM
 
Location: Salem, OR
15,572 posts, read 40,409,288 times
Reputation: 17473
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikiJayne View Post
Sounds almost like this should be filed under Karma. The agent brought you the person who bought the home. You may not be legally obligated to pay the agent but it somehow seems like the right thing to do.Try to put yourself in the agent's shoes, wouldn't you feel like you just got _____ed? (Fill in the blank with your own choice words)
I agree. The agent helped you get a tenant and did not charge you for that service thinking they were going to get paid when the house sold. This was a nice thing to do. While, you might not legally have to pay them anything, I think the ethical choice is clear.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate > Real Estate Professionals
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top