U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Thread summary:

Real estate: affordable, mortgage, housing, market, 30 year loan.

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-15-2009, 02:38 PM
 
Location: Escondido, CA
1,503 posts, read 5,922,840 times
Reputation: 884

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
And if you do the math..that falls into to 5-6X salary to home..still to high of a debt ratio.
High by historical standards ... however, history was written when interest rates weren't in the 4's.

Median family income in the U.S. is $60,374.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-15-2009, 03:02 PM
 
22,769 posts, read 29,498,791 times
Reputation: 14693
Quote:
Originally Posted by esmith143 View Post
High by historical standards ... however, history was written when interest rates weren't in the 4's.

Median family income in the U.S. is $60,374.
History was also written when we didn't have negative household savings rates.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2009, 03:43 PM
 
Location: Minnesota
959 posts, read 1,767,616 times
Reputation: 758
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
If median income is $50K then NAR is telling people they can affort 5-6X their salaries on a home ?
Nope..that is just asking for trouble. Get back to the 2.5-3X range and THEN homes become affordable.

There are MANY homes in my area that would work for the median income. The problem? The people who make the median income, dont' want them. they want homes that are $100,000 MORE than what they actually afford and they want home owners to drop their prices to THEIR levels so they can have the granite and stainless steel. They won't settle for a starter home. They want more. That is part of the huge problem that I see.

Kristine
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2009, 04:01 PM
 
28,790 posts, read 45,494,146 times
Reputation: 37871
We'll wait. When house prices are realistic we will buy. Until then I see no reason to even consider it.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2009, 04:37 PM
 
Location: Barrington
63,948 posts, read 44,086,532 times
Reputation: 20645
Quote:
Originally Posted by boocake View Post

Does that make anyone take pause at the fact that the general consensus seems to be that homes are still 20 to 30% (in general) overpriced?
The NAR rosy picture balances unrealistic perceptions, like this.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2009, 05:25 PM
 
945 posts, read 1,919,947 times
Reputation: 361
Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by boocake View Post
Does that make anyone take pause at the fact that the general consensus seems to be that homes are still 20 to 30% (in general) overpriced?
The only ones polled in this "consensus" are the ones who are wishing to buy and hoping the nice home they really seek, comes down to this unrealistic "20-30%". It won't happen, especially since homes already started dropping in late 2006, through '07, and 1/2 of '08. You can't honestly think that after some areas have already fallen 30%, they go another 20-30? That would really mean 50-60%. Boy, do I feel like a broken record!!! Again, I read posts like this and wonder where you've been. The bubble didn't just burst last month, people!!! We've been addressing this for well over a year now. And just think of states like CA,FL,AZ,NV. You think any seller expects after already losing 40 and even 50%, they are going to go another 20-30%? Do the math!
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2009, 05:26 PM
 
945 posts, read 1,919,947 times
Reputation: 361
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammy5 View Post
There are MANY homes in my area that would work for the median income. The problem? The people who make the median income, dont' want them. they want homes that are $100,000 MORE than what they actually afford and they want home owners to drop their prices to THEIR levels so they can have the granite and stainless steel. They won't settle for a starter home. They want more. That is part of the huge problem that I see.

Kristine
Exactly!
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-15-2009, 06:09 PM
 
Location: Tampa, FL
2,637 posts, read 12,254,261 times
Reputation: 3620
Quote:
And just think of states like CA,FL,AZ,NV. You think any seller expects after already losing 40 and even 50%, they are going to go another 20-30%? Do the math!
In my area, the median price more than doubled in the space of what... 6 years iirc? If prices wind up at 40 to 50% off peak prices that would put us right about where we would historically expect to be if the bubble had not happened. It's not about what sellers expect or want, it's about what the market will bear. Without the insanely loose lending standards that fueled the bubble, prices must return to parity with income levels which were stagnant at best over the same period that saw astronomical appreciation in housing. Considering rising unemployment and wage cuts it's not unrealistic to expect prices to overshoot even beyond 50% off peak on the way down. When all those option ARMs start to reset it will exert even more downward pressure, and all the sub-prime foreclosures haven't worked their way out of the system yet.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2009, 12:51 AM
 
Location: Humboldt Park, Chicago
2,686 posts, read 7,606,926 times
Reputation: 1195
Default middle aged mom and fmv

Are prices still dropping in Wheaton and suburban dupage county? The numbers I have seen show they are and that we have not hit bottom price-wise.

FMV,

You seem to state that Wheaton hit bottom price-wise in mid to late 2008. I disagree, respectfully. You and your wife are smart people, but we see this differently.

MiddleagedMom,

You are relator out in Barrington area. I am sure you know more about real estate in Wheaton and Dupage than either FMV or I (we each own places in Dupage County, Itasca for me and Wheaton for FMV). Thanks.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2009, 08:34 AM
 
Location: Rockport Texas from El Paso
2,601 posts, read 8,223,622 times
Reputation: 1604
Prices are still dropping almost everywhere - so if homes are affordable now they will be more affordable later in the year. Of course more jobs may be lost - so it cuts both ways.
Rate this post positively Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2023, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top