We are in a unique situation. We are one of those couples that don't have a ton of ready cash, but do have substantial incomes and phenomenal credit.
(We just got engaged and married within the last year... it was a short engagement, we paid for the whole thing ourselves... been dating for years, so it wasn't a shotgun situation
)
Anyway, we are fortunate in that our credit union will do a 100% mortgage (even on a jumbo)... they require substantially more for closing costs (including a 1.75% funding fee).
Our lender will allow up to 4% in seller concessions, though.
I own a townhouse that I bought while we were dating, but before we moved in together. With the housing market being so iffy, we decided that it was best to rent it out (it's in a great location, and my mortgage is small). I cannot get my equity out of it right now if I wanted to sell it. We can keep staying here for awhile, but truly? We need more room. I have 3 kids from a previous marriage, and my husband and I both work from home fairly often (need office space at home).
I was thinking that builders and people who have been in their houses for a long time might be more likely than someone who has been in a house for a couple 2 or 3 years (this is a generalization, of course) to be able to come up with 4% seller concessions.
What are your thoughts?
Naturally, with individual sellers, we had planned paying 4% more for a house (once we negotiated a fair price) to get the 4% concessions for closing. This isn't about trying to take some pour soul for a ride if we find a good house.
With builders, I figure whatever they feel comfortable doing, I'm not going to bend over backward trying to pay them extra money. They're businesspeople, not the people who lived in the home.
Your thoughts?