Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-17-2009, 07:36 AM
 
53 posts, read 125,641 times
Reputation: 55

Advertisements

Another black mark for you spiny agents as far as I'm concerned.

We found ahome we like. It's a new home. I found the home, not the agent and basically worked up a deal with builder directly. Being the nice guy I am, I had our agent, who showed us homes about 8 homes a few days before, write up the offer. I felt loyal to her cause she had showed us those 8 homes the day before and seemed to be a sincere lady.

Anyhow, as we are writing up the offer, out comes a form, she slips it in there and states she needs me to sign to it, agreeing that she represents me as a buyer's agent. She describes it as a "normal and must be signed form" letting me know what she is and is not, as my agent. As I grab the paper and prepare to sign it, out comes the truth. It is an exclusive right to represent form, stating she gets her commission no matter what, if we buy a home anywhere in the area for the next 180 days! It's a contract, assuring she gets her 3% and for 6 months after that, should we buy a home she had previously shown us.

I was nice and polite, but confronted her about the "contract" and she said she "would not be able to write up an offer with us, if we did not agree to it."

Now under most normal circumstances I would be okay with something like this. But the agent does not update me on new listings, refused to show us more homes while the other home's offer was being looked over by the seller. I need something fast, and she has a ho-hum attitude about things.

Since the offer was all written up and ready to be faxed over, in the heat of the moment, I signed it. The seller has countered our offer and given us 3 days to respond. I asked our agent to please show us more homes during those three days, so we could get a better feel for what is out there and weigh our options. She is busy, she needs 2 days to set appointments, etc, etc.

In the meantime, my wife and I went out and looked at homes by ourselves! We looked at new homes, that certainly do not require an agent to write up an offer.

Is there any way we can get out of those terms? This agent is lazy and not doing her job. I am forced to find the home on our own and go back to her to draw up the offer. Rediculous!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-17-2009, 08:22 AM
 
Location: Just south of Denver since 1989
11,828 posts, read 34,440,909 times
Reputation: 8986
Which house would you like to buy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2009, 09:28 AM
 
Location: Salem, OR
15,578 posts, read 40,440,822 times
Reputation: 17483
I don't understand why you signed it to begin with. You felt she was spiny, yet signed it anyway.

Call her principal broker and ask to be released from the contract.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2009, 11:31 AM
 
Location: Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas
4,207 posts, read 15,258,757 times
Reputation: 2720
The buyer's agent contract is standard and actually required if the agent is indeed going to represent you. If you don't sign it the agent will be representing the seller.

However, the terms are negotiable. The lenght of the contract can be from a day to whatever you want it to be. You can also make it specific to a particular house etc.

Since you are not happy with her, you should ask for it to be amended where it will apply only to those homes that she showed you and to the one that you signed a contract on with the builder. Any other home would not apply.

Naima
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2009, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Tempe, Arizona
4,511 posts, read 13,582,493 times
Reputation: 2201
Quote:
Originally Posted by nsumner View Post
The buyer's agent contract is standard and actually required if the agent is indeed going to represent you. If you don't sign it the agent will be representing the seller....
I think that is state dependent. In AZ, the buyer is not required to sign an employment contract and the buyer agent's fiduciary duty is still with the buyer, not the seller. We do have clients sign an agency disclosure that clearly states who the agent is representing, but it's not a contract.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2009, 12:52 PM
 
Location: Salem, OR
15,578 posts, read 40,440,822 times
Reputation: 17483
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjrcm View Post
I think that is state dependent. In AZ, the buyer is not required to sign an employment contract and the buyer agent's fiduciary duty is still with the buyer, not the seller. We do have clients sign an agency disclosure that clearly states who the agent is representing, but it's not a contract.

We are the same out here. We are required to disclose agency as part of our offer, but a buyer agency agreement with terms is not required.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-17-2009, 08:07 PM
 
Location: Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas
4,207 posts, read 15,258,757 times
Reputation: 2720
Quote:
Originally Posted by rjrcm View Post
I think that is state dependent. In AZ, the buyer is not required to sign an employment contract and the buyer agent's fiduciary duty is still with the buyer, not the seller. We do have clients sign an agency disclosure that clearly states who the agent is representing, but it's not a contract.
You are correct, it is state specific. It is our case in Texas.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silverfall View Post
We are the same out here. We are required to disclose agency as part of our offer, but a buyer agency agreement with terms is not required.
We are required to disclose agency at the first face to face meeting not until an offer is written. We don't have to submit that with our offers.

There are still too many agents that don't have the buyer sign the buyer rep. agreement fearing rejection.

Naima
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2009, 10:32 AM
 
29 posts, read 58,870 times
Reputation: 15
You can get her to send you a release form. If she refuses, tell her you will give her bad PR from here to the end of her career. That should make her comply.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2009, 12:04 PM
 
Location: Austin
7,244 posts, read 21,814,092 times
Reputation: 10015
Quote:
Originally Posted by nsumner View Post
The buyer's agent contract is standard and actually required if the agent is indeed going to represent you. If you don't sign it the agent will be representing the seller.
Naima
This is so NOT true! Texas has "implied representation" so you do not need the buyers rep signed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-18-2009, 12:08 PM
 
Location: Salem, OR
15,578 posts, read 40,440,822 times
Reputation: 17483
Quote:
Originally Posted by nsumner View Post
You are correct, it is state specific. It is our case in Texas.



We are required to disclose agency at the first face to face meeting not until an offer is written. We don't have to submit that with our offers.

There are still too many agents that don't have the buyer sign the buyer rep. agreement fearing rejection.

Naima

We give clients the agency disclosure form at our first meeting, but it doesn't mean clients are agreeing to an agency relationship. The agreement for an agency relationship can occur with a buyer agency agreement (which is preferred) or at minimum it has to occur at the time of the offer.

Out here the client has to agree to a relationship otherwise there is none. You can agree verbally, but the attorney's prefer a written agreement. So out here, no agreement means no relationship, which means no fiduciary duties. Discussing agency at the first meeting doesn't constitute agreeing to an agency relationship per Oregon laws.

It's no wonder consumers are confused by things. Some states default to transaction brokerage, some states default to seller agency, and some states default to no agency...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Real Estate

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:49 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top