Quote:
Originally Posted by Silverfall
Oh man...
Okay here are some rules...first one is the 90 day FHA flip rule which required that if an investor flips a property within 90 days of purchase that FHA requires two appraisals to determine value. So the two appraisals is totally normal.
Second rules apply to the new HUD guidelines that went into effect Jan 1 regarding making changes to loans. They have something called tolerances now which indicates how close mortgage brokers have to be on their good faith estimates. These tolerances are important because if they are exceeded the mortgage brokers will eat those costs for not being accurate in their original estimates. I am concerned that your mortgage broker blew it on the original good faith estimate and was trying to have you make up their mistakes "under the table." If there is a substantial change to the loan like an interest rate jump, then the loan gets delayed as the waiting rules apply.
So in the transaction there is typically the buyer's agent, the seller's agent, the mortgage broker, and the lender. It sounds like your agent as the buyer agent was also the listing agent? This means they represented you and the seller at the same time. I'm not sure about that, since you aren't clear.
Then there is the mortgage broker. They are the ones that interface with the lender, who is the one that actually gives you the money.
You can't do anything under the table. It is illegal.
|
Silverfall, Thank you for your response. Maybe I can clarify a bit more.
When I received the Good Faith Estimate I was told there would be two. One which would be "about accurate" and one which would be "overstated."
The final settlement statement was lower than the overstated GFE and about the same as the "about accurate" one. But the final settlement statement did not include the $995 processing fee which my agent claims he paid to the broker, or $1900 additional charges my agent claims he paid to the lender to reduce the interest rate. I then wrote the checks to my agent to reimburse for these charges outside the close of escrow.
In this situation both my agent and the broker company was dealing with the lender. My agent also has a business card that shows him as a Morgage Broker. I believe in this case he was the buyers agent only or possibly the buyers agent and the 2nd broker??
Maybe this will help let me assign some fake names:
John - Buyers Agent working with me and the broker and the lender
Mary (West Mortgage) - Broker dealing with my agent and the lender as well as the sellers agent
Tom - Sellers Agent dealing mainly with my agent and of course the seller
Housing Financial - The lender, working with the broker and my agent
California Title - Escrow officer dealing with the broker and my agent and the sellers agent.
My concern is that my agent (John) has an office in the same building as the broker (Mary - West Mortgage) so I believe if I was ripped off they are in it together. Someone had recommended that I ask the broker for clarification. But if they are in it together then wouldn't they just try to come up with a story toghether? John has his own "Realty" company name that he uses and when I wrote the checks to reimburse John for money he claims to have paid to the Broker and lender under the table I paid it to his Realty company name.
Is it possible that both John and Mary could have both been brokers in this situation and that John was also my agent?