Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 07-11-2019, 05:58 PM
 
2 posts, read 3,721 times
Reputation: 10

Advertisements

In contract on a house in Warren county- inspection turned up 3 cesspools. 2 cesspools service the 3-bedroom main house and 1 cesspool services the 1 bedroom 1 bath guesthouse. Seller refuses to address the cesspool for the guest house. They have offered to do a 3-bedroom septic for the main house and say that the cesspool for the guest house is on us. They claim the law does not apply to “outbuildings” and that they can legally sell the house with the cesspool serving the second house on the property. Is this true?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 07-11-2019, 07:48 PM
 
8,573 posts, read 12,403,094 times
Reputation: 16527
You'd be better off contacting the Warren County Health Department for your answer. A phone number can be found at this link:
County of Warren, NJ - Health Department

Whether or not they can legally convey the property, however, you'd need to decide if you'd want to be stuck paying for removing the cesspool and putting in another septic system--and whether there is actually room for another septic system on-site. As you likely know, putting in septic systems can be very expensive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2019, 04:47 AM
 
480 posts, read 480,566 times
Reputation: 823
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirktuck View Post
In contract on a house in Warren county- inspection turned up 3 cesspools. 2 cesspools service the 3-bedroom main house and 1 cesspool services the 1 bedroom 1 bath guesthouse. Seller refuses to address the cesspool for the guest house. They have offered to do a 3-bedroom septic for the main house and say that the cesspool for the guest house is on us. They claim the law does not apply to “outbuildings” and that they can legally sell the house with the cesspool serving the second house on the property. Is this true?
The seller is wrong. NJDEP, not the County Board of Health has final word on this issue. See my response to your post in the New Jersey forum:

//www.city-data.com/forum/new-j...-if-guest.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2019, 09:55 AM
 
8,573 posts, read 12,403,094 times
Reputation: 16527
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swamp_Yankee View Post
The seller is wrong. NJDEP, not the County Board of Health has final word on this issue. See my response to your post in the New Jersey forum:

//www.city-data.com/forum/new-j...-if-guest.html
I've read your reply in the OP's other thread in the NJ forum. Based solely on the information that you provided, it appears that the transaction could legally occur, but that the OP would no longer be able to continue use of the cesspool after the transfer. It would be rather foolish to buy a property with those restrictions--at least without confirming that there is adequate room to install another system and the costs involved. Still, it would be best to have everything resolved before purchasing the property, if the OP intends to go through with the purchase.

Quote:
(c) A cesspool that is not malfunctioning may continue to serve the structure after a real property transfer only in the following circumstances:
Further questions should be directed to the County Health Department and to the OP's attorney.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2019, 12:08 PM
 
480 posts, read 480,566 times
Reputation: 823
Quote:
Originally Posted by jackmichigan View Post
I've read your reply in the OP's other thread in the NJ forum. Based solely on the information that you provided, it appears that the transaction could legally occur, but that the OP would no longer be able to continue use of the cesspool after the transfer. It would be rather foolish to buy a property with those restrictions--at least without confirming that there is adequate room to install another system and the costs involved. Still, it would be best to have everything resolved before purchasing the property, if the OP intends to go through with the purchase.
What I took from the OP's post was that the seller basically told him that according to NJ law that he could legally transfer the property to the OP via a conventional sale and that the OP could continue to use the guest house with the existing cesspool since it is not tied in with the primary dwelling. The OP then pushed back on that and the seller essentially said "fine, but since replacement of the cesspool is not required by law (so they claim), you can pay to have a system installed to service the guest house." The NJ law governing subsurface disposal systems is perfectly clear that functioning cesspools can only continue to be used under very narrow circumstances and this is not one of them, so the seller is still wrong in saying that the OP could buy the property and continue to use the guest house with cesspool simply because it is not the primary dwelling.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackmichigan View Post
Further questions should be directed to the County Health Department and to the OP's attorney.
In all honesty, further questions would be better directed to an experienced engineer who has designed many septic systems in that particular county. Attorneys (and Realtors) tend to be quite limited in their knowledge of N.J.A.C.7:9A in my experience. They see septic issues as an annoyance that slows down transactions and would rather muddle through in the interest of closing. Hiring a good engineer is your best bet to end up with a good system that will last many years with proper care. A situation like this presents many possibilities-depending on how close the structures are to one another (and the existing site conditions) it may be better to install a four bedroom (or more, if expansion of either structure is desired in the future) septic system that serves both structures. Or, if they are not close enough, two separate systems with room for future expansion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2019, 02:27 PM
 
8,573 posts, read 12,403,094 times
Reputation: 16527
Quote:
Originally Posted by Swamp_Yankee View Post
What I took from the OP's post was that the seller basically told him that according to NJ law that he could legally transfer the property to the OP via a conventional sale AND that the OP could continue to use the guest house with the existing cesspool since it is not tied in with the primary dwelling. The OP then pushed back on that and the seller essentially said "fine, but since replacement of the cesspool is not required by law (so they claim), you can pay to have a system installed to service the guest house." The NJ law governing subsurface disposal systems is perfectly clear that functioning cesspools can only continue to be used under very narrow circumstances and this is not one of them, so the seller is still wrong in saying that the OP could buy the property and continue to use the guest house with cesspool simply because it is not the primary dwelling.
Our understandings of the situation are somewhat different. Perhaps the OP could clarify.

My understanding was that the Seller said that they would pay to take care of the cesspool for the house, but that the OP would need to pay to take care of the cesspool for the guesthouse on their own. To wit:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirktuck View Post
They have offered to do a 3-bedroom septic for the main house and say that the cesspool for the guest house is on us.
That was followed by a somewhat confusing two-part scenario:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirktuck View Post
They claim the law does not apply to “outbuildings” and that they can legally sell the house with the cesspool serving the second house on the property. Is this true?
The part about the "outbuilding" is pure BS, but the Seller, according to the citation you provided, could legally sell the property with the cesspool intact, if the OP agreed to that. It's just that the OP could no longer use that cesspool and would need to pay out of his own pocket to take care of it after the closing.

I mentioned the Health Department or attorney as sources of verifying information only to the point as to whether the Seller could legally sell the property without first removing the cesspool. I wholeheartedly agree that your suggestion below is the most important aspect to consider. Consulting with a professional on the whole issue surrounding the septic system is a given.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Swamp_Yankee View Post
In all honesty, further questions would be better directed to an experienced engineer who has designed many septic systems in that particular county. Attorneys (and Realtors) tend to be quite limited in their knowledge of N.J.A.C.7:9A in my experience. They see septic issues as an annoyance that slows down transactions and would rather muddle through in the interest of closing. Hiring a good engineer is your best bet to end up with a good system that will last many years with proper care. A situation like this presents many possibilities-depending on how close the structures are to one another (and the existing site conditions) it may be better to install a four bedroom (or more, if expansion of either structure is desired in the future) septic system that serves both structures. Or, if they are not close enough, two separate systems with room for future expansion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 07-12-2019, 03:03 PM
 
480 posts, read 480,566 times
Reputation: 823
Now I get where you're coming from. It's absolutely legal to sell a property with an active cesspool, it's just that the cesspool has to be decommissioned upon execution of the transaction and cannot be used unless the transaction meets one of the 14 exemptions. Normally this is pretty routine in that you're dealing with one cesspool which is the sole means of disposing of wastewater on the property. In that case the only option and normal course of action is to simply replace the cesspool with a septic system.

In this case, the main house will be taken care of but the question is what to do with the guest house. An interesting thought would be whether or not the guest house cesspool could simply be properly abandoned and the guest house no longer considered habitable which could potentially save the OP money on the transaction in the short run and on property taxes in the long run-assuming he had no need for the guest house to actually be a guest house. Of course, the guest house is also likely an existing non-conforming use and converting it to a non-habitable structure would jeopardize that. Probably a good idea to speak with the town Zoning Officer and Tax Assessor as well.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top