Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 04-18-2016, 11:32 AM
 
9,891 posts, read 11,761,250 times
Reputation: 22087

Advertisements

Let me tell you a very true story.

Hewlett Packard developed the modern electronic survey equipment. They wanted to check it for accuracy, so they went to the Colorado State Survey Test Site. They tested the equipment against the spots used for testing surveyors, and their measurements did not match what the state had them set at. They went back to Loveland Co, and checked the equipment and went back down and got the same measurements they got the first time. They paid to have it surveyed by a top surveyor who came up with the same as with the HP equipment. They had been right both times, and to pass the test for decades you had to be wrong to pass. Some that had failed their tests and refused their license, were suddenly surveyors. And some other had to be re-tested.

A tremendous number of surveys done the old way say 1970 and before, are not accurate now they have equipment that is accurate.

A lot of old legal descriptions are not worth much, when the surveyors go in and use modern equipment. New legal descriptions often had to be written. I spent from 1972 till I finally retired, as a specialist real estate broker, specializing in working with investors, and real estate exchanges (often with several properties and several states and even some out of the U.S. involved as one of the legs of the exchange. I have seen problems like yours quite often.

What you need to do, is to get the property lines marked as you have. Then make sure your neighbors are in agreement as you don't want them to later say your survey is wrong. Get those problems solved now. Then have the surveyor write a replacement legal description, which is filed with the county.

The reason I know about the HP problem, is some of the guys that developed it were my clients and told me about it,. while it was all going on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-18-2016, 12:19 PM
 
19 posts, read 46,495 times
Reputation: 16
Quote:
The distances will give an indication as to intent, but when conflicting with the controlling calls to adjoiners, you're going to hold the adjoiners.
What do you mean by this exactly?



Quote:
What you need to do, is to get the property lines marked as you have. Then make sure your neighbors are in agreement as you don't want them to later say your survey is wrong
Luckily there are only two neighbors. One on the east side and we are separated by a ditch and they see he survey stakes and hold no issue, even said they were happy someone is finally occupying the land and tending to it. The other "neighbor" is a farmer's rice field and he already has his levy for his field stopping right at the old fence enclosing my propert.



I'm probably going to get a second surveyor to go out and check the previous surveyor's work, but make clear of the situation first and explain to him of the abandoned railroad.

Last edited by QuantumChaos; 04-18-2016 at 12:37 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2016, 01:55 PM
 
Location: Turlock, CA
323 posts, read 376,799 times
Reputation: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuantumChaos View Post
What do you mean by this exactly?

What that means is if you have a distance on a legal description, it is considered to be of less importance than the reference to the property owners to each side.

If I have a line described that states, "North 150 feet to the lands of Bernard", and it turns out Bernard's property is 195 feet away instead of 150, then the line extends to the lands of Bernard and ignores the distance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2016, 02:26 PM
 
19 posts, read 46,495 times
Reputation: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darrett View Post
What that means is if you have a distance on a legal description, it is considered to be of less importance than the reference to the property owners to each side.

If I have a line described that states, "North 150 feet to the lands of Bernard", and it turns out Bernard's property is 195 feet away instead of 150, then the line extends to the lands of Bernard and ignores the distance.

I see. So likely it IS the old railroad that was abandoned causing the issue. Here is the description of my land from a tax bill, and as you can see it mentions "railroad" which hasn't existed since before the 60s. Imgur: The most awesome images on the Internet

Maybe as mentioned, the legal's measurements doesn't take into account the piece of land the railroad no longer goes through? I also find it odd that a lot is only 50 feet wide.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-18-2016, 03:41 PM
 
Location: Turlock, CA
323 posts, read 376,799 times
Reputation: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuantumChaos View Post
I see. So likely it IS the old railroad that was abandoned causing the issue. Here is the description of my land from a tax bill, and as you can see it mentions "railroad" which hasn't existed since before the 60s. Imgur: The most awesome images on the Internet

Maybe as mentioned, the legal's measurements doesn't take into account the piece of land the railroad no longer goes through? I also find it odd that a lot is only 50 feet wide.
It seems likely that's the case here, though I'd have to spend a bit more time going over documents to be sure.

Lots can be all sorts of crazy widths; around here, it wasn't uncommon to have 25 foot lots. It was assumed that you'd buy as many as you needed to build your house on, and in the early part of the century, there wasn't a problem when purchasing 6 lots and building a house over lot lines.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2016, 11:28 AM
 
19 posts, read 46,495 times
Reputation: 16
Went to the court house to do some research and happened to run into a surveyor, he glanced over the papers I had and said "You have your plat right there, a plat map always trumps a legal; always."

Let's hope he is right and this turns out well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2016, 02:08 PM
 
9,891 posts, read 11,761,250 times
Reputation: 22087
Have you looked at the records at the courthouse, to make sure what they have recorded for your property. Your plat should be recorded for the correct description.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2016, 04:53 PM
 
19 posts, read 46,495 times
Reputation: 16
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtrader View Post
Have you looked at the records at the courthouse, to make sure what they have recorded for your property. Your plat should be recorded for the correct description.
There is nothing on it. The last survey that was done was in '72, it was done by the same surveyor who surveyed it for me last year and he can't find the survey from '72.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-19-2016, 10:14 PM
 
8,573 posts, read 12,403,094 times
Reputation: 16527
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuantumChaos View Post
There is nothing on it. The last survey that was done was in '72, it was done by the same surveyor who surveyed it for me last year and he can't find the survey from '72.
If it was platted, the plat should have been recorded. That might give you a better legal description.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-20-2016, 06:59 AM
 
Location: Central Texas
20,958 posts, read 45,395,703 times
Reputation: 24740
Are there field notes with the survey?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:31 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top