Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-09-2016, 08:58 AM
 
26 posts, read 31,021 times
Reputation: 15

Advertisements

My husband and I found a house on a couple of acres we like. I checked out the county website, and noticed listed in the legal property description: Cargill has mineral rights.

Could someone help me understand what implications this would have and what considerations one should take? Would this be a deal breaker for you? We are in New York State.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-09-2016, 09:29 AM
 
Location: On the Chesapeake
45,425 posts, read 60,608,674 times
Reputation: 61041
I'm not familiar with NY law but generally having mineral rights allows the holder to enter the property for evaluation and exploitation.


An example would be if coal was to be mined. The holder could extract that coal. In PA, the landowner would get a per ton royalty for that and the mining company would have to restore the contours of the property when finished.


A company could drill a gas well and again the property owner would get a royalty payment (or free gas supplied to the house, I've seen that).


My family holds the coal rights on the old family farm although someone else now owns the property and it has been stripped a couple times. There is still one more vein remaining which may or may not be taken out at some point in the future.


My grandfather gave the natural gas rights to a neighbor (whose grandchildren now hold them) and a well was sunk in the property a few years ago. The owner complained but had no recourse. The same as about 35 years ago when the coal was last taken out.


As far as keeping me from buying a property I don't know what my response would be.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2016, 09:29 AM
 
15,802 posts, read 20,519,731 times
Reputation: 20974
Quote:
Originally Posted by addtcd View Post
Could someone help me understand what implications this would have

Just a quick google search.



The five elements of a mineral right are:
  1. The right to use as much of the surface as is reasonably necessary to access the minerals
  2. The right to further convey rights
  3. The right to receive bonus consideration
  4. The right to receive delay
  5. The right to receive royalties


You'd really need to have your realtor touch base and find out the implications of the situation. We can't tell you what sort of deal has been setup on that property. You'll have to do the legwork.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2016, 09:36 AM
 
Location: southwest TN
8,568 posts, read 18,114,585 times
Reputation: 16707
You need to contact an attorney for a full explanation, although the ones above are correct.

Would I purchase a property with deeded out mineral rights? Not unless it was hundreds of acres where mining/drilling wouldn't affect my home. Then again, maybe even the hundreds of acres wouldn't be enough. I would hate to have the land strip-mined or an oil well that I could see/hear/smell chugging away.

Perhaps you could purchase the mineral rights from the current owner.

I notice there are 5 threads concerning mineral rights on this forum: Nevada, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Dallas, and Tulsa. You might find more info there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2016, 09:50 AM
 
26 posts, read 31,021 times
Reputation: 15
We are just starting to peek at what's out there again after a recent attempt to purchase fell through two days before closing (no realtor yet). Before posting, I had a hard time narrowing the search results here on CD to find what I was looking for (although now that I've posted, I clearly see the "similar threads" below. When I searched "mineral rights" in this forum, I didn't see those results. I'll keep looking!) I hadn't thought about the possibility of buying the rights, appreciate that input.

Thanks all for responding
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2016, 10:07 AM
 
Location: Lead/Deadwood, SD
948 posts, read 2,792,743 times
Reputation: 872
Its also wise to research how the mineral rights holder historically has handled surface owners in the past. Compensation varies a lot, and really what should dictate your choice should be primarily how your state, and the mineral owner tends to such advancements of exploration or exploitation. Some try to buyout landowner rights to minimize resistance, some pay handsomely to do so while others will try to squeeze landowners out. Tough to have a crystal ball in the matter. Good luck!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2016, 10:17 AM
 
8,575 posts, read 12,417,745 times
Reputation: 16533
You should first determine what rights the company actually holds. Their rights in the property could run with the land--or they could be for a set number of years. Most of the mineral rights in Michigan are permanently conveyed, but I've run across instances where they were leased for a set term.

You would also need to determine the scope of their interest in the property. Most of the "mineral rights" in Michigan pertain to oil and gas. It may be similar in your area, but if it entails rights to coal--or other subsurface "minerals" which would require extensive surface disturbance to access, that may be even more of a concern.

If the rights are limited to oil and gas, that does not mean that they would plop down a well on your property to access the oil or gas. With only 2 acres, they would most likely be required to pool their holdings with other properties in the area, since you can't pump from a 2-acre plot and only pull out the oil and gas which is underneath the property. So, even though they hold the right, they may choose to locate any well at a distance quite removed from your property. Or...they might stick in right in your back yard.

Of course, many "rights" are not exercised. There may not be enough of a market for the substances involved, or there may not be sufficient quantities to make it economically viable to proceed with extraction. Lots of questions here, but you should have fun trying to look up all of the answers. Start with the recorded instrument conveying the mineral rights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2016, 12:04 PM
 
5,046 posts, read 9,626,106 times
Reputation: 4181
In the interest of time, rather than writing back and forth about clarification on the location, there are lots of salt mines in that area. So let me say the following. (PS you should really write a book about your house hunting adventures)

If it's one Finger Lake, Cayuga, I don't know that they'd give up the salt mines. They are probably already in use under the house you're looking at. If it's Cayuga, they started on this in 1915 and are not giving up yet. Click on the little red map and it will enlarge greatly. The salt mines are vast and deep and a serious operation there:


http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html...fa5867459effad


They have been working on this a long time. There are elevators that go 1/2 mile down and then workers commute underground about 40 minutes to work sites. Plants, conveyors, lunchrooms. The salt is used locally and even down south to NC.

Ancient Seas, Modern Ownership Concerns - FracTracker Alliance

If it's another Finger Lake, Seneca, US Salt sold to a corporation for the sole purpose of storing derivatives from fracked gas (propane and butane). The company plants to spend $40-$50 million to develop liquefied petroleum gas storage in caverns by this other lake that have been capped for more than 50 years. This is being fought by those concerned with safety risks and the environment, as you can imagine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2016, 01:46 PM
 
Location: Las Vegas
14,229 posts, read 30,044,201 times
Reputation: 27689
I own some mineral rights. I guess the first thing I would want to know is what's there. Oil? Gas? Coal? Minerals? If the property you are considering is under lease, chanced are the neighbor's land is too. I would meet the neighbors and ask about it. And I would drive around and look for signs of mining/exploration in the area. Ask your realtor to check it out too. You can also go to the county and take a look at the lease. And find out who owns the rights.

Most likely this means exactly nothing. Companies buy up leases and do nothing with them all the time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-09-2016, 04:10 PM
 
Location: Somewhere in America
15,479 posts, read 15,632,418 times
Reputation: 28464
Quote:
Originally Posted by cully View Post
In the interest of time, rather than writing back and forth about clarification on the location, there are lots of salt mines in that area. So let me say the following. (PS you should really write a book about your house hunting adventures)

If it's one Finger Lake, Cayuga, I don't know that they'd give up the salt mines. They are probably already in use under the house you're looking at. If it's Cayuga, they started on this in 1915 and are not giving up yet. Click on the little red map and it will enlarge greatly. The salt mines are vast and deep and a serious operation there:


http://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html...fa5867459effad


They have been working on this a long time. There are elevators that go 1/2 mile down and then workers commute underground about 40 minutes to work sites. Plants, conveyors, lunchrooms. The salt is used locally and even down south to NC.

Ancient Seas, Modern Ownership Concerns - FracTracker Alliance

If it's another Finger Lake, Seneca, US Salt sold to a corporation for the sole purpose of storing derivatives from fracked gas (propane and butane). The company plants to spend $40-$50 million to develop liquefied petroleum gas storage in caverns by this other lake that have been capped for more than 50 years. This is being fought by those concerned with safety risks and the environment, as you can imagine.
They still own their rights on Cayuga Lake. Salt mines are not leaving the Finger Lakes. Seneca Lake has a salt mine that has been reopened. Another mine is being used as a storage facility for gas.

Before signing anything in the region, you must find out if there are any rights that have been conveyed. There are people who signed over various rights over the years. All do not mean the same thing. At this time, fracking has been banned in NYS, but that doesn't mean in the future it will be. Many have sold the gas rights as well.....it's not always called gas rights either. Definitely something you need an attorney for....one who is experienced with these types of rights - not all real estate attorneys are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:41 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top