Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
If you found out early in a relationship (before deep feelings were involved) that the guy you were dating had a small “package”..(size of 4” or less), would you continue dating him? I know there are gonna be those that say “it’s not the size, it’s the motion, etc” or “we can bring in toys” etc…, but the bottom line is: would you commit yourself to a long-term relationship with a guy if you learn early on that he’s not physically equipped to give you pleasure, sans toys and/or other stimulation?
I would.
I have. (Not present husband)
The guy had a lot of other things going for him. Besides, sex is a little over rated in the LONG TERM if you ask me. JMHO, of course.
Some of the biggest, asinine jerks I have known in my life were hung like a horse. I wouldn't give you two cents for them.
It's hard to get an honest answer to this question OP. Just like men care about the state of a female vagina, many women secretly do care about the size.
I somehow consider size to be important both for men and women if the guy is too small or enormous or if the woman is too flabby loose, wrinkled, hanging lips, etc. or if she was too tight that it made it difficult. But, would it be a reason to dump your significant other because of it? Not so sure unless the relationship just focused on sex.
My only thing with toys, etc is: who wants to deal with that every time you want to have sex? What if you want it spur of the moment? What if you're on vacation and don't want to pack toys? What if you don't want all of your satisfaction to come orally? If the guy had little equipment to get the job done, without help, it would seem taxing to have to use toys, games, etc every time you wanted to get it on.
To each and all their own. None of those things sounds horrible to me at all.
I somehow consider size to be important both for men and women if the guy is too small or enormous or if the woman is too flabby loose, wrinkled, hanging lips, etc. or if she was too tight that it made it difficult. But, would it be a reason to dump your significant other because of it? Not so sure unless the relationship just focused on sex.
Can see how a woman's tightness could be a hindrance...but loose/saggy lips? Other than not being visually appealing, how would that be an obstacle to enjoying the act of sex?
Many of the posters on this board can sell you a donkey, if needed. Well hung, but without anything up top.
The guy doesn't have to be hung or have a monster penis....would actually prefer he didn't. BUT, wouldn't want a tiny guy. Just wondering if women would be willing to overlook this "small" roadblock.
If you found out early in a relationship (before deep feelings were involved) that the guy you were dating had a small “package”..(size of 4” or less), would you continue dating him? I know there are gonna be those that say “it’s not the size, it’s the motion, etc” or “we can bring in toys” etc…, but the bottom line is: would you commit yourself to a long-term relationship with a guy if you learn early on that he’s not physically equipped to give you pleasure, sans toys and/or other stimulation?
Bigger is better IMO. I dated a guy whose friends actually told me he had the "smallest package ever" so I found out this was true, the relationship only lasted about 3 months.....
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
