Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-23-2017, 02:12 PM
 
Location: on the wind
23,306 posts, read 18,837,889 times
Reputation: 75317

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schmooky View Post
The assertion that it isn’t is a baseless talking point with an agenda that is predicated upon preservation instead of conservation, and has no regard for the people who actually have claim on the land.
Ahem; Unless you happen to be Gwich\'in represented by the Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, the only "claim" you have is the one you have on your employer...to treat you honestly while you work for them (wherever that happens to be).

Apologies to the mods for furthering thread drift.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-23-2017, 02:44 PM
 
8,574 posts, read 12,411,457 times
Reputation: 16533
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nikki Siam View Post
We had it in writing and took the letter to the audit and were told they aren't accountable for anything an agent might have told you.
The best thing to have in writing from the IRS would be a Private Letter Ruling. They're not for everyone, as the IRS charges a steep fee to get one, but that would be the best written guidance to have from the IRS.

Unfortunately, Private Letter Rulings do not create precedence, so it's still advisable to rely on lawyers or CPAs who keep up on tax court rulings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2017, 02:56 PM
 
Location: Silicon Valley
7,650 posts, read 4,599,879 times
Reputation: 12713
I think the OP has his answer where it doesn't look things are changing, but is there a way of putting a seller contingency in a situation like this? That is, seller accepts offer at price x if deal is completed by December 29, otherwise price y....or a penalty?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-23-2017, 03:06 PM
 
Location: Raleigh NC
25,116 posts, read 16,215,541 times
Reputation: 14408
anything you can write in the contract that both parties agree to.

On several occasions, I've had it be very clear "cannot close before _____ date" because the Seller has to hit the 2 year mark. At least once, I've had it "must close by_____" because they were going to hit the 3 years out of the house mark.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:33 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top