Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-16-2014, 11:09 AM
 
Location: Massachusetts
6,301 posts, read 9,595,740 times
Reputation: 4797

Advertisements

There is a property in my area that was listed with a real estate agency, but never was on on MLS. Just curious what that's all about.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-16-2014, 11:12 AM
 
Location: Martinsville, NJ
6,175 posts, read 12,899,182 times
Reputation: 4019
Quote:
Originally Posted by 495neighbor View Post
There is a property in my area that was listed with a real estate agency, but never was on on MLS. Just curious what that's all about.
There is no law that says all listed properties must be put on an MLS. Though I happen to believe that the MLS is a very important marketing tool, there are some brokers, agents, and home sellers who prefer not to use it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2014, 11:17 AM
 
Location: Raleigh, NC
19,374 posts, read 27,620,236 times
Reputation: 35978
Did it go under contract very quickly, perhaps before the agent got it listed on the MLS?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2014, 04:41 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts
6,301 posts, read 9,595,740 times
Reputation: 4797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jkgourmet View Post
Did it go under contract very quickly, perhaps before the agent got it listed on the MLS?
King of makes sense.

Just thought it was unusual given that there was another very similar property listed at the same price by the same agency that was also under agreement quickly but did show up on mls for the few weeks it was listed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2014, 05:08 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,919 posts, read 46,491,381 times
Reputation: 20674
It's called a pocket listing. In my area the seller would have to specifically instruct his agent in writing not to list it in the MLS.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2014, 05:29 PM
 
51,588 posts, read 25,547,985 times
Reputation: 37775
Why would sellers instruct the agent not to list on MLS? What would be the advantage to a pocket listing to a seller?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2014, 05:31 PM
 
Location: Up above the world so high!
45,218 posts, read 100,375,235 times
Reputation: 40197
Quote:
Originally Posted by GotHereQuickAsICould View Post
Why would sellers instruct the agent not to list on MLS? What would be the advantage to a pocket listing to a seller?
Some sellers really value their privacy. They do not want just anybody having access to their home. They want their agent and their agent ONLY to show the home. If a property is in MLS it's wide open to the world
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2014, 05:31 PM
 
Location: Georgia
4,578 posts, read 5,628,491 times
Reputation: 15968
Some MLS's are stricter than others. Around here, if you are a member of the MLS, you are required to post all listings within 48 hours of the date of the listing agreement, and get fined if you don't. Even if it's your listing and you sell it before you can even get the photos taken, you still have to post it on MLS -- in case the contract falls through (which happens, alas), and also to provide a statistical figure that the MLS uses to analyze sales trends. Other MLS's figure that if you don't bother putting it on MLS, you are only hurting yourself and your seller, and don't care. Maybe the local MLS is somewhere between those two extremes.

Some agents try to skate it here, because out MLS that requires all this also charges $120 per $100,000 of sale price to BOTH agents -- so if a $200,000 house sells, and both agents are members of the MLS, then BOTH agent are paying $240 to the MLS. Seems a shame to give the MLS a chunck of that change if the MLS wasn't responsible in any way for it being sold. but rules are rules.

The agent may be from a nearby area but isn't a member of the local MLS -- doesn't mean that they can't sell property there,they just don't have access to the MLS. They may have posted it in their own MLS, so it may show up on Zillow/Trulia/Realtor.com that way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2014, 06:03 PM
 
Location: Mokelumne Hill, CA & El Pescadero, BCS MX.
6,957 posts, read 22,238,528 times
Reputation: 6469
Our state form has a checkbox for the seller to exclude the listing from the MLS. Some do, most don't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-16-2014, 06:11 PM
 
Location: Massachusetts
6,301 posts, read 9,595,740 times
Reputation: 4797
Quote:
Originally Posted by dblackga View Post
Some MLS's are stricter than others. Around here, if you are a member of the MLS, you are required to post all listings within 48 hours of the date of the listing agreement, and get fined if you don't. Even if it's your listing and you sell it before you can even get the photos taken, you still have to post it on MLS -- in case the contract falls through (which happens, alas), and also to provide a statistical figure that the MLS uses to analyze sales trends. Other MLS's figure that if you don't bother putting it on MLS, you are only hurting yourself and your seller, and don't care. Maybe the local MLS is somewhere between those two extremes.

Some agents try to skate it here, because out MLS that requires all this also charges $120 per $100,000 of sale price to BOTH agents -- so if a $200,000 house sells, and both agents are members of the MLS, then BOTH agent are paying $240 to the MLS. Seems a shame to give the MLS a chunck of that change if the MLS wasn't responsible in any way for it being sold. but rules are rules.

The agent may be from a nearby area but isn't a member of the local MLS -- doesn't mean that they can't sell property there,they just don't have access to the MLS. They may have posted it in their own MLS, so it may show up on Zillow/Trulia/Realtor.com that way.
Massachusetts, I am certain requires 24 hour deadline from listing agreement signing.

Agency, in this situation, is definitely a member of MLS. They have dozens of listings on there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top