Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 05-29-2009, 03:49 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
17,029 posts, read 30,940,501 times
Reputation: 16265

Advertisements

In the process of buying in an area that is more expensive than my current area. Had not planned on moving, but getting relocated seems to be part of life. With that said, some of my stocks took a hit last year and I'm not as liquid as I would like to be. I have a separate emergency account with 6 months of savings, and am thinking of dipping into it to make a 20% down payment on the new house. This would take about 50% of the account. What do you think...put down 10-15% and pay PMI for a year or two, or go for the 20% and have a little more 'downside exposure'. I lean toward the latter...I work with a Fortune 500 company and I believe my position is stable.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 05-29-2009, 03:56 PM
 
982 posts, read 1,101,041 times
Reputation: 249
If it were me, I would put the 20% down and put what I would've paid in PMI back into the emergency account every month.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2009, 04:36 PM
 
28,453 posts, read 85,431,256 times
Reputation: 18729
I agree with MFP -- the "hit" to your liquidity is a lot easier to cushion than flushing money into a worthless PMI firm...

In fact, I would go so far as to recommend selling some non-tax advantaged assets to avoid PMI -- the "return" on such a use of funds is pretty quick!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2009, 05:22 PM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,541,572 times
Reputation: 27720
Or rent in the new location until you have the 20% saved up. Just throwing another option on the table.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2009, 05:26 PM
 
5,747 posts, read 12,058,185 times
Reputation: 4512
If you are absolutely committed to buying, here's another vote for putting down 20%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2009, 05:42 PM
 
Location: Salem, OR
15,584 posts, read 40,460,388 times
Reputation: 17498
I give MsFancyPants plan a 4th vote.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2009, 09:06 PM
 
1,477 posts, read 2,199,074 times
Reputation: 22489
I give happytexan a second vote. I had a few friends who had really high paying jobs last year. They never thought that they would lose their jobs, but when they did, they went through their 6mos emergency fund very quickly. The lesson learned from that was the old cliche: better safe than sorry.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-29-2009, 09:15 PM
 
5,280 posts, read 6,219,958 times
Reputation: 3131
I'd stay as liqid as possible. If things go well you can simply pay extra every month and get re-appraised when the you have gotten down to 80% of the original purchase. And if things pick up you can re-appraise to show you current debt is less than 80% of the homes value. I did the latter in my first place.

I say this as someone who quit a job out of sheer frustration last spring and took until the start of winter to find a new one. I getting interviews and they seemed to go well but half the places had lay-offs within a month of my interview. A big life-lesson learned is that 6 months is a long time until 1/2 way through month five when it feels very shot.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2009, 07:58 AM
 
982 posts, read 1,101,041 times
Reputation: 249
The only problem with getting re-appraised is that most lenders (or some, I shouldn't say most, but most of the ones I've used) won't reappraise to remove PMI for two years, regardless of how much you pay down the principle or how the market appreciates. I found that out when I was trying to refi a condo I had bought 6 months earlier during the boom. I was well above the 80/20 threshold and they said nope, not for two years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 05-30-2009, 12:09 PM
 
Location: Asheville, NC
12,626 posts, read 32,086,888 times
Reputation: 5420
Quote:
Originally Posted by MsFancyPants View Post
If it were me, I would put the 20% down and put what I would've paid in PMI back into the emergency account every month.
You just read my mind!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top