Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Wow...just wow. As far as experience...well I've closed more homes the last 5 months than you have in the last 30 years so I have a little experience too. I maintain the Realtor is more experienced in handling negotiations, has better knowledge of market conditions, can better determine the condition and value of a house compared to other homes for sale, knows better inspectors, is better able to negotiate repair addendum's and the supplemental work in a closing, and understands the contract and liabilities better than ANY unlicensed legal assistant.
Oh by the way, the realtor works for the client the same as the attorney so throw that argument out. As for the rest, I suppose readers will just have to judge whether to rely on an unlicensed legal assistant/attorney or a Realtor.
I do wish that people did a better job of hiring good agents. That would make a huge difference because many assume all agents are the exact same when in reality there is a huge difference between a great agent and an average agent.
Brandon, I think we'll have to agree to disagree......
A realtor can possess all the desirable skills you listed, but in my experience most do not, and I definitely would not automatically defer to one as "better" in every area. Everything is a matter of degree.
I learned the hard way not to use a realtor recommended inspector. Naturally, someone will recommend an inspector with whom they have developed an easy working relationship. Unfortunately, that may not be in the buyer's best interest. I'd prefer to trust a recommendation from my attorney.
Realtor and attorney relationships are not the same.
The realtor is working on commission, which absolutely can skew their perspective. Salespeople are driven to close the sale. It's in their best interest to do so as quickly as possible. It's what good salespeople do. However, it's not always in the best interest of the buyer, whether its houses, cars, or appliances. It's simply the business of sales.
The attorney works for either a pre-agreed flat fee, or hourly, depending on the complicity of the transaction in question. Usually, home sales are not deeply convoluted. Associated fees are generally standardized within regions. The attorney has no vested interest in pushing for closing without tying up all the loose ends in a contract. It's simply the business of law.
I wish people did a better job of hiring DOCTORS! The point is, it's not always easy to find the top people in most fields, especially so in real estate, because your clients can be from outside the region or state.
This issue is not unique to realtors. It's the same with Dr.s, lawyers, police, inspectors, etc. NO GROUP effectively polices its own. So it's up to the consumer to figure out, often under pressure of time, who is the best. It's hard.
You said you have "30 years" experience. Perhaps we can end this thread with you educating me and other potential RE buyers exactly HOW to find the best realtor.
...Realtor and attorney relationships are not the same. ...
Actually, they are if you have an agency relationship with the Realtor. Both the Realtor and lawyer have fiduciary duties to their clients.
Realtors can also work for a flat fee paid by their client (buyer or seller). And conversely, lawyers can work on a contingency basis.
You may have found an exceptional legal assistant that can work as effectively or better than many Realtors. I would not say that is the norm or recommend that everyone do the same.
Brandon, I think we'll have to agree to disagree......
A realtor can possess all the desirable skills you listed, but in my experience most do not, and I definitely would not automatically defer to one as "better" in every area. Everything is a matter of degree.
I learned the hard way not to use a realtor recommended inspector. Naturally, someone will recommend an inspector with whom they have developed an easy working relationship. Unfortunately, that may not be in the buyer's best interest. I'd prefer to trust a recommendation from my attorney.
Realtor and attorney relationships are not the same.
The realtor is working on commission, which absolutely can skew their perspective. Salespeople are driven to close the sale. It's in their best interest to do so as quickly as possible. It's what good salespeople do. However, it's not always in the best interest of the buyer, whether its houses, cars, or appliances. It's simply the business of sales.
The attorney works for either a pre-agreed flat fee, or hourly, depending on the complicity of the transaction in question. Usually, home sales are not deeply convoluted. Associated fees are generally standardized within regions. The attorney has no vested interest in pushing for closing without tying up all the loose ends in a contract. It's simply the business of law.
I wish people did a better job of hiring DOCTORS! The point is, it's not always easy to find the top people in most fields, especially so in real estate, because your clients can be from outside the region or state.
This issue is not unique to realtors. It's the same with Dr.s, lawyers, police, inspectors, etc. NO GROUP effectively polices its own. So it's up to the consumer to figure out, often under pressure of time, who is the best. It's hard.
You said you have "30 years" experience. Perhaps we can end this thread with you educating me and other potential RE buyers exactly HOW to find the best realtor.
The biggest issue good realtors face is how many bad ones there are out there... Unfortunately it does not simply come down to experience and # of closings - if that was the extent of judging a realtor it would be much easier. Even then, just like any salesperson, realtors have a tendency to self promote through exaggeration... I can't tell you how many "I'm one of the top agents in my office" I've met through the years. It's just not physically possible for them all to be "the best" and, like I said, sheer volume is NOT the end all / be all judge of a realtor.
All too often a realtor does not bring the value 5+% commission dictates. It's rather upsetting to knowledgeable buyers and sellers.
Realtor and attorney relationships are not the same.
They are if you have an agency agreement. I'm sorry you don't understand an agents duty to a client but I can assure you it IS the same as an attorney. I realize some agents are better at it than others, but the same can be said for any profession, including attorneys. Do you also dispute the rest of my post that an agent can better advise a client regarding real estate than a legal assistant?
Then you are misinformed. Two brokerages, two agents, lots of liability...sometimes I am worth all 6 by myself, other times more than 10%
haha - how could I be misinformed about personal experience?!
Keep in mind this isn't a personal attack on you or your profession... It's a fact of life that EVERY profession has people who just aren't very good at what they do - yet, they think they are!
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.