Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-01-2009, 08:37 AM
 
830 posts, read 1,065,469 times
Reputation: 129

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TexasHorseLady View Post
Mike, I tried to rep you for that most excellent post, but apparently I've repped you too recently to do that. (I always rep the post, not the poster, so I lose track of who I've repped recently.)

Huzzah! nonetheless.
Hey TexasHorse, how's the studying going?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-01-2009, 08:44 AM
 
Location: Cary, NC
43,334 posts, read 77,198,405 times
Reputation: 45665
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrozenAngel View Post
Yes, and if you did all of the above for my company, I COULD NOT JUST GIVE YOU A 1099!!!! You would have to GO ON THE BOOKS!!!! Again, why?.
You just need professional help like a better accountant or tax attorney if they are telling you that you cannot engage independent contractors within the law and still have independent contractors for payroll purposes.

I am an independent contractor, right down the list.
There is no doubt in my mind.

This is not my first gig as an independent contractor. I have see it done wrong and done right.
We are doing it right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2009, 08:48 AM
 
Location: Olympia
1,024 posts, read 4,141,784 times
Reputation: 846
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrozenAngel View Post
The flip side of the coin is the largest restaurant in my area has hundreds of people working for him. He has to pay worker's compensation on each one of them. he has to have taxes deducted for each worker's check. he has to carry health insurance and 401k's and his insurance is extremely high because of the hi risk factor of someone getting hurt. Are you getting this? Or do you just not want to admit you have such an edge on the rest of us business owners?
Consider these questions:
Can the restaurant employees show up at work whenever they want?
Can they go on vacation whenever, or for how ever long they want?
Can they choose who they want to serve, or wait on?
Can they choose how they go about their work, or what the outcome is?
Do they have to bring in their own chairs, tables, linens and silverware for their customers?
Can the waiters decide to only serve beef dishes, but not chicken?

Do you get it now?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2009, 08:51 AM
 
Location: Salem, OR
15,586 posts, read 40,468,715 times
Reputation: 17498
Quote:
Originally Posted by MsFancyPants View Post
Well, I agree that Silverfall answered A PART of the question. However, what about the offices who require floor time and phone hours? Aren't they "controlling or directing" your time? And what about when the broker refuses to let you take a listing for reduced commission? Aren't they "controlling or directing" the outcome of your bottom line? What about NOT allowing you to work for several brokers? One of the prongs of the independent contractor status is that you NOT work for one employer specifically.

While I don't think it's a conspiracy or something evil, I do think that under closer scrutiny, real estate agents fail the independent contractor status test on a few levels.
Requiring phone time and floor time seems like it could fall into employee category. I don't know any local companies that require it. The agents are free to sign up when it works for them. I know a couple of real estate companies have gotten dinged and had to pay back employee taxes because they did indeed put many restrictions on the business practices of their independent contractors that they were no longer contractors.

The broker can refuse to let you take a reduced commission because according to STATE laws the listing is with the broker. The agent, the independent contractor, is acting on behalf of the broker.

As for not allowing you to work with several brokers, there are agency issues at play there and that is a state law issue. If you have an agent working at brokerage ABC and they have a client who wants to write an offer on a home that the same agent has listed with company XYZ, then you have some really icky agency issues to deal with in terms of representation of the clients. I know an agent that works with a firm in Portland Oregon and a different company in Vancouver Washington. Agents can work for different firms. Most just don't want to.

There is IRS tax law and then state laws. Agents follow both.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2009, 08:53 AM
 
982 posts, read 1,101,382 times
Reputation: 249
I agree that there are ways to pigeonhole into the independent contractor status. I did it myself. I was no more "independent," than most employees. Like in restaurants. Waiter has a shift. He doesn't have to show up as long as he gets someone to cover it. They pay less than minimum wage in some states and they're free to work at as many restaurants as they want. They get bartenders and busboys, but they have to pay them out of their tips. So that "service" is a job expense. They schedule a meeting when a person isn't scheduled to work, you don't get paid to attend the meeting. The meeting isn't "mandatory," so no reqmt to pay you. It goes on and on.

I think the whole concept of "independent contractors," is for like consultants who have a specialty and they go from company to company working for a short period of time on a project.

When you have an agent who only works for Century 21, they're an employee even if they do "meet the criteria."

I think what Angel is trying to say is that there are a lot of industries who treat their "employees," the same way as independent real estate agents but they also call them employees and offer them benefits and wages and support, et cetera, because they feel like they are employees.

Her post was how the RE industry got started with this practice of independent contractors v. employees and why. I think the why of it is simple. It's cheaper and most cost effective for them. It's more costly for the consumer.

If agents were employees, they wouldn't make six figures a year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2009, 08:57 AM
 
Location: Salem, OR
15,586 posts, read 40,468,715 times
Reputation: 17498
Quote:
Originally Posted by MsFancyPants View Post
It's more costly for the consumer.
That's not the reason for the high costs to the consumer. The reasons for the high costs is the all or nothing payment method of commissions.

Agents close some deals and don't close others. Agents take a risk and as such the reward has to be great to make it worth the risk.

If consumers would pay agents an hourly rate, you could cut real estate fees down significantly. They just don't want to do that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2009, 08:58 AM
 
982 posts, read 1,101,382 times
Reputation: 249
Because agents erroneously think (I saw it posted here) that their services are worth $60/hour. LOL!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2009, 08:59 AM
 
Location: Cary, NC
43,334 posts, read 77,198,405 times
Reputation: 45665
Quote:
Originally Posted by MsFancyPants View Post
If agents were employees, they wouldn't make six figures a year.

Two proofs needed here to avoid falling into the Angel category:

1. Agents make 6 figures a year.

2. If agents were employees, they would not make 6 figures a year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2009, 09:01 AM
 
Location: Central Texas
20,958 posts, read 45,434,410 times
Reputation: 24745
I think where you saw that posted (if it's the same place I did) was that the courts somewhere determined that that was the going rate for a real estate agent to be paid for appearing as an expert in court or something. But I could be misremembering the details, I suppose.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-01-2009, 09:02 AM
 
982 posts, read 1,101,382 times
Reputation: 249
I don't have to offer proof. And I would be proud to fall into the "Angel category." Just as long as you don't put me in the "other" category.

Look, this is a discussion board. If you don't like the post, don't read it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:43 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top