Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
 
Old 06-24-2011, 02:01 PM
 
Location: Wu Dang Mountain
12,940 posts, read 21,633,549 times
Reputation: 8681

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bosco55David View Post
Just FYI, here are some I pulled up on Freeones. Granted there are duplicates in there, but even then it easily blows your stance out of the water.

Sasha Grey - 653 listings

Gianna Michaels - 835

Belladonna - 218

Sierra Skye - 168

Barbie Cummings - 203

Hilary Scott - 685

Tera Patrick - 397
For what it's worth, my friend, you might be shooting yourself in the foot with this line of defense...

A random pick of actresses on this site with names beginning with "B" and "S" returned the following results:

"B" - 40 profiles per page - first 6 pages - number of profiles BELOW 100:
  1. 37
  2. 40
  3. 37
  4. 39
  5. 39
  6. 38
"S" - same:
  1. 37
  2. 37
  3. 38
  4. 39
  5. 36
  6. 37
So just from this random sampling, a MINIMUM of 90% of these actresses have less than 100 links.

Another way to state it: at most, 10% of these gals have more than 100links (theoretically, 100 different partners, allowing for duplication as you mentioned).

Sorry.

 
Old 06-24-2011, 02:34 PM
 
Location: Tampa (by way of Omaha)
14,561 posts, read 23,084,295 times
Reputation: 10357
Quote:
Originally Posted by RockJock1729 View Post
Perhaps you should heed your own advice. From the Wikipedia page on ad hominem fallacies
Gotta love how the wannabe intellectual skips the examples I talked about.

Quote:
Examples:
  • "You can't believe Jack when he says the proposed policy would help the economy. He doesn't even have a job."
  • "Candidate Jane's proposal about zoning is ridiculous. She was caught cheating on her taxes in 2003."
  • "Jeff's argument on LeBron James' failures in the NBA finals aren't worth reading, everyone knows he is a "LeBron" hater."
An abusive ad hominem can apply to a judgment of cultural works or academic efforts based on the behavior or unconventional political beliefs of an artist, author, or musician, or the taste of an infamous person who loved a certain work.
Examples:
  • Jimi Hendrix died of a drug overdose, so his music was worthless.
  • Leni Riefenstahl was a Nazi, so her film The Triumph of the Will is devoid of merit.
  • Sylvia Plath was a depressive who eventually committed suicide, so her works are unreadable.
  • That Boris Godunov was the favorite opera of Joseph Stalin indicates the worthlessness of the opera.
  • What Ted Kaczynski wrote about boundary conditions in mathematics is shown false due to his crimes.
  • White men are "privileged", so they can't comment on female oppression.
If you think my statement was an ad hominem attack...well...we're strictly moderated here so I guess I'll let the audience make their own decisions about your intelligence. Judging by the responses so far, you came up short.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SifuPhil View Post
For what it's worth, my friend, you might be shooting yourself in the foot with this line of defense...

A random pick of actresses on this site with names beginning with "B" and "S" returned the following results:

"B" - 40 profiles per page - first 6 pages - number of profiles BELOW 100:
  1. 37
  2. 40
  3. 37
  4. 39
  5. 39
  6. 38
"S" - same:
  1. 37
  2. 37
  3. 38
  4. 39
  5. 36
  6. 37
So just from this random sampling, a MINIMUM of 90% of these actresses have less than 100 links.

Another way to state it: at most, 10% of these gals have more than 100links (theoretically, 100 different partners, allowing for duplication as you mentioned).

Sorry.
Fair point Phil, but how many of those links contain multiple partner scenes, and how long have those girls been in the game? Even if you go conservative and say 1 in 3 are multiple partner, you're real close to 100. And let's not get too wound up in that arbitrary number either. 80, 90, 100...at some point it's all semantics my friend. Besides, me and you both know that there are plenty of girls that will come out and shoot a scene or three and then never heard from again, but then again those aren't really porn "stars" either.
 
Old 06-24-2011, 03:31 PM
 
Location: Wu Dang Mountain
12,940 posts, read 21,633,549 times
Reputation: 8681
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bosco55David View Post
Fair point Phil, but how many of those links contain multiple partner scenes, and how long have those girls been in the game? Even if you go conservative and say 1 in 3 are multiple partner, you're real close to 100. And let's not get too wound up in that arbitrary number either. 80, 90, 100...at some point it's all semantics my friend. Besides, me and you both know that there are plenty of girls that will come out and shoot a scene or three and then never heard from again, but then again those aren't really porn "stars" either.
Ah, but how many contain solo or girl-on-girl scenes?

I agree though - it's semantics, and nothing any of us say will likely sway any else's opinions.

*returning to his porn shoot*
 
Old 06-24-2011, 03:33 PM
 
38 posts, read 71,599 times
Reputation: 68
Hi, Clint here, been reading the forums for a while, decided to respond. I think dating a pornstar is unacceptable and morally reprehensible. Anyone who would do such a thing is lacking in character.

-
Clint
 
Old 06-24-2011, 03:34 PM
 
Location: The D-M-V area
13,691 posts, read 18,465,881 times
Reputation: 9596
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skydive Outlaw View Post
So, if you knew one and were friends and it led to something more, would you do it?

In the grand scheme of things and looking at the situation objectively and logically. It would be hard to really make an argument against dating one if everything else clicked in terms of a relationship.

For example. Women that are not porn stars, that are attractive and have a high sex drive are inherently always looking for a better deal, so it is only a matter of time before one cheats on you - which would involve lying, deception and manipulation until you find out. A porn star would never cheat since technically going to work and performing would not be cheating.

A regular woman would require all of the usual time, effort and money involved in taking care of her all while validating her ego and giving her attention as well (craved by women like an addict wants cocaine). With a porn star, she would have her own money from filming, her website and occasional stipping tours, and she would never need the constant attention a normal woman would to feed her ego since she is more than likely confident enough in her self and own beauty.

As far as the sexual side of things, it would be a given that she is down for anything she already has done at work, and would be more so within the parameters of her own relationship.

If you were with one, it would be safe to assume that she actually valued her relationship with you since she could have almost any other guy that she wanted and that alone would be a plus.

The average girl next door, if you had access to video footage of every sexual encounter she ever engaged in, at the end of the day would probably not seem much different than a porn star - with the only difference being one of them has had her experiences filmed and was paid for them and the other one has not, while telling you she has only been with five guys before.
You're asking all the wrong questions and making the wrong analogies... here's one you didn't even consider:

Why would a guy/girl want someone they know was paid to perform sex acts on video, who's private parts have been seen by hundreds of thousands many many times, who's public image will forever be associated with being a $Lu+, that other guys have been in, lusted over, and used as masturbation material?

I don't understand the fascination with porn stars... Are they the Millenium's new "status symbol" for men? Are some men that insecure that they think hooking up with a porn "star" (and I use the term "star" liberally as they are all Porn Stars) raises their status in the male world? If that's true men are devolving and not evolving.

Last edited by LuckyGem; 06-24-2011 at 03:43 PM..
 
Old 06-24-2011, 03:43 PM
 
Location: Tampa (by way of Omaha)
14,561 posts, read 23,084,295 times
Reputation: 10357
Quote:
Originally Posted by SifuPhil View Post
Ah, but how many contain solo or girl-on-girl scenes?
Touche', although we could count the girls as partners too. I know most guys wouldn't...or more accurately...wouldn't care (I wouldn't either) but if ya wanted to be technical...

Quote:
*returning to his porn shoot*
Send me a copy!
 
Old 06-24-2011, 03:52 PM
 
2,994 posts, read 5,776,984 times
Reputation: 1822
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skydive Outlaw View Post
So, if you knew one and were friends and it led to something more, would you do it?

In the grand scheme of things and looking at the situation objectively and logically. It would be hard to really make an argument against dating one if everything else clicked in terms of a relationship.

For example. Women that are not porn stars, that are attractive and have a high sex drive are inherently always looking for a better deal, so it is only a matter of time before one cheats on you - which would involve lying, deception and manipulation until you find out. A porn star would never cheat since technically going to work and performing would not be cheating.

A regular woman would require all of the usual time, effort and money involved in taking care of her all while validating her ego and giving her attention as well (craved by women like an addict wants cocaine). With a porn star, she would have her own money from filming, her website and occasional stipping tours, and she would never need the constant attention a normal woman would to feed her ego since she is more than likely confident enough in her self and own beauty.

As far as the sexual side of things, it would be a given that she is down for anything she already has done at work, and would be more so within the parameters of her own relationship.

If you were with one, it would be safe to assume that she actually valued her relationship with you since she could have almost any other guy that she wanted and that alone would be a plus.

The average girl next door, if you had access to video footage of every sexual encounter she ever engaged in, at the end of the day would probably not seem much different than a porn star - with the only difference being one of them has had her experiences filmed and was paid for them and the other one has not, while telling you she has only been with five guys before.
Its difficult for a man to have respect for a woman who doesnt have dignity toward herself ; such a woman has obvious issues that she would allow multiple penises to have their way with her...all for the love of money. 'Use me all you like cause the more you use me the more I make' .
 
Old 06-25-2011, 01:47 AM
 
Location: Westcoast
313 posts, read 450,921 times
Reputation: 407
I don't think I'd even want to bang one. I admire people who treat their bodies with respect and care and dignity, who have sex when they really want to and are discriminating about it. Nor have I ever understood guys who brag that they'll sleep 'with anything'.

And needless to say, I can't see myself ever marrying a porn star.
 
Old 06-29-2011, 01:16 PM
 
Location: USA
31,077 posts, read 22,117,738 times
Reputation: 19103
A friend of mine had done several shoots in the past. As described by her it was not a pleasant sexually. Most woman that have done porn fit into this category: tried it, realized it was not what was sold to them, then got out of it. You may even know someone who has done porn, but would never know.

Last edited by LS Jaun; 06-29-2011 at 01:36 PM..
 
Old 06-29-2011, 01:27 PM
 
78,499 posts, read 60,679,264 times
Reputation: 49821
The problem is that a high proportion of women in the porn industry have serious issues with relationships, substance abuse and so on and so forth.

That's not something I'm interested in getting involved in.

Also, I'm not judging people that get sucked into porn, prostitution etc. as some (especially in other countries and cultures) really have no choice in the matter.

FYI- I'm reading Louis and Clarks journals where a brave will "rent out" his wife in exchange for a gift\payment and it's absolutely ok with all involved and just part of the culture.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.



All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top