Quote:
Originally Posted by manderly6
How about the agents on this board? How many of you would continue to refer people if you weren't getting a referral?
|
It is a service business. I would.
Well, more accurately:
Yes. Sometimes. No. Sometimes not. Maybe. It depends.
I worked with a lady. Lots of hours.
She decided she wanted a home an in-office colleague had listed.
I don't really care for dual agency, and thought it best to refer her outside the office so she would have full representation.
I sent her to a friend, and got a referral fee.
I'm OK with that.
A couple called me. I showed them a few homes and hooked them up with a lender who worked for months to help them build credit.
And they started looking at homes a little further away than I cared to go.
I referred them to a colleague, and collected a referral fee.
I'm OK with that too.
A woman consulted with me for months prior to relocation. I did a lot of legwork and had some stuff lined up.
And, at the last minute there was a snag and her husband took a job in another city 90 miles away.
She was in a panic, since they were moving out of their home.
I asked, "I know some folks over there. Would you like me to connect you with a great agent?" I made a couple of phone calls, and she had a great agent call her back in about 3 hours.
I collected a referral fee.
She was effusively grateful, as was the agent.
I'm OK with all that.
I think I delivered value in all those examples. Which of those referral fees should be illegal?
The real issue stems from lack of transparency and the common shell game with the money.
If buyers just coughed up cash for services, then it would not be necessary for them to reimburse the referring agent with money they pass to the seller to hand to the listing agent and back to the buyers agent and then a piece to the referring agent, just so the buyer can finance it in the deal and call it "Free."