Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Just a reminder, she gets book offers/book deals for violating privacy. That student at Rutgers gets arrested for violation of privacy and might even face hate crimes. All that matters is if the victim has darling status. Straight men do not, gay men do.
The double standard is not right. They should all be arrested.
Just a reminder, she gets book offers/book deals for violating privacy. That student at Rutgers gets arrested for violation of privacy and might even face hate crimes. All that matters is if the victim has darling status. Straight men do not, gay men do.
Despite both stories being despicable, please do not compare the two.
There is a huge difference between disclosing and retelling activities you yourself were personally involved in (which is not an invasion of privacy) and installing a webcam without consent and airing, distributing, advertising and mocking an activity that others were engaging in, with the intent to "out" and shame.
OH MY GOD I can’t believe the “you go girl” thing is being brought up AGAIN. Please, PLEEEEEEEEEEASE go back and read what I have explained about that.
You're so sick of hearing it that you bumped your own thread a week later!
Just a reminder, she gets book offers/book deals for violating privacy. That student at Rutgers gets arrested for violation of privacy and might even face hate crimes. All that matters is if the victim has darling status. Straight men do not, gay men do.
Weren't you whining about people who play the victim card? Geez Louise , meet the pot Mr. kettle
Despite both stories being despicable, please do not compare the two.
There is a huge difference between disclosing and retelling activities you yourself were personally involved in (which is not an invasion of privacy) and installing a webcam without consent and airing, distributing, advertising and mocking an activity that others were engaging in, with the intent to "out" and shame.
She revealed very personal information about these guys, without their consent.. The rutgers guy filmed something that took place in his own room.
She revealed very personal information about these guys, without their consent.. The rutgers guy filmed something that took place in his own room.
Are you kidding me? It was their room and he asked his roomate if he could use it privately. His roomate then when into another dorm room, activated the webcam and began tweeting about it and inviting people to view them live.
Are you kidding me? It was their room and he asked his roomate if he could use it privately. His roomate then when into another dorm room, activated the webcam and began tweeting about it and inviting people to view them live.
And the men she reported on had an expectation to privacy as well given the nature of their activities. Failure to see that is just a violation of plain common sense.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It was their room and he asked his roomate if he could use it privately. His roomate then when into another dorm room, activated the webcam and began tweeting about it and inviting people to view them live.
