Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-01-2020, 05:52 PM
 
106,653 posts, read 108,790,719 times
Reputation: 80143

Advertisements

If you are not over the limit then there is no place to report a primary home sale on your taxes ....unless you had unqualified use..taxes are pretty much the honor system until they question you.

In fact we sold a 2nd home ,there was nothing even asked about it being a primary ...no one at the closing cares ..it is on you
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-01-2020, 06:20 PM
 
Location: North Idaho
726 posts, read 328,867 times
Reputation: 953
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
Yes , as long as it was your primary first you are not mixed up in the prorating ..... You are fine .....
Great. Thanks!

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonahWicky View Post
I'd suggest you speak to a tax lawyer who can give you a definitive answer, rather than relying on a bunch of random strangers on the internet.
Generally, that's good advice. I did the research though, and triple checked the language. I'm darn near certain of my conclusion, but it's nice to get some additional, independent confirmation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2020, 11:24 AM
 
Location: Southern New Hampshire
10,048 posts, read 18,066,509 times
Reputation: 35846
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamingo13 View Post
OP has apparently already decided what the rules are as they apply to him/her- not sure why a question was asked in that case.
^^^ This. OP, Mathjak was trying to be HELPFUL by providing accurate information, and you were just plain rude because his answer wasn't what you hoped for. Even when it was clear he was right, you couldn't even say something as simple as "Yeah, sorry for calling BS." (Why is that so hard for people? Have you never been wrong? )

Mathjak, you showed by post #9 why the IRS needs better tech writers!! My tax situation is typically pretty straightforward but when it's not, my brain goes a bit numb after reading the IRS rules 20-30 times.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2020, 02:30 PM
 
106,653 posts, read 108,790,719 times
Reputation: 80143
Quote:
Originally Posted by karen_in_nh_2012 View Post
^^^ This. OP, Mathjak was trying to be HELPFUL by providing accurate information, and you were just plain rude because his answer wasn't what you hoped for. Even when it was clear he was right, you couldn't even say something as simple as "Yeah, sorry for calling BS." (Why is that so hard for people? Have you never been wrong? )

Mathjak, you showed by post #9 why the IRS needs better tech writers!! My tax situation is typically pretty straightforward but when it's not, my brain goes a bit numb after reading the IRS rules 20-30 times.
it wasn't flamingo who called bs , it was daxhound who was wrong and never apologized .

Quote:
Originally Posted by DAXhound View Post
Yes, I say BS on math jack... I did look at 523..grey as a battleship. Residency means so many different things. The property is not listed as a rental, nor will it be. And, I will bet that I could use date of purchase to establish in state residency for tuition purposes at the State University.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2020, 03:16 PM
 
Location: Alexandria, VA
15,143 posts, read 27,776,049 times
Reputation: 27265
That is what Karen posted... that OP was rude. She? agreed with me
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2020, 03:30 PM
 
106,653 posts, read 108,790,719 times
Reputation: 80143
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamingo13 View Post
That is what Karen posted... that OP was rude. She? agreed with me
Oh okay ....all good
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2020, 05:53 PM
 
Location: Southern New Hampshire
10,048 posts, read 18,066,509 times
Reputation: 35846
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
Oh okay ....all good
Mathjak, come on, your reading comprehension is usually excellent! Yes, I was saying it was the OP who called BS and never apologized even when it was clear you were right. Flamingo13's post was absolutely correct -- you simply did not give the OP the answer he wanted so he chose to be really rude. Oh, well -- at least others will hopefully learn something from this thread.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-02-2020, 06:25 PM
 
Location: Avignon, France
11,162 posts, read 7,959,249 times
Reputation: 28947
After all of your appeals have been exhausted? Lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2020, 12:14 AM
 
1,473 posts, read 1,419,895 times
Reputation: 1671
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
here you go . this is an easy explanation of the tax laws as they changed .

buying in advance is now prorated-period . This new proration portion of § 121 kicked in on January 1, 2009, so all rental usage or vacation home usage before then is a freebie, so long as you meet the 2-out-of-5 rule before you sell. but all that changed on jan 1 2009 when prorating started .

it was done to stop everyone who were buying 2nd homes and rentals and then converting them to a primaty and taking the full exclusion .

so don't be so quick to think you know it all . that is why we have tax experts .

homes that are rentals , 2nd homes or vacation homes are all considered the same non qualified use today. if you want to read through the irs info on it you need to go to unqualified use on section 121 .

but this explanation is pretty simple

https://www.financialsamurai.com/tax...-primary-home/
This article gives numerous examples, all of which involve rental properties, which mine is not. The law was changed to prevent people from moving into rentals or second homes to get the exclusion. It wasn't meant to punish people, who are trapped in a foreign country during a pandemic, or simply have to travel for work. And again, a baseball player, who buys a house, but spends months a year on the road?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-03-2020, 12:31 AM
 
1,473 posts, read 1,419,895 times
Reputation: 1671
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathjak107 View Post
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO .
And this is a polite way to answer a question?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:04 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top