Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-05-2018, 02:36 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,553 posts, read 81,067,970 times
Reputation: 57723

Advertisements

When a meter is changed out the following bill should show 4 readings

1. The last previously billed reading on the old meter
2. The removal reading on the old meter
3. The installation reading (often 0000000) on the new meter
4. The bill period end date reading on the new meter

The difference between the readings on the old meter is added to the difference in readings on the new meter to determine the consumption.

What can happen with human error or billing system bug is that the customer is billed for the consumption between readings 1. and 4. above.

If the reading 1. on the old meter was something like 9018920 and reading 4. on the new meter was something like 0000023 then the calculation would be based on the old meter going all the way around to 9999999 then 0000000 and starting over, resulting in a huge bill as in this case.

If your bill does not show all 4 of those readings you should at the very least ask to see them. I have seen this happen often when the new meter is read for the current billing cycle before the meter exchange has been entered into the system or it was entered incorrectly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-05-2018, 03:04 PM
 
3,217 posts, read 2,424,750 times
Reputation: 6328
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
When a meter is changed out the following bill should show 4 readings

1. The last previously billed reading on the old meter
2. The removal reading on the old meter
3. The installation reading (often 0000000) on the new meter
4. The bill period end date reading on the new meter

The difference between the readings on the old meter is added to the difference in readings on the new meter to determine the consumption.

What can happen with human error or billing system bug is that the customer is billed for the consumption between readings 1. and 4. above.

If the reading 1. on the old meter was something like 9018920 and reading 4. on the new meter was something like 0000023 then the calculation would be based on the old meter going all the way around to 9999999 then 0000000 and starting over, resulting in a huge bill as in this case.

If your bill does not show all 4 of those readings you should at the very least ask to see them. I have seen this happen often when the new meter is read for the current billing cycle before the meter exchange has been entered into the system or it was entered incorrectly.
Bingo, sounds like the problem and something for others who are currently having their electric companies switch out their meters. Be there, jot down the reading of the old meter (you have the previous bill), jot down the beginning reading of the new meter, keep all those numbers until your bill comes in.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2018, 04:41 PM
 
5,444 posts, read 6,986,300 times
Reputation: 15147
Quote:
Originally Posted by Informed Info View Post


The current bill that is due on 3/13/2018 shows the ridiculously high usage. 545K gallons.

When the water dept person was out, he checked how many units had been used SINCE 1/08/2018 and it was "normal".
Thanks for the clarification. I hope you get this squared away. Sad that the water company thinks that you actually used that much water.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2018, 05:50 PM
 
10,181 posts, read 10,251,551 times
Reputation: 9252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
When a meter is changed out the following bill should show 4 readings

1. The last previously billed reading on the old meter
2. The removal reading on the old meter
3. The installation reading (often 0000000) on the new meter
4. The bill period end date reading on the new meter

The difference between the readings on the old meter is added to the difference in readings on the new meter to determine the consumption.

What can happen with human error or billing system bug is that the customer is billed for the consumption between readings 1. and 4. above.

If the reading 1. on the old meter was something like 9018920 and reading 4. on the new meter was something like 0000023 then the calculation would be based on the old meter going all the way around to 9999999 then 0000000 and starting over, resulting in a huge bill as in this case.

If your bill does not show all 4 of those readings you should at the very least ask to see them. I have seen this happen often when the new meter is read for the current billing cycle before the meter exchange has been entered into the system or it was entered incorrectly.
Thank you for the information.

I don't know if that is the issue & only due to the fact that this is not the first bill we've received since the old meter replaced with the smart meter. The previous quarter fell in to the "normal" range for this property.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2018, 07:15 PM
 
Location: East of Seattle since 1992, 615' Elevation, Zone 8b - originally from SF Bay Area
44,553 posts, read 81,067,970 times
Reputation: 57723
Another issue is that quarterly billing is irresponsible. Monthly is best, though many utilities that still read meters with humans do bimonthly to save labor cost. The longer between bills, the longer any hidden leak will be running before you have any indication.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2018, 07:57 PM
 
4,567 posts, read 10,649,039 times
Reputation: 6730
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
Another issue is that quarterly billing is irresponsible.
Any water bill I've ever had at any house has been quarterly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-05-2018, 10:30 PM
 
10,181 posts, read 10,251,551 times
Reputation: 9252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemlock140 View Post
Another issue is that quarterly billing is irresponsible. Monthly is best, though many utilities that still read meters with humans do bimonthly to save labor cost. The longer between bills, the longer any hidden leak will be running before you have any indication.
Unfortunately I have no control over the space in time of the water/sewer billing "charged for" cycle.

Never had an issue with it before (20+ years).

The issue remains that we don't have a hidden leak. The meter wouldn't be reading "normal" for the time between the outrageous bill & the human reading before the changing out of old smart meter to a new smart meter & units used.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2018, 06:10 AM
 
Location: Ocala, FL
6,470 posts, read 10,329,163 times
Reputation: 7898
Quote:
Originally Posted by 399083453 View Post
Any water bill I've ever had at any house has been quarterly.
And mine has ALWAYS been monthly.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2018, 08:38 AM
 
Location: Alexandria, VA
15,142 posts, read 27,756,930 times
Reputation: 27255
I would much rather have quarterly- used to be that way (it was quarterly combined water/trash/sewage) - they split it all out so now instead of 4 bills/yr. I get 24!! I also have to pay more as they charge a min. for water every month whether it is used or not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-06-2018, 09:36 AM
 
661 posts, read 832,116 times
Reputation: 840
Put the water bill in a the name of a separate LLC in the future, kind of ridiculous they city will not allow tenants to put water in their name.

City is only lookout for themselves and knows it easier to collect from a owner vs a tenant. But why should the landlord be liable for the tenants use of water, so so the city can collect. That should be the cities problem as the tenant is the one using the water the contract should be water company with tenant.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:03 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top