Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-14-2016, 05:35 PM
 
Location: Lake Norman, NC
8,876 posts, read 13,907,158 times
Reputation: 35986

Advertisements

The house in post #1 is OK. There's really nothing noteworthy about it.

The house in post #7 is not appealing at all.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-14-2016, 05:50 PM
 
2,334 posts, read 2,646,091 times
Reputation: 3933
I think they're both very dull; the first one looks cheaply ostentatious. It's just too much. The other one looks like a large car park for a department store.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2016, 06:04 PM
 
Location: Riverside Ca
22,146 posts, read 33,503,954 times
Reputation: 35437
I think most of these old houses need to be torn down. Not only are most of them ugly as hell, they are inefficient and interiors are really lacking in use of space. Let's not get into interior design. Some old houses have closets that are basically a giant wardrobe that was bolted to the wall protruding into the living space. It takes up a ton of room making a small room even smaller. Let's not talk about old inefficient air ducts, single pane Windows, old electrical wiring and panels that are fire hazards, not to mention the 50 years termites had to eat the place apart.
No matter what upgrades you do internally you will not get more sq footage.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2016, 06:19 PM
 
Location: OH>IL>CO>CT
7,514 posts, read 13,608,655 times
Reputation: 11908
Quote:
Originally Posted by FairMindedLL View Post
That's a very common design for my area of So Cal. Even many of the older homes here (30+ years) have garages directly in front or within sight of the front door. Flat roofs aren't really an issue since we don't get any snow or even that much rain, so the design works for this region, although I prefer a sloped roof myself. I like the overall design compared to the older tract homes around here that have even less character and look like they're hopeless stuck in the 1970s. To have a truly unique home, one would have to do a custom build, but the permits are impossible to get around here unless you have north of $1M to spend on a home and the time and patience to deal with the city.
Just wait, in 40 years this home will be "dated".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2016, 06:49 PM
 
1,153 posts, read 1,049,061 times
Reputation: 4358
That would look great in Arizona or Southern California, but would look incredibly silly in my area.

For much of last year my company worked on a California style "modern" house that was just completely out of place for the area. Square, "blocky" houses and anything stucco is just absurd in this area (and in this climate).

The house itself would've been beautiful and interesting....in Nevada....but not along the South River (Annapolis) just before flowing into the Chesapeake bay.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2016, 06:50 PM
 
4,567 posts, read 10,650,140 times
Reputation: 6730
Quote:
Originally Posted by oh come on! View Post
and what do the neighbors think? The older people in this town are pretty vocal with their hate. .
I believe people can build whatever they want. They own it. I dont really care what they build. America would be boring if every house was the same.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2016, 06:57 PM
 
1,399 posts, read 1,798,197 times
Reputation: 3256
Not for me. Overdone!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2016, 07:03 PM
 
Location: Denver, CO
2,325 posts, read 5,507,013 times
Reputation: 2596
Quote:
Originally Posted by davebarnes View Post
At 5250 sqft, I think it certainly qualifies as huge.
https://www.redfin.com/CA/Arcadia/21...6/home/7240143
But, hey, it's a bargain at $3.2M

We have the same issue in our neighborhood.
The old timers are happy that the Latino gangs no longer rule, but they hate the new modern houses like mine.
I love the new houses like your's in Denver. That first house at the top of the thread screams "nouveau riche". It reminds me of the houses Persians build in Beverly Hills. Ugly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2016, 07:08 PM
 
Location: here
24,873 posts, read 36,155,231 times
Reputation: 32726
I think it's pretty, but I understand why they wouldn't want historic homes torn down for these.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-14-2016, 07:11 PM
 
Location: London
12,275 posts, read 7,133,491 times
Reputation: 13661
Nice design, but way too damn big unless you're the Duggars.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:42 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top