Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Location: RI, MA, VT, WI, IL, CA, IN (that one sucked), KY
41,936 posts, read 36,957,550 times
Reputation: 40635
Advertisements
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taiko
They were made that way to pretend it was art so it would not be banned. When the consumer moved from a theatre where they masturbated to the film with built in recovery time in the dark for another try to his home when he could stop the VCR and not wanting to fast forward the industry responding by selling compilations without a binding script for the fantasy scenarios.
This isn't entirely true, first, they still make full length features. Even when those classic 70s golden age films were made they were still making loops for quickies, and there were other ways to get around vice laws, which they used a lot in the early 70s by narrating them as educational videos. They were still making plenty of full length features in the 80s as well, when BETA and VHS were common.
SO much misinformation in one post. Do you watch a lot of Bill Maher?
Misinformation? Everything i posted is based on logic and biology. It certainly makes more sense then all that "no-fap" mythology floating around on the internet Incidentally, when i take a peek in some of those "no-fap" discussions, every once in a while i see someone posting about getting diagnosed with testicular cancer or something similar. Is it related? Who knows, but "bottling up" a NATURAL biological urge is usually not good for any animal.
Do you have any valid counter-arguments or rebuttals?
Last edited by UbbyJuice; 06-21-2017 at 02:13 PM..
Misinformation? Everything i posted is based on logic and biology. It certainly makes more sense then all that "no-fap" mythology floating around on the internet Incidentally, when i take a peek in some of those "no-fap" discussions, every once in a while i see someone posting about getting diagnosed with testicular cancer or something similar. Is it related? Who knows, but "bottling up" a NATURAL biological urge is usually not good for any animal.
Do you have any valid counter-arguments or rebuttals?
You had nothing valid; only opinion. Why are you holding me to a higher standard?
FYI I don't spend time on "no-fap" sites.
You basically have said that if women would just sleep with these guys, there would be no more mass shootings. It's the same old tired Eliot Rodgers-inspired crap that has gotten plenty of noobs before you banned here.
Also, the old "95% of guys use it and the other 5% are lying" is the second-most tired line ever slung here on CD.
Some of these guys think we're all sitting around reading "erotic novels" instead of looking at porn because we supposedly aren't as visual as men or something.
"No fap" is a guy thing and recent online "movement", so naturally it doesn't make any sense to you.
I didn't read thru the whole thread, but casually skimming through some earlier responses i notice some of the guy posters in this thread seem to be from that line of thinking. I happen to disagree with these guys, but to each their own.
"No fap" is a guy thing and recent online "movement", so naturally it doesn't make any sense to you.
I didn't read thru the whole thread, but casually skimming through some earlier responses i notice some of the guy posters in this thread seem to be from that line of thinking. I happen to disagree with these guys, but to each their own.
This is really some of the best mansplaining I've ever seen.
Gotta snip this example to present at our next fembot meeting, during the "share" time right after we take turns reading aloud from erotic novels.
Some of these guys think we're all sitting around reading "erotic novels" instead of looking at porn because we supposedly aren't as visual as men or something.
What are erotic novels? Like Harlequin Romance, is that what they keep accusing us of?
I need something less sweet-sticky-romantic.
I think there are a couple of surprise sex scenes in the last Steven King book I read. I like scary/sexy drama movies too. I don't like graphic porn, I wouldn't choose to watch it. I do like books more, but not the barfy kind. We're all not doing anything the same, I think men want to use less imagination when it comes to porn.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.