Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 09-27-2012, 08:26 AM
 
Location: Texas
44,254 posts, read 64,351,440 times
Reputation: 73932

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Doll Eyes View Post
oh please. I didn't say testing them. I said checking to verify what all they tell you on a regular basis. Sorry but I don't beleive everything a person tells me. If you do simply b/c that's your partner, then so be it. .
Man.
What has happened to the world?
Trust but verify?
That's what you do to a teenager. Or a NATO counterpart.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 09-27-2012, 08:38 AM
 
14,294 posts, read 13,186,136 times
Reputation: 17797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doll Eyes View Post
I have a few questions for these relationship peoples on here.....Do any of you think it's possible to have a relationship where the people don't trust each other 100 percent and it not end up badly? Is 100 percent trust necessary and the end all be all? Why do so many of these people think they have to throw all caution to the wind in these so called 'love' situations in order for it to work? Why is being foolhardy a requirement for relationships?

Answer one, all or none. ty
Trust is developed over time by being with someone who is trustworthy. Foolhardy is not the opposite of trust.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2012, 09:20 AM
 
Location: Canada
11,795 posts, read 12,028,825 times
Reputation: 30414
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doll Eyes View Post
oh please. I didn't say testing them. I said checking to verify what all they tell you on a regular basis. Sorry but I don't beleive everything a person tells me. If you do simply b/c that's your partner, then so be it. Again, if you don't beleive there are shades and degrees that's you, not me.
Yep, so be it. I've had many romantic relationships in my life, I know how things work, and it IS all or nothing. You don't fragment all the components of a relationship and assign a trust level to each one. If you can't trust your partner in one aspect of the relationship, that permeates the whole relationship.

A person is either trustworthy, or they aren't. A healthy relationship is built on full trust, not partial.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2012, 10:00 AM
 
Location: Texas
44,254 posts, read 64,351,440 times
Reputation: 73932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liberty2011 View Post
Yep, so be it. I've had many romantic relationships in my life, I know how things work, and it IS all or nothing. You don't fragment all the components of a relationship and assign a trust level to each one. If you can't trust your partner in one aspect of the relationship, that permeates the whole relationship.

A person is either trustworthy, or they aren't. A healthy relationship is built on full trust, not partial.
I think they may also be expressing it backwards.

No, you don't trust someone 100% because they are your partner.

They are your partner because you trust them 100%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2012, 10:26 AM
 
14,294 posts, read 13,186,136 times
Reputation: 17797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liberty2011 View Post
Yep, so be it. I've had many romantic relationships in my life, I know how things work, and it IS all or nothing. You don't fragment all the components of a relationship and assign a trust level to each one. If you can't trust your partner in one aspect of the relationship, that permeates the whole relationship.

A person is either trustworthy, or they aren't. A healthy relationship is built on full trust, not partial.
Well what is meant by full trust? I can trust my husband to love me, be there for me, have me as his highest priority in the world. I cannot trust him to remember to do something that he has said he would do. It just is not him. I can trust him to try really hard to work on organizational skills that overcome such an issue...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2012, 10:28 AM
 
Location: Texas
44,254 posts, read 64,351,440 times
Reputation: 73932
Quote:
Originally Posted by somebodynew View Post
Well what is meant by full trust? I can trust my husband to love me, be there for me, have me as his highest priority in the world. I cannot trust him to remember to do something that he has said he would do. It just is not him. I can trust him to try really hard to work on organizational skills that overcome such an issue...
That is what was not clearly delineated in the op.
We asked for clarification and got none.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2012, 10:38 AM
 
5,653 posts, read 5,152,398 times
Reputation: 5624
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doll Eyes View Post
I have a few questions for these relationship peoples on here.....Do any of you think it's possible to have a relationship where the people don't trust each other 100 percent and it not end up badly? Is 100 percent trust necessary and the end all be all? Why do so many of these people think they have to throw all caution to the wind in these so called 'love' situations in order for it to work? Why is being foolhardy a requirement for relationships?
I think it's possible yes, certainly not going to be an easy marriage but i'd say yes it is possible but highly undesirable. As for the being foolhardy well, I can't really answer that.... the things we do when in love and searching for love aren't always exactly logical I suppose...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2012, 10:38 AM
 
15,714 posts, read 21,067,448 times
Reputation: 12818
Quote:
Originally Posted by somebodynew View Post
Well what is meant by full trust? I can trust my husband to love me, be there for me, have me as his highest priority in the world. I cannot trust him to remember to do something that he has said he would do. It just is not him. I can trust him to try really hard to work on organizational skills that overcome such an issue...
I agree here. There are actually a few things I don't trust my husband with...like laundry (learned the hard way), completing tasks when he promises it will be done by a specific date, and honestly, I don't trust him to make medical decisions for me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2012, 10:41 AM
 
Location: Canada
11,795 posts, read 12,028,825 times
Reputation: 30414
Quote:
Originally Posted by somebodynew View Post
Well what is meant by full trust? I can trust my husband to love me, be there for me, have me as his highest priority in the world. I cannot trust him to remember to do something that he has said he would do. It just is not him. I can trust him to try really hard to work on organizational skills that overcome such an issue...
IMO, that's an example of a different definition of trust. It's not betraying your marriage that he has lousy organizational skills or a bad memory. Would you really call him untrustworthy because he's forgetful and you both know it?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 09-27-2012, 10:44 AM
 
14,294 posts, read 13,186,136 times
Reputation: 17797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liberty2011 View Post
IMO, that's an example of a different definition of trust. It's not betraying your marriage that he has lousy organizational skills or a bad memory. Would you really call him untrustworthy because he's forgetful and you both know it?
Nope! That was largely my point.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Relationships
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:50 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top