Quote:
Originally Posted by thndrcloud
We're trying to get all the ducks in a row for our close on June 30 and since we live in a HOA we have to get a 22.1 Disclosure letter from them and then the buyer has a questionnaire that they want filled out. Normally the buyer would get those from the HOA themselves but I agreed to get them when they asked in an addendum because I didn't realize I'd have to pay for them. My fault, I ordered them and will get them to the buyer.
Now my attorney's office is telling me I have to pay another $125 to get a Paid Assessment Letter. This is getting ridiculous. I can go online, log into my account and print out our entire account history for the last three or four years that will show that we're current. According to their FAQ we're paying for the liability the letter carries as well as processing fees.
Is the letter really necessary? Not to mention that in the questionnaire we're paying to have filled out there is a question asking if there are any liens, unpaid assessments, special assessments or other charges against the property that haven't been paid. Won't that cover it?
I did reply to the secretary asking these questions but her responses usually don't contain good explanations.
|
thndrcloud - understand that the statutes in Illinois and many other states were authored by the trade-lobby group representing HOA/COA management companies and attorneys. Your involuntary membership in the HOA/COA is the tool these groups use to extract money from you.
it is important to distinguish between an HOA and a condominium association (COA). They are both forms of involuntary associations that burden real estate, but condominium ownership is primarily a statutory form of ownership and is governed by statutes specific to condominiums.
I couldn't help but notice middle-aged mom's comment: "As such, the law governs the disclosure and it customary for many association to charge the owner/seller for the service.
After all, why should other owners pay for the time and potential liability of your disclosure" (
emphasis added)
That last statement is a complete fallacy.
The disclosure is a disclosure by the condo association itself and about its records on your property. The managing agent is already supposed to be maintaining these records and you are supposed to have access to them. The idea that there is any additional "cost" being borne by the other members is a red herring. As to liability, well try to identify the liability that the COA has if it misrepresents numbers or fails to include all the requisite documents.
The COA is not usually the recipient of the fees. To the contrary, the managing agent is the party that creates and gets these "costs". The statute is a fee generation statute for the benefit of management companies. Many of these management companies are also trying to impose additional fees by demanding that the homeowner obtain a "certificate of compliance" or some other such nonsense before they will release the document you referred to. You might also find a management company trying to demand that you pay for an "inspection fee" and submit your property to their inspection as well - all off the books of the COA.
What the management companies have done is to get the COA (via a management agreement) to allow the management company to run up any fees it chooses at your expense off the books of the COA. These are not "costs" the COA incurred or would have ever agreed incur.
The managing agents also know that they can extract more money from the owner by jeopardizing a sale. This is accomplished, for example, by waiting until a few days before closing to claim that monies are owed or that some situation of noncompliance exists. Threatened with the face of loss of the sale, homeowners typically pay the extortionists.
Regarding the potential liability, the condo association
should be held accountable for making false representations in
its disclosures - and the association corp should be held liable to both the seller and buyer as appropriate. However, you will find that the statutes and managing agreements are designed to protect the vendors of the COA - not you and not the COA.
Care to indicate the name of the managing agent of the COA?