Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-02-2017, 07:01 AM
 
3,248 posts, read 2,457,038 times
Reputation: 7255

Advertisements

Ever go to see a house that looked incredible in the photos only to get there and be totally disappointed?

I feel as though real estate has gone the way of Match.com with some agents uploading pics that don't accurately convey the property. Of course everyone wants their house to be seen in the best light, but there are definitely some misleading photos out there.

Case in point, I recently viewed a property that looked like an absolute estate online. It appeared in the photos to have the world's largest and most incredible wrap around porch and a wide front lawn. In person, it was right up against a busy street and the porch was nowhere near as generous, but just a nice, normal sized porch. Wide angle lenses did the rest.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-02-2017, 07:14 AM
 
Location: Florida -
10,213 posts, read 14,839,105 times
Reputation: 21848
I've felt the same irritation! -- Why take spectacular, wide-angle, estate-looking photos of ordinary properties or otherwise very small rooms (or how about over-the-top descriptions)? Any potential buyer can't immediately see the difference upon viewing the actual property.

I think the realtor theory is that they can attract potential buyers they can steer to other properties - or 'talk' into buying, but, it leaves most people feeling somewhat hoodwinked. In retail, they call it 'bait and switch.' In RE, it is an unethical practice that causes people to mistrust realtors.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2017, 07:17 AM
 
Location: Jollyville, TX
5,868 posts, read 11,930,600 times
Reputation: 10918
Quote:
Originally Posted by emotiioo View Post
Ever go to see a house that looked incredible in the photos only to get there and be totally disappointed?

I feel as though real estate has gone the way of Match.com with some agents uploading pics that don't accurately convey the property. Of course everyone wants their house to be seen in the best light, but there are definitely some misleading photos out there.

Case in point, I recently viewed a property that looked like an absolute estate online. It appeared in the photos to have the world's largest and most incredible wrap around porch and a wide front lawn. In person, it was right up against a busy street and the porch was nowhere near as generous, but just a nice, normal sized porch. Wide angle lenses did the rest.
Yes, we ran into that quite a bit when house hunting. Those wide angle lenses should be banned from house pictures! I can't tell you how many times I went to view a house because it looked like it had a big beautiful kitchen and it was a normal or small kitchen that had been "enhanced" with the wide angle lens. I got to the point where if there were any wide angle lens pictures in the listing, I would cross it off my list.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2017, 08:04 AM
 
Location: Riverside Ca
22,146 posts, read 33,552,235 times
Reputation: 35437
Quote:
Originally Posted by emotiioo View Post
Ever go to see a house that looked incredible in the photos only to get there and be totally disappointed?

I feel as though real estate has gone the way of Match.com with some agents uploading pics that don't accurately convey the property. Of course everyone wants their house to be seen in the best light, but there are definitely some misleading photos out there.

Case in point, I recently viewed a property that looked like an absolute estate online. It appeared in the photos to have the world's largest and most incredible wrap around porch and a wide front lawn. In person, it was right up against a busy street and the porch was nowhere near as generous, but just a nice, normal sized porch. Wide angle lenses did the rest.
Oh yeah. Welcome to the world of wide angle and photoshop. The pics I despise are the ones that make everything look shiny new glossy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2017, 08:31 AM
 
Location: Cary, NC
43,299 posts, read 77,142,685 times
Reputation: 45659
OP, you are getting the photography that buyers and sellers demand.

No one who give photos much thought wants real depiction of their houses, with natural light, etc.
People want washed out, bright, HDR, wide angle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2017, 08:34 AM
 
Location: Southern California
12,713 posts, read 15,542,422 times
Reputation: 35512
The less "real looking" the pics looks the more you know they are trying to hide something. Look for bad lighting, wide angles, missing certain shots, not many shots of exterior or interior, weird really bright colors or bad quality in general.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2017, 09:42 AM
 
748 posts, read 833,659 times
Reputation: 508
Wide angle lenses are often necessary to capture an entire room in one shot.

Other practices (photo-shopping, sometimes virtual staging) is another matter. I'd prefer a home that looks a little better in images, but still shows the reality of the situation. Don't waste my time.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2017, 10:18 AM
 
Location: in a parallel universe
2,648 posts, read 2,317,214 times
Reputation: 5894
I detest those wide angle shots, and the photo's that make the home look like a painting. I just want to see real photo's of the house and yard.
I always wonder what they're hiding when they show photo's like that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2017, 10:49 AM
 
Location: Houston
26,979 posts, read 15,896,568 times
Reputation: 11259
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Geek View Post
The less "real looking" the pics looks the more you know they are trying to hide something. Look for bad lighting, wide angles, missing certain shots, not many shots of exterior or interior, weird really bright colors or bad quality in general.
It is what sellers demand and they are the clients. I don't think buyers demand pictures that cause them to waste their time looking at a home.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-02-2017, 11:37 AM
 
Location: USA
939 posts, read 788,778 times
Reputation: 1411
Quote:
Originally Posted by whogo View Post
It is what sellers demand and they are the clients... I don't think buyers demand pictures that cause them to waste their time looking at a home.
Then you don't know this buyer.

Not too long ago, the banks were demanding stated income that could cover the mortgage, so what they got were buyers(clients) who cosmetically doctored their earnings by saying they were (also) working for a friend who was paying them X amount in addition to their actual job...that financial theory eventually headed south, didn't it?

Don't think that cosmetically doctored pictures will do the same for the economy, but people will eventually get fed-up of being lied to, especially when they have to waste time and gas hunting down and driving to a property that has no resemblance to what they want, w/wo their agent checking out the home in person first.

Up until the seventies(?) some homeowners actually painted over fire-charred walls before listing their homes...remember the old adage uttered by agents and homeowners alike;

"A coat of paint covers a multitude of sins"... isn't that another case of "It's what the seller/client wants",... is not the buyer some sort of a client?


If "Client$" and Agent$ are supplying false documents via misleading pictures from the get-go, what are the contracts going to look like w/o a magnifying glass in front of a telescope?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:42 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top