Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The test I usually offer during a dinner date is last years International Baccalaureate test. I feel that the SAT was too easy for my past few dates, so I found a slightly more obscure academic programme.
I am anti-traditional. My test is that I offer to pay for the first date and if she takes me up on it without some sort of response e.g. "I will pay next time", or "we should split it", or "I can pay" etc. there is no second date. I like liberated women I find them to be much more fun and interesting.
I hate having people pay for me-- I have my own money-- but I *do* love it when they offer.
I am anti-traditional. My test is that I offer to pay for the first date and if she takes me up on it without some sort of response e.g. "I will pay next time", or "we should split it", or "I can pay" etc. there is no second date. I like liberated women I find them to be much more fun and interesting.
Well I could say I'm anti traditional myself so I see where you are coming from. As long don't expect everyone to cosign with your way do what works for you.
The test I usually offer during a dinner date is last years International Baccalaureate test. I feel that the SAT was too easy for my past few dates, so I found a slightly more obscure academic programme.
There's a test that all players take before going into the NFL draft. I can't remember the name off hand, but it's a crazy test. Look that up and take it once or twice and see how you fair lol.
Well I could say I'm anti traditional myself so I see where you are coming from. As long don't expect everyone to cosign with your way do what works for you.
I don't really care what other folks do since I don't have to live there lives.
Here is another situation, also based loosely on fact:
Man and woman meet, hang out for a month. Things start to get romantic after week two with some kissing and snuggling but nothing sexual until week four. Man breaks off relationship after week four, stating that he cannot take the relationship seriously because they were too intimate too quickly and it says something about the woman's character. Woman says that she had no idea they were going "too quickly" as it was the man who was the initiator in the intimate situation.
In this scenario, was the test valid? What do you think of this?
Dude's either a weirdo or he likes to play head games.
Either way, good riddance.
Life is too short to deal with such immature nonsense.
Hmm, I actually feel the same way as she does. I will offer, but if he accepts, it tells me something about him. I've found that those men are often from the "women want to be treated equal, so I'll treat them like a man" tribe.
However, I don't see it as a test so much as a preference.
I hate having people pay for me-- I have my own money-- but I *do* love it when they offer.
I always offer to pay for courtesy reasons. At the same time I love it when a woman is willing to step up and show she wants a partnership not a purchaser. It is so attractive.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
