Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What do you consider an old house
10 years or less, I want brand new 2 1.89%
25 years 8 7.55%
50 years 29 27.36%
75 years 24 22.64%
100 years 37 34.91%
150 years or more. 6 5.66%
Voters: 106. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-17-2016, 07:39 AM
 
12,016 posts, read 12,744,120 times
Reputation: 13420

Advertisements

answer poll or discuss.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-17-2016, 07:42 AM
 
12,016 posts, read 12,744,120 times
Reputation: 13420
I would say 100 or more is old, Something 75 years or so I would call an older home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2016, 08:11 AM
 
Location: Salem, OR
15,569 posts, read 40,404,923 times
Reputation: 17468
I think your answer will depend on what part of the country you are from. Out here we don't have too many homes 100 years old. Between fires and maintenance of homes due to rain, there just aren't that many left.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2016, 08:12 AM
 
Location: Finally the house is done and we are in Port St. Lucie!
3,488 posts, read 3,334,553 times
Reputation: 9913
I'm going with 75. Anything older than me, as far as architecture goes, I would consider old.

Gosh, even with the clarification, it still sounds bad. <oops>

Maybe a better way to put it: if it was built long before I was born, I would consider it old (since I'm getting old myself).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2016, 11:46 AM
 
10,608 posts, read 12,113,548 times
Reputation: 16779
I'd say 75 yeas or more.

Quote:
I would say 100 or more is old, Something 75 years or so I would call an older home.
This should be interesting to see other answers. Because surely it depends on what the definition of of "old" is
OldER should mean older than old. YET when I think of an OLD house I think of a house 100 years old or so.
YETm when I think of an oldER home, I think of a house "only" about 50-100 years old. Which is "newer/younger" that the old house that's 100 years old.

I DO crack up with amusement at young people or first time buyers who get caught up in wanting a new NEVER LIVED IN house. I'll here people say a 5-10 year old house is old. Give me a break. They'd rather have a new house, slapped together with NO quality of materials or workmanship, than a 15-20 year old house that's well made. It boggles the mind, or MY mind, at least
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2016, 11:52 AM
 
Location: Colorado
22,821 posts, read 6,431,335 times
Reputation: 7395
We had our house built 10 years ago, I still think of it as a new house.....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2016, 12:24 PM
 
5,048 posts, read 9,613,201 times
Reputation: 4181
Are you going for old or historic?

For historic, National Register says 50 unless they are exceptionally important.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2016, 12:43 PM
 
Location: North Idaho
32,632 posts, read 47,964,911 times
Reputation: 78367
I lived for 3 years in a house that was 350 years old. It was in perfect condition but you could tell it was old by the size of the hand hewn beams and the low ceilings and low doorways.

I also lived for 3 years in a cottage that was 500 years old. It was in good shape but drafty. Again with the low doorway heights.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2016, 12:44 PM
 
Location: The Triad
34,088 posts, read 82,911,742 times
Reputation: 43660
75 years (1941) just about sets the pre/post WW2 line.

Some really great houses were still being built in the 1950's...
but all manner of material and construction methods were beginning to change.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-17-2016, 01:31 PM
 
17,338 posts, read 11,259,569 times
Reputation: 40875
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrRational View Post
75 years (1941) just about sets the pre/post WW2 line.

Some really great houses were still being built in the 1950's...
but all manner of material and construction methods were beginning to change.
I agree, pre WWII.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:33 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top