Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 06-27-2008, 11:58 AM
 
315 posts, read 349,472 times
Reputation: 54

Advertisements

Oh. You are a she. Esplains everthing Lucy!
You 'are' Suzanne.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 06-27-2008, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Chino, CA
1,458 posts, read 3,282,892 times
Reputation: 557
Quote:
Originally Posted by Humanoid View Post
Take two people one who rents with a total cost of around $2000/month and another whole really owns his house and pays around $500/month in taxes, insurance and maintenance. Without considering taxes the first guy will have to earn $18,000 more a year to live the same life style as the second guy. But if you consider the way taxes are bracketed he has to make more like $21,000~$24,000 more depending on your actual tax bracket. So the first guy ends up saving thousands in taxes despite having the save lifestyle. The point is that the dividends you receive from your house are never taxed so if you own free and clear that reduces your tax load.


I consider it paying large amounts of money to the bank. Most of your mortgage payment goes to interest, that isn't savings its renting money from the bank.
Hi Humanoid,
Thanks for the explanation. Someday, we hope to be in that situation. Meanwhile we'll have to pay a mortgage. I do understand amortization schedules, so I know that most of it goes to Interest and slowly more goes into principal. That is what I meant by "forced" savings - the Principal part that grows over time. Additionally, as was argued before, when Interest is being paid... in that time period about a third or so can be applied for tax deductions.

So overall I agree with the others that long term wise home ownership just in the financial sense outstrips renting. With prices favoring buyers and the natural "benefit" of homeownership, I see things shifting or bottoming out faster than others. Of course it depends greatly on the economy.

Since we're returning back to a "natural" market (right now I think sales is lower than natural)... macro and micro economic factors will come into play. Hence why I mentioned those.

FMV,
There's no need to get riled up about Bottom Rider's comments or any comments on these forums.... he is what he is and there's always room for all types/opinions on these forums. It's nice to see that you and your husband have such good communication.

-chuck22b

Last edited by chuck22b; 06-27-2008 at 12:11 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2008, 12:42 PM
 
315 posts, read 349,472 times
Reputation: 54
'he is what he is'

Yes and that would be somebody with humor and a realist.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2008, 12:46 PM
 
315 posts, read 349,472 times
Reputation: 54
' Since we're returning back to a "natural" market'

Really? Decline until hitting bottom is a natural market? Then stagnant for some time? thats a natural market? wow.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2008, 01:14 PM
 
Location: Humboldt Park, Chicago
2,686 posts, read 7,868,329 times
Reputation: 1196
Default Humanoid

Humanoid,

Please let me know what real life experience you have in real estate and what you do for work. Thanks.

You have alot of good information and have provided very insightful discussions.

Chet,

I will DM you, as you and I seem to have similar experiences in investment real estate in Chicago.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2008, 02:01 PM
 
945 posts, read 1,987,384 times
Reputation: 361
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuck22b View Post
Hi Humanoid,
Thanks for the explanation. Someday, we hope to be in that situation. Meanwhile we'll have to pay a mortgage. I do understand amortization schedules, so I know that most of it goes to Interest and slowly more goes into principal. That is what I meant by "forced" savings - the Principal part that grows over time. Additionally, as was argued before, when Interest is being paid... in that time period about a third or so can be applied for tax deductions.

So overall I agree with the others that long term wise home ownership just in the financial sense outstrips renting. With prices favoring buyers and the natural "benefit" of homeownership, I see things shifting or bottoming out faster than others. Of course it depends greatly on the economy.

Since we're returning back to a "natural" market (right now I think sales is lower than natural)... macro and micro economic factors will come into play. Hence why I mentioned those.

FMV,
There's no need to get riled up about Bottom Rider's comments or any comments on these forums.... he is what he is and there's always room for all types/opinions on these forums. It's nice to see that you and your husband have such good communication.

-chuck22b

You're right, Chuck, thanks
from "the little wifey" of FMV
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2008, 05:06 PM
 
945 posts, read 1,987,384 times
Reputation: 361
Have a link for your reading pleasure.

KCfromNC, Humanoid, Sheri257, middle-aged-mom, SoCal Bottom feeder, this is for you. I sent it on another thread in the Chicago suburb forum but wanted to make sure you all got it. Still believing!
FMV-the guy!
http://rereport.com/sdc/print/SDCNCCJimKlinge.pdf
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2008, 05:23 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles Area
3,306 posts, read 4,153,400 times
Reputation: 592
Quote:
You know alot but how much real life experience do you have?
The arguments I'm giving have nothing to do with "real life experience" or what I do for a living or anything else of that nature.

Quote:
You will understand much better for yourself once you have lived it.
Huh? I'm talking about finance. Its just numbers how will living in a home help me understand the financial impact of ownership vs renting better? It won't. Perhaps what you have in mind are the emotional aspects ownership....those don't interest me nearly as much as the financial impact.

Quote:
...but long-term it is generally better to own than rent. People simply don't save like they say they are going to. You may be the exception.
The idea that owning a home is "saving" is odd to say the least. Would you set up a savings account that took 50 cents for every dollar you put in? Also, I should add that now with things like home equity lines of credit the "savings" in your home is no longer safe from abuse like it use to be. Also, whether owning is better than renting (in a normal market) depends greatly on the person. You can't make a general claim about it. If you tend to move every 4-5 years then owning has little advantage even in a normal real estate market. When the market is normal the "break even" point between renting and owning is usually around 4 years. Own less than 4 and you should have rented own more and you start gain. In that sense buying a investment property and planning on selling it in 5-6 years makes little sense. By the way I would be really surprised to find a property would cash-flow when it was purchased in 2006, what are the details?

Quote:
grossly that a home would never recover it's purchase value and lose anyone that much $ over a 10 year period
The problem again is you don't make a distinction between real vs nominal prices. If you bought your home for 500k in 2006 and sold for 660k in 2016 you've made nothing (assuming inflation at 3%). There was no "rebound" in the price its just an illusion created by inflation.

Quote:
I suppose if through some magic you were able to amass enough cash to buy a place with no mortgage
Some magic? Geez....I didn't know investing was magic but alright. Regardless, there are middle paths you could take. Like take out a 15-year fixed instead of a 30-year fixed. 30-year fixed is a pretty insane loan most people sell their home before they start to pay much principle down on the loan. At least with a 15-year fixed you start paying a decent amount of principle from the start.

Quote:
You 'are' Suzanne.
Haha, yeah oddly she is trying to Suzanne people on city-data. That should just stop at her husband.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2008, 05:26 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles Area
3,306 posts, read 4,153,400 times
Reputation: 592
Quote:
Have a link for your reading pleasure.
I read his blog all the time (www.blubbleinfo.com (broken link)) all the time. He doesn't think the market is going up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 06-27-2008, 05:42 PM
 
Location: Chino, CA
1,458 posts, read 3,282,892 times
Reputation: 557
Quote:
Originally Posted by Humanoid View Post
The idea that owning a home is "saving" is odd to say the least. Would you set up a savings account that took 50 cents for every dollar you put in? Also, I should add that now with things like home equity lines of credit the "savings" in your home is no longer safe from abuse like it use to be. Also, whether owning is better than renting (in a normal market) depends greatly on the person. You can't make a general claim about it.
Owning a home is a forced savings plan because with every payment a fraction of your payment goes into principal. This means that the percent that you own of the home increases (very small at first but increases over time).

Therefore irregardless of market price, if you have equity in your home you get a piece of the pie. If you fully own your home you get the whole pie. You don't get any return from rental payments... and regardless if you rent or own, you'll have to make some sort of payment to live. Unless you are a dependent or don't have to pay anything for housing.

What would you do in this scenario:

For someone that'll be in the same place for 5+ years and already know the area:

Let's say you have the option of renting a house for $2,000 a month (+$20 for rental insurance?) or buy an equivalent house with a mortgage of $2150 (including taxes, principal, insurance, and interest payments). Which would you choose if you are "waiting" to buy a house and why?

Home ownership with tax deduction would make the $2,150 be closer to $1,827 (that's using a tax benefit of 15% from interest payments). Furthermore, a small fraction of the $2,150 is going into principal which increases ownership.

Would it make sense in this case to purchase a home?

-chuck22b

Last edited by chuck22b; 06-27-2008 at 06:06 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:13 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top